Skip to main content

Natural History of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1398 Accesses

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is estimated to affect 1:500 individuals. It may develop at any age but typically develops during adolescence or early adulthood. Mortality rates in HCM are lower than initially suspected, especially in treated patients, but remain higher than those in the general population. Although the majority of HCM patients develop few or no symptoms, a significant minority will develop advanced heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or stroke. The presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, development of systolic dysfunction (i.e., end-stage HCM), and possibly apical aneurysms has been associated with worse outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teare D. Asymmetrical hypertrophy of the heart in young adults. Br Heart J. 1958;20:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation. 1995;92:785–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hada Y, Sakamoto T, Amano K, Yamaguchi T, Takenaka K, Takahashi H, Takikawa R, Hasegawa I, Takahashi T, Suzuki J, et al. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a population of adult Japanese workers as detected by echocardiographic screening. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:183–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maron BJ, Spirito P, Roman MJ, Paranicas M, Okin PM, Best LG, Lee ET, Devereux RB. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a population-based sample of American Indians aged 51 to 77 years (the Strong Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1510–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou Y, Song L, Wang Z, Ma A, Liu T, Gu H, Lu S, Wu P, Zhang dagger Y, Shen dagger L, Cai Y, Zhen double dagger Y, Liu Y, Hui R. Prevalence of idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China: a population-based echocardiographic analysis of 8080 adults. Am J Med. 2004;116:14–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Corrado D, Basso C, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletes. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:364–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xin B, Puffenberger E, Tumbush J, Bockoven JR, Wang H. Homozygosity for a novel splice site mutation in the cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene causes severe neonatal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:2662–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thaman R, Gimeno JR, Reith S, Esteban MT, Limongelli G, Murphy RT, Mist B, McKenna WJ, Elliott PM. Progressive left ventricular remodeling in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moon JC, Reed E, Sheppard MN, Elkington AG, Ho SY, Burke M, Petrou M, Pennell DJ. The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2260–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olivotto I, Maron BJ, Appelbaum E, Harrigan CJ, Salton C, Gibson CM, Udelson JE, O'Donnell C, Lesser JR, Manning WJ, Maron MS. Spectrum and clinical significance of systolic function and myocardial fibrosis assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:261–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan RH, Maron BJ, Olivotto I, Pencina MJ, Assenza GE, Haas T, Lesser JR, Gruner C, Crean AM, Rakowski H, Udelson JE, Rowin E, Lombardi M, Cecchi F, Tomberli B, Spirito P, Formisano F, Biagini E, Rapezzi C, De Cecco CN, Autore C, Cook EF, Hong SN, Gibson CM, Manning WJ, Appelbaum E, Maron MS. Prognostic value of quantitative contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the evaluation of sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2014;130:484–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weng Z, Yao J, Chan RH, He J, Yang X, Zhou Y, He Y. Prognostic value of LGE-CMR in HCM: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christiaans I, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ, Mannens MM, Michels M, Majoor-Krakauer D, Dooijes D, van Tintelen JP, van den Berg MP, Volders PG, Arens YH, van den Wijngaard A, Atsma DE, Helderman-van den Enden AT, Houweling AC, de Boer K, van der Smagt JJ, Hauer RN, Marcelis CL, Timmermans J, van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Manifest disease, risk factors for sudden cardiac death, and cardiac events in a large nationwide cohort of predictively tested hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers: determining the best cardiological screening strategy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1161–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Casey SA, Haas TS, Chan RH, Udelson JE, Garberich RF, Lesser JR, Appelbaum E, Manning WJ, Maron MS. Risk stratification and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy >=60 years of age. Circulation. 2013;127:585–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Casey SA, Link MS, Lesser JR, Chan RH, Garberich RF, Udelson JE, Maron MS. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adulthood associated with low cardiovascular mortality with contemporary management strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1915–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Casey SA, Lesser JR, Garberich RF, McGriff DM, Maron MS. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children, adolescents, and young adults associated with low cardiovascular mortality with contemporary management strategies. Circulation. 2016;133:62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivotto I, Maron MS, Adabag AS, Casey SA, Vargiu D, Link MS, Udelson JE, Cecchi F, Maron BJ. Gender-related differences in the clinical presentation and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:480–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bos JM, Theis JL, Tajik AJ, Gersh BJ, Ommen SR, Ackerman MJ. Relationship between sex, shape, and substrate in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2008;155:1128–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Okawa M, Hirota T, Hayato K, Yamasaki N, Matsumura Y, Yabe T, Doi YL. Gender-specific differences in the clinical features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a community-based Japanese population: results from Kochi RYOMA study. J Cardiol. 2010;56:314–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, Thaman R, Shah J, Ward D, Dickie S, Tome Esteban MT, McKenna WJ. Historical trends in reported survival rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2006;92:785–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellenbogen KA, Levine JH, Berger RD, Daubert JP, Winters SL, Greenstein E, Shalaby A, Schaechter A, Subacius H, Kadish A. Are implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks a surrogate for sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy? Circulation. 2006;113:776–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lipshultz SE, Orav EJ, Wilkinson JD, Towbin JA, Messere JE, Lowe AM, Sleeper LA, Cox GF, Hsu DT, Canter CE, Hunter JA, Colan SD, Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry Study G. Risk stratification at diagnosis for children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an analysis of data from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry. Lancet. 2013;382:1889–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Colan SD, Lipshultz SE, Lowe AM, Sleeper LA, Messere J, Cox GF, Lurie PR, Orav EJ, Towbin JA. Epidemiology and cause-specific outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children: findings from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry. Circulation. 2007;115:773–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Casey SA, Dolara A, Traverse JH, Maron BJ. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2001;104:2517–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guttmann OP, Rahman MS, O'Mahony C, Anastasakis A, Elliott PM. Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review. Heart. 2014;100:465–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guttmann OP, Pavlou M, O'Mahony C, Monserrat L, Anastasakis A, Rapezzi C, Biagini E, Gimeno JR, Limongelli G, Garcia-Pavia P, McKenna WJ, Omar RZ, Elliott PM, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes I. Predictors of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2016;103(9):672–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maron BJ, Olivotto I, Bellone P, Conte MR, Cecchi F, Flygenring BP, Casey SA, Gohman TE, Bongioanni S, Spirito P. Clinical profile of stroke in 900 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Masri A, Kanj M, Thamilarasan M, Wazni O, Smedira NG, Lever HM, Desai MY. Outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a survival meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Siontis KC, Geske JB, Ong K, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Gersh BJ. Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: prevalence, clinical correlations, and mortality in a large high-risk population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van Velzen HG, Theuns DA, Yap SC, Michels M, Schinkel AF. Incidence of device-detected atrial fibrillation and long-term outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guttmann OP, Pavlou M, O'Mahony C, Monserrat L, Anastasakis A, Rapezzi C, Biagini E, Gimeno JR, Limongelli G, Garcia-Pavia P, McKenna WJ, Omar RZ, Elliott PM, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes I. Prediction of thrombo-embolic risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM risk-CVA). Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:837–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, Charron P, Hagege AA, Lafont A, Limongelli G, Mahrholdt H, McKenna WJ, Mogensen J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Nistri S, Pieper PG, Pieske B, Rapezzi C, Rutten FH, Tillmanns C, Watkins H. 2014 ESC guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the task force for the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2733–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, Naidu SS, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Rakowski H, Seidman CE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE, Yancy CW, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e212–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Haruki S, Minami Y, Hagiwara N. Stroke and embolic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: risk stratification in patients without atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2016;47:936–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Harris KM, Spirito P, Maron MS, Zenovich AG, Formisano F, Lesser JR, Mackey-Bojack S, Manning WJ, Udelson JE, Maron BJ. Prevalence, clinical profile, and significance of left ventricular remodeling in the end-stage phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2006;114:216–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Melacini P, Basso C, Angelini A, Calore C, Bobbo F, Tokajuk B, Bellini N, Smaniotto G, Zucchetto M, Iliceto S, Thiene G, Maron BJ. Clinicopathological profiles of progressive heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2111–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Briasoulis A, Mallikethi-Reddy S, Palla M, Alesh I, Afonso L. Myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2015;101:1406–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Biagini E, Spirito P, Leone O, Picchio FM, Coccolo F, Ragni L, Lofiego C, Grigioni F, Potena L, Rocchi G, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Boriani G, Prandstraller D, Arbustini E, Branzi A, Rapezzi C. Heart transplantation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:387–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rowin EJ, Maron BJ, Kiernan MS, Casey SA, Feldman DS, Hryniewicz KM, Chan RH, Harris KM, Udelson JE, DeNofrio D, Roberts WC, Maron MS. Advanced heart failure with preserved systolic function in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: under-recognized subset of candidates for heart transplant. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:967–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maron MS, Kalsmith BM, Udelson JE, Li W, DeNofrio D. Survival after cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:574–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kato TS, Takayama H, Yoshizawa S, Marboe C, Schulze PC, Farr M, Naka Y, Mancini D, Maurer MS. Cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:568–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG, Link MS, Pandian NG, Kuvin JT, Nistri S, Cecchi F, Udelson JE, Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Circulation. 2006;114:2232–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, Casey SA, Lesser JR, Losi MA, Cecchi F, Maron BJ. Effect of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on clinical outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, Tome MT, Shah J, Ward D, Thaman R, Mogensen J, McKenna WJ. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1933–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Autore C, Bernabo P, Barilla CS, Bruzzi P, Spirito P. The prognostic importance of left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy varies in relation to the severity of symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1076–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Maron MS, Rowin EJ, Olivotto I, Casey SA, Arretini A, Tomberli B, Garberich RF, Link MS, Chan RH, Lesser JR, Maron BJ. Contemporary natural history and management of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Minami Y, Kajimoto K, Terajima Y, Yashiro B, Okayama D, Haruki S, Nakajima T, Kawashiro N, Kawana M, Hagiwara N. Clinical implications of midventricular obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:2346–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Efthimiadis GK, Pagourelias ED, Parcharidou D, Gossios T, Kamperidis V, Theofilogiannakos EK, Pappa Z, Meditskou S, Hadjimiltiades S, Pliakos C, Karvounis H, Styliadis IH. Clinical characteristics and natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with midventricular obstruction. Circ J. 2013;77:2366–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Silbiger JJ. Abnormalities of the mitral apparatus in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic, pathophysiologic, and surgical insights. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29:622–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chikamori T, Doi YL, Akizawa M, Yonezawa Y, Ozawa T, McKenna WJ. Comparison of clinical, morphological, and prognostic features in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between Japanese and western patients. Clin Cardiol. 1992;15:833–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ho HH, Lee KL, Lau CP, Tse HF. Clinical characteristics of and long-term outcome in Chinese patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Med. 2004;116:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kitaoka H, Doi Y, Casey SA, Hitomi N, Furuno T, Maron BJ. Comparison of prevalence of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Japan and the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1183–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Okawa M, Hirota T, Hoshikawa E, Hayato K, Yamasaki N, Matsumura Y, Yabe T, Nishinaga M, Takata J, Doi YL. Clinical profiles of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with apical phenotype--comparison of pure-apical form and distal-dominant form. Circ J. 2009;73:2330–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moon J, Shim CY, Ha JW, Cho IJ, Kang MK, Yang WI, Jang Y, Chung N, Cho SY. Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcomes in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1614–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yan L, Wang Z, Xu Z, Li Y, Tao Y, Fan C. Two hundred eight patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China: clinical feature, prognosis, and comparison of pure and mixed forms. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35:101–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Eriksson MJ, Sonnenberg B, Woo A, Rakowski P, Parker TG, Wigle ED, Rakowski H. Long-term outcome in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:638–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Klues HG, Schiffers A, Maron BJ. Phenotypic spectrum and patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: morphologic observations and significance as assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography in 600 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1699–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bos JM, Will ML, Gersh BJ, Kruisselbrink TM, Ommen SR, Ackerman MJ. Characterization of a phenotype-based genetic test prediction score for unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:727–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gruner C, Ivanov J, Care M, Williams L, Moravsky G, Yang H, Laczay B, Siminovitch K, Woo A, Rakowski H. Toronto hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genotype score for prediction of a positive genotype in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Klarich KW, Attenhofer Jost CH, Binder J, Connolly HM, Scott CG, Freeman WK, Ackerman MJ, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, Ommen SR. Risk of death in long-term follow-up of patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1784–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rowin EJ, Maron BJ, Haas TS, Garberich RF, Wang W, Link MS, Maron MS. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular apical aneurysm: implications for risk stratification and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:761–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hanneman K, Crean AM, Williams L, Moshonov H, James S, Jimenez-Juan L, Gruner C, Sparrow P, Rakowski H, Nguyen ET. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings predict major adverse events in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Imaging. 2014;29:331–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Rakowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Posttest

