Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Suitability of Different Decision-Making Methods Applied for Analysing Sustainable Post-disaster Temporary Housing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

Increasing population of urban areas by 2050, especially in areas highly prone to natural hazards, could potentially threaten vulnerable cities in the face of future disaster events. Alternative temporary housing (TH) needs to be assessed as an important element of local resiliency. In this regard, there are some interrelated factors that can have antithetical impacts on the different cases of TH. Thus, proper decision-making models can be highly useful to deal with this complex multifaceted process. These models should be flexible and adaptable to existing local and boundary conditions since a TH strategy could lead to different satisfactions and perceptions. This chapter aims to present a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for choosing the most sustainable temporary housing alternative. To this end, general requirements of the decision-making process for dealing with temporary housing selection are specified and organized based on the assessed cases. Finally, all possible decision-making methods are assessed to determine the most suitable one based on correspondence between the methods and the requirements. As a result, this study concludes that a robust MCDM method should incorporate concept method to objectively measure the satisfaction degree of every stakeholder involved. In this sense, the Integrated Value Model for Sustainable Assessment (MIVES) is a suitable method for assessing the sustainability of temporary housing since this includes the value function method (based on the utility theory).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguado, A., Caño, A. d., Cruz, M. P., Gómez, D., & Josa, A. (2012). Sustainability assessment of concrete structures within the Spanish structural concrete code. CONSTRUCTION Engineering and Management, 138(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcon, B., Aguado, A., Manga, R., & Josa, A. (2011). A value function for assessing sustainability: Application to industrial buildings. Sustainability, 3, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (2004). Planning for post-disaster reconstruction. I-Rec 2004 International Conference Improving Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Developing Countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (2010). The L’Aquila earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian government policy on disaster response. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2010.511450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alparslan, E., Ince, F., Erkan, B., Aydöner, C., Özen, H., & Dönertaş, A. (2008). A GIS model for settlement suitability regarding disaster mitigation, a case study in Bolu Turkey. Engineering Geology, 96(3), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini Hosseini, K., Hosseinioon, S., & Pooyan, Z. (2013). An investigation into the socioeconomic aspects of two major earthquakes in Iran. Disasters, 37(3), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, H. and Unlu, A. (2006), “The evaluation of community participation in housing reconstruction projects after Duzce earthquake”, 2006 International Conference and Student Competition on Post-disaster Reconstruction “Meeting Stakeholder Interests”, p 13, available at: https://www.grif.umontreal.ca/pages/ARSLAN_%20Hakan.pdf (accessed October 15, 2015).

  • Aruldoss, M., Lakshm, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-1-1-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. J. (2007). Environmental factors influencing the siting of temporary housing. Master thesis, Louisiana State University, Department of Environmental Studies , Louisiana State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Chen, X., Li, Q., & Chen, J. (2013). The temporal hierarchy of shelters: A hierarchical location model for earthquake-shelter planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.763944.

  • Chua, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., Corsellis, T., & Vitale, A. (2010). Transitional shelter: understanding shelter from the emergency through reconstruction and beyond. ALNAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado, J., Zubizarreta, M., Pelaz, B., & Marcos, I. (2015a). Methodology to assess the environmental sustainability of timber structures. Construction and Building Materials, 86, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado, J., Zubizarreta, M., Rojí, E., García, H., & Larrauri, M. (2015b). Sustainability-related decision making in industrial buildings: An AHP analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/157129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2012). Rebuilding housing after a disaster: factors for failure. In Proceedings of 8th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR) (pp. 292–300). Kumamoto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente, A., Armengou, J., Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2014). New precast concrete tower system for wind – Turbine support and tool to asses its sustainability index. Civil Engineering and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Caño, A., Gomez, D., & de la Cruz, M. P. (2012). Uncertainty analysis in the sustainable design of concrete structures: A probabilistic method. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Caño, A., Cruz, M. P., Cartelle, J. J., & Lara, M. (2015). Conceptual framework for an integrated method to optimize sustainability of engineering systems. Energy and Power Engineering, 9, 608–615. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2015.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, J. (2010). Key Considerations in Post-Disaster Reconstruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C. H. (2009). The challenge of organizational design for manufactured construction. Construction innovation, 9(1), 42–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170910931534.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (1982). Shelter after disaster. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, N., Elias-Ozkan, S. T., & Davidson, C. (2012). Comparison of post-disaster housing procurement methods in rural areas of Turkey. Open House International, 37(1), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doocy, S., Gabriel, M., Collins, S., Robinson, C., & Stevenson, P. (2006). Implementing cash for work programmes in post-tsunami Aceh: Experiences and lessons learned. Disasters, 30(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00321.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Anwar, O., & Chen, L. (2012). Computing a displacement distance equivalent to optimize plans for Postdisaster temporary housing projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., & Elnashai, A. (2009a). Optimizing large-scale temporary housing arrangements after natural disasters. Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110)).

  • El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., & Elnashai, A. (2009b). An automated system for optimizing post-disaster temporary housing allocation. Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110))10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik, M. (2000). Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) Earthquakes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fois, F., & Forino, G. (2014). The self-built ecovillage in L’Aquila, Italy: Community resilience as a grassroots response to environmental shock. Disasters, 38(4), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., & Hosseini, M. (2008). Post-bam earthquake: Recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazards, 44(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9108-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharaati, M. & Davidson, C. (2008). Who Knows Best? An Overview of Reconstruction after the Earthquake in Bam, Iran. In: Proceedings of the 4th International i-Rec Conference, University of Canterbury. Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., & Moberg, C. R. (2005). Improving supply chain disaster preparedness: A decision process for secure site location. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510594576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D. (1962). A methodology for systems engineering. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, C. S. (2010). An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901111149141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidayat, B. A. (2010). A literature review of the role of project management in post-disaster reconstruction. Proceedings of 26th annual ARCOM conference (pp. 1269–1278). Association of Researchers in Construction Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M. A., de la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016a). Multi-criteria decision-making method for assessing the sustainability of post-disaster temporary housing units technologies: A case study in Bam, 2003. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M. A., de la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016b). Multicriteria decision-making method for sustainable site location of post-disaster temporary housing in urban areas. Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001137.

  • Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., Arroyo, C. M., & de la Fuente, A. (2016c). Identifying temporary housing main vertexes through assessing post-disaster recovery programs. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 10(10), 1344–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2017). A combination of the knapsack algorithm and MIVES for choosing optimal temporary housing site locations: A case study in Tehran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.013.

  • Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadafi, F., & Fallahi, A. (2010). Temporary housing respond to disasters in developing countries-case study: Iran-Ardabil and Lorestan Province Earthquakes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 1536–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2002). What’s the big deal about temporary housing? Planning considerations for temporary accommodation after disasters: Example of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes. In 2002 TIEMS disaster management conference. Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2007a). Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat International, 31(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2007b). Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters, 31(4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2007.01018.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2009). Planning for temporary. In C. J. Gonzalo Lizarralde (Ed.), Rebuilding after disasters: From emergency to sustainability (pp. 70–87). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., & Davidson, C. H. (2006). A systems view of temporary housing projects in post-disaster reconstruction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600567977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.561477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S., & Leatherman, S. P. (2006). Reconstruction of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(40), 14653–14660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., Ashmore, J., Babister, E., & Kelman, I. (2008). The meaning of ‘build back better’: Evidence from post-tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00529.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazai, B., & Hausler, E. (2005). Intermediate shelters in bam and permanent shelter reconstruction in villages following the 2003 bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2098907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Jiao, J. (2013). A GIS-based suitability analysis of Xiamen’s green space in park for earthquake disaster prevention and refuge. Urban Planning and Design Research, 1(1) 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2003). Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Natural Hazards Review, 4(4), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, G., & Davidson, C. (2006). Learning from the poor. i-Rec conference proceedings 2006: Post-disaster reconstruction: Meeting the stakeholders’ interest.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnan, I. (1998). Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster response. < The> Sphere Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, D., Chu, J., Liu, X., & Zhao, S. (2011). Study on evaluation of earthquake evacuation capacity in village based on multi-level Grey evaluation. Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.08.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, F. X. (2008). FEMA disaster housing and hurricane Katrina: Overview, analysis, and congressional options. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K. F., Peterson, D. J., Sastry, N., & Pollard, M. (2006). The repopulation of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. M., Barnshaw, J., & Torres, M. R. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans: Emergent issues in sheltering and temporary housing. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nojavan, M., & Omidvar, B. (2013). The Selection of Site for Temporary Sheltering using Fuzzy Algorithms;Case study: Tehran Metropolitan after earthquake,Municipal districts No, 1(31), 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omidvar, B., Baradaran-Shoraka, M., & Nojavan, M. (2013). Temporary site selection and decision-making methods: A case study ofTehran, Iran. Disasters, 37(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormazabal, G., Viñolas, B., & Aguado, A. (2008). Enhancing value in crucial decisions: Line 9 of the Barcelona Subway. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:4(265).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozernoy, V. M. (1989). A framework for building an expert system for MCDM models selection. In In improving decision making in Organisations (pp. 553–562). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özerdem, A., & Rufini, G. (2013). L’Aquila’s reconstruction challenges: Has Italy learned from its previous earthquake disasters? Disasters, 37(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01296.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, L. (2003). Disaster management and community planning, and public participations: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 28(2–3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022917721797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Shen, Q., Shen, L., Lu, C., & Yuan, Z. (2014). A generic decision model for developing concentrated rural settlement in post-disaster reconstruction: A China study. Natural Hazards, 71(1), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0924-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2012). Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain. Building and Environment, 53, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2013). Integrated sustainability assessment method applied to structural concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 49, 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujadas, P., Pardo-Bosch, F., Aguado-Renter, A., & Aguado, A. (2017). MIVES multi-criteria approach for the evaluation, prioritization, and selection of public investment projects. A case study in the city of Barcelona. Land Use Policy, 64, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto, T., D’Ayala, D., Gori, F., Persio, R., Han, J., Novelli, V., et al. (2014). The value of multiple earthquake missions: The EEFIT L’Aquila earthquake experience. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(1), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9588-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San-José Lombera, J.-T., & Rojo, J. C. (2010). Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability. Construction and Building Materials, 24(4), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.019.

  • San-José Lombera, J. T. , & Garrucho Aprea, I. G. (2010). A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and environment, 45(3), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.012.

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B., & Djordjevic, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, F. (2007). Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia—Rebuilding lives. Habitat International, 31(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tas, N., Cosgun, N., & Tas, M. (2007). A qualitative evaluation of the after earthquake permanent housings in Turkey in terms of user satisfaction—Kocaeli, Gundogdu permanent housing model. Building and Environment, 42, 3418–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou, E. (2013). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (Vol. 44). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Meding, J., Wong, J., Kanjanabootra, S., & Tafti, M. T. (2016). Competence-based system development for post-disaster project management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viñolas, B. (2011). Applications and advances of MIVES methodology in multi-criteria assessments. PhD thesis, UPC, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viñolas, B., Aguado, A., Josa, A., Villegas, N., & Prada, M. Á. (2009). Aplicación del análisis de valor para una evaluación integral y objetiva del profesorado universitario. 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., Li, W., Li, K., Liu, H., & Chenguse, A. L. (2012). Decision Support for urban shelter locations based on covering model. Procedia Engineering, 43, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, N. E. (2006). Rebuilding housing after hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned and unresolved issues. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, H., & Yang, J. (2014). Research trends of post disaster reconstruction: The past and the future. Habitat International, 42, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: An overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15, 645–682. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain

    S. M. Amin Hosseini, Oriol Pons & Albert de la Fuente

Authors
  1. S. M. Amin Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oriol Pons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Albert de la Fuente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Amin Hosseini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Disaster & Emergency Management, School of Administrative Studies, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Ali Asgary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hosseini, S.M.A., Pons, O., de la Fuente, A. (2019). Suitability of Different Decision-Making Methods Applied for Analysing Sustainable Post-disaster Temporary Housing. In: Asgary, A. (eds) Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92498-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation