Abstract
This chapter describes the teaching practices that three mathematics teachers in at-risk contexts used to increase student engagement and enhance student learning. Qualitative data were collected in the form of teacher interviews, classroom observations and teacher journals. Findings show that these teachers considered aspects of both social (e.g., creating a classroom community and developing a teacher-student relationship) and academic (e.g., using technology, manipulatives, group work and student-centered activities) domains of student engagement in their teaching, but to varying degrees and with different emphases. All teachers noted that these strategies also appeal to their students’ characteristics as early adolescents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See McDougall and Ferguson (Part II this volume, para. 1) for a discussion of two of the possible Ontario pathways (Academic and Applied).
- 2.
In the following sections, participant quotes are referred to by participant name and the interview number (e.g., B1: Benjamin, interview 1).
References
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioural, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408–415.
Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Martin, A., & Way, J. (2011). A model for mathematics instruction to enhance student motivation and engagement. In D. Brahier (Ed.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Seventy-third Yearbook (pp. 31–42). Reston: NCTM.
Brown, R. S. (2008). The grade 9 cohort of fall 2002: A five-year cohort study, 2002–2007. Toronto: Toronto District School Board.
Bruce, C., & Ross, J. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346–370.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
Eccles, J., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 521–542.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hand, V. M. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 97–132.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, I., & Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents. Bristol: Falmer.
Hutchinson, N. L. (2016). Inclusion of exceptional learners in Canadian schools: A practical handbook for teachers (5th ed.). Toronto: Pearson Education Canada.
Jao, L. (2013). Peer coaching as a model for professional development in the elementary mathematics context: Challenges, needs and rewards. Policy Futures in Education, 11(3), 290–297.
Jao, L., & McDougall, D. (2015). The collaborative teacher inquiry project: A purposeful professional development initiative. Canadian Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–22. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/1600
Jao, L., & McDougall, D. (2016). Moving beyond the barriers: Supporting meaningful teacher collaboration to improve secondary school mathematics. Teacher Development, 20(4), 557–573.
Karp, K. S., & Voltz, D. L. (2000). Weaving mathematical instructional strategies into inclusive settings. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(4), 206–215.
King, A. J. C., Warren, W. K., Boyer, J. C., & Chin, P. (2005). Double cohort study phase 4 report for the Ontario Ministry of Education. Kingston: Queen’s University.
Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233–247.
Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274–283.
Lowe, K., Lee, L., Schibeci, R., Cummings, R., Phillips, R., & Lake, D. (2010). Learning objects and engagement of students in Australian and New Zealand schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 227–241.
Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Dole, S., Pendergast, D., Kapitzke, C., van Kraayenoord, C., Moni, K., McIntosh, A., Mayer, D., Bahr, M., Hunter, L., Chadbourne, R., Bean, T., Alverman, D., & Steven, L. (2003). Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schools. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.
Mergendoller, J. R., Marchman, V. A., Mitman, A. L., & Packer, M. J. (1988). Task demands and accountability in middle-grade science classes. Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 251–265.
Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). TIPS4RM for grades 7, 8, 9 applied and 10 applied math. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Pressley, M., Dolezal, S. E., Raphael, L. M., Mohan, L., Roehrig, A. D., & Bogner, K. (2003). Motivating primary-grade students. New York: Guilford.
Raphael, L. M., Pressley, M., & Mohan, L. (2008). Engaging instruction in middle school classrooms: An observational study of nine teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 61–81.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (2000). Social support networks and school outcomes: The centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(3), 205–226.
Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2015). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. London, UK: Routledge.
Siegel, C. (2005). Implementing a research-based model of cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 339–349.
Solomon, D., Battistich, V., Watson, M., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2000). A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediated effects of the Child Development Project. Social Psychology of Education, 41, 3–51.
Statistics Canada. (2013). Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada, DHHS Catalogue no. 99–010-X2011001. Ottawa: Author.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–270.
Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.
Sullivan, P., Mornane, A., Prain, V., Campbell, C., Deed, C., Drane, S., Faulkner, M., McDonough, A., & Smith, C. (2009). Junior secondary students’ perceptions of influences on their engagement with schools. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 176–191.
Additional Suggestions for Further Reading
Miller, J. P. (2010). Whole child education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Stocker, D. (2017). Maththatmatters 2: A teacher resource linking math and social justice. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jao, L. (2018). Considering Both Academic and Social Domains: Increasing Student Engagement in At-Risk Classrooms. In: Kajander, A., Holm, J., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92389-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92390-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)