Posttest

  1. 1.

    What is true regarding HCM disease penetrance and progression?

    1. A.

      Left ventricular wall thickness continues to progress throughout lifetime in most patients.

    2. B.

      A patient who has not developed signs of HCM by the age of 30 is almost certainly going to remain phenotype negative and can be discharged from follow-up.

    3. C.

      Most patients who survive to their sixth decade will develop end-stage HCM.

    4. D.

      Almost all patients who carry the familial mutation will develop at least some signs of the disease during their lifetime.

    5. E.

      Most patients who develop signs of HCM do so during adolescence or early adulthood.

    Answer: E. Although most HCM patients first develop signs of the disease during adolescence or early adulthood, some will do so only later in life. No recommendation regarding the exact age after which follow-up can be discontinued is available, but development of HCM after the age of 30 is certainly possible. Wall thickness usually plateaus after the initial spurt and does not continue to progress with aging in most cases. End-stage HCM develops in <5% of patients. The exact disease penetrance in HCM is unknown, but it is highly unlikely to approach 100%.

  2. 2.

    What is false regarding mortality in patients with HCM?

    1. A.

      The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death in contemporary HCM cohorts is <1%.

    2. B.

      In infants diagnosed with HCM, HCM-related mortality is exceedingly low during childhood.

    3. C.

      Sudden cardiac death remains a leading cause of death, especially in young HCM patients.

    4. D.

      HCM patients have a higher mortality rate than in the general population, but this is attenuated with age.

    5. E.

      Contemporary therapies (e.g., ICD implantation, heart transplantation) have contributed to the declining mortality rates in HCM patients.

    Answer: B. The prognosis of patients diagnosed during their first year of life is relatively poor with a 19% risk of death or transplant within 1 year of diagnosis. In the overall HCM population, however, mortality rates have declined over the past few decades, partially due to the advent of contemporary therapies and partially due to inclusion of milder cases in HCM cohorts. Current annual SCD rates are below 1% although it remains an important cause of death, especially in the young. The standardized mortality rate in older HCM patients approaches that in the general population.

  3. 3.

    What is true regarding myocardial fibrosis as demonstrated by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)?

    1. A.

      It develops in <20% of patients with HCM.

    2. B.

      In about half of the cases, it is extensive (>20% of myocardial mass).

    3. C.

      It is associated with lower incidence of sudden cardiac death.

    4. D.

      Only a minority of HCM patients with LGE on CMR will develop end-stage HCM.

    5. E.

      LGE is not regarded as a good surrogate for myocardial fibrosis in HCM patients.

    Answer: D. Although myocardial fibrosis probably plays a significant role in the development of systolic dysfunction, most patients with LGE will not develop end-stage HCM. LGE is found in 40–70% of HCM patients and in most cases is mild to moderate (<20% of myocardial mass). It has been associated with increased risk of sudden death (see Chap. 14) and is regarded as a good surrogate for myocardial fibrosis.

  4. 4.

    What is true regarding atrial fibrillation in HCM?

    1. A.

      The prevalence of AF in HCM is similar to that in the general population.

    2. B.

      Because HCM patients with AF are usually younger and have less comorbidities than patients without HCM who have AF, anticoagulation is not necessary in the majority of cases.

    3. C.

      AF has been associated with increased mortality in the general population but not in patients with HCM.

    4. D.

      Stroke rates in HCM patients with AF do not increase with age.

    5. E.

      Female gender is a risk factor for the development of AF in patients with HCM.

    Answer: E. Age, female gender, left atrial size, and higher NYHA class are all important risk factors for AF in HCM. The prevalence of AF in patients with HCM is around 20%, much higher than in the general population. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is not regarded as an accurate method for estimating stroke risk in HCM and anticoagulation is recommend for all patients who do not have a contraindication.

  5. 5.

    What is false regarding an HCM patient who develops shortness of breath?

    1. A.

      NYHA class III–IV symptoms develop in the minority of patients.

    2. B.

      Atrial fibrillation is an important cause for the development of new symptoms in HCM patients.

    3. C.

      The majority of HCM patients with NYHA class III–IV symptoms have LVOTO.

    4. D.

      NYHA class III–IV symptoms are a bad prognostic sign.

    5. E.

      Coronary artery disease should be ruled out in older patients who develop new symptoms.

    Answer: C. Advanced shortness of breath (NYHA class III–IV) is most commonly attributed to diastolic dysfunction and only in the minority of cases to LVOTO (in 22% according to one study). That being said, septal reduction therapy may alleviate both obstruction and diastolic dysfunction in symptomatic patients. In a patient with new onset shortness of breath, AF and CAD should be ruled out as these are important causes for symptoms. Patients with advanced symptoms have worse prognosis with a 6-year risk of death or heart transplant of 36% according to one study. Luckily, less than 25% of patients develop advanced symptoms with the youngest patients least likely to do so.

  6. 6.

    What is false regarding a patient who is found to have a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in the absence of coronary artery disease?

    1. A.

      His prognosis is significantly worse than an HCM patient without systolic dysfunction.

    2. B.

      Such a finding is uncovered in ≈ 20% of HCM patients.

    3. C.

      Myocardial fibrosis is thought to play an important role in the development of systolic dysfunction in this patient.

    4. D.

      Once systolic dysfunction is diagnosed, clinical deterioration is relatively rapid.

    5. E.

      If cardiac transplant is indicated, the survival posttransplant is better than in patients with ischemic heart disease.

    Answer: B. End-stage HCM , defined as LVEF <50% in the absence of non-HCM-related causes, occurs in <5% of patients. Data on this subgroup of patients is limited, but their risk of death or transplant is considerable (59% over 3.3 years of follow-up according to one publication). Although the time from HCM diagnosis to the development of systolic dysfunction is typically prolonged (> 10 years) once systolic dysfunction is detected deterioration is relatively rapid. On the positive side, survival posttransplant is comparable to that of other nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients and better than in patents with ischemic heart disease. Myocardial fibrosis is thought to play a major role in development of systolic dysfunction in HCM, and its burden is much higher in end-stage cases.

  7. 7.

    What is true regarding a patient with an LVOT gradient of 20 mmHg at rest and 60 mmHg postexercise?

    1. A.

      Advanced symptoms (NYHA class III–IV) are more likely to occur in this patient than in a patient without LVOT gradients even after provocation.

    2. B.

      The fact that he has no gradient at rest suggests SAM is not part of the mechanism leading to LVOTO.

    3. C.

      Such findings occur in <15% of HCM patients.

    4. D.

      Patients with LVOTO are at increased risk of SCD but not overall mortality.

    5. E.

      AF is unlikely to develop in this patient.

    Answer: A. LVOTO , defined as an LVOT gradient ≥30 mmHg at rest or after provocation, is a risk marker for development of advanced symptoms, mortality (including SCD, HCM-related, and overall mortality), and AF. LVOTO only after provocation occurs in ≈ 1/3 of patients. The mechanism of LVOTO in these patients is the same as in patients with significant gradients at rest.

  8. 8.

    What is true regarding a patient with hypertrophy isolated to segments distal to the papillary muscles?

    1. A.

      Such morphology is rare in Asian HCM patients.

    2. B.

      The thickened apex protects this patient from the development of an apical aneurysm.

    3. C.

      The finding of an apical scar in this patient invariably suggests coronary artery disease.

    4. D.

      The absence of basal septal hypertrophy suggests advanced fibrosis and wall thinning of these segments.

    5. E.

      This patient’s prognosis is favorable when compared with a patient with “reverse curvature” morphology.

    Answer: E. Apical HCM is associated with less morbidity and mortality than other types of HCM. These patients may develop, however, apical aneurysms in the absence of CAD. The reason for development of hypertrophy limited to the apical segments is unknown and is not due to “burnt out” basal segments. Most studies demonstrate it is more common in Asians.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adler, A., Li, Q., Williams, L., Rakowski, H. (2019). Natural History of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. In: Naidu, S. (eds) Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92423-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92423-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92422-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92423-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics