Advertisement

Tax Power and Tax Competition

  • Nils SoguelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

There are few domains as suited as taxation at expressing the particularities of the Swiss system. Various elements combine here: the smallness of the country and of its cantons (and thus their exposure to external political and economic context), the federal system, the country’s decentralization, and direct democracy. The tax system, seen as a whole, is not a rational, systematic, or even theoretical construction, and Swiss fiscality offers a diversity that likely does not exist anywhere else. Depending on the canton, revenue, wealth, profit, capital, and even inheritances are taxed differently. Municipalities can also choose the taxes they wish to levy and the tax rate. Two key elements explain why significant differences in the cantonal and municipal tax burdens exist: tax competition and the balance between direct and indirect taxes. Despite these differences, a large majority of the Swiss population continues to favor cantonal and municipal tax autonomy.

Keywords

Tax burden Tax competition Tax autonomy Piggy-back system 

References

  1. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1977). Towards a tax constitution for Leviathan. Journal of Public Economics, 8(3), 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eugster, B., & Parchet, R. (2013). Culture and Taxes. Towards Identifying Tax Competition. University of St. Gallen, Discussion Paper, 2013–2039.Google Scholar
  3. Feld, L. P., & Kirchgässner, G. (2001). Income tax competition at the state and local level in Switzerland. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(2–3), 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feld, L. P., & Reulier, E. (2009). Strategic tax competition in Switzerland: Evidence from a panel of the Swiss cantons. German Economic Review, 10(1), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FTA (Federal Tax Administration). (2017). The Swiss tax system. Bern: Swiss Tax Conference Information Committee.Google Scholar
  6. Keen, M., & Lockwood, B. (2010). The value added tax: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 138–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirchgässner, G., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1996). Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European Union: Lessons from Switzerland. Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krishnakumar, J., Martin, M.-J., & Soguel, N. (2010). Explaining fiscal balances with a simultaneous equation model of revenue and expenditure: A case study of Swiss cantons using panel data. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(2), 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2000). Tax burden: Alternative measures. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. OECD. (2002). OECD territorial reviews: Switzerland. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. (2012). OECD economic surveys: Switzerland 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD. (2015). OECD economic surveys: Switzerland 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2017). Taxing wages 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rossi, S., & Dafflon, B. (2004). Tax competition between subnational governments: Theoretical and regional policy issues with reference to Switzerland. In E. Hein, A. Heise, & A. Truger (Eds.), Finanzpolitik in der Kontroverse (pp. 227–250). Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  15. Schmidheiny, K. (2017). Emerging lessons from half a century of fiscal federalism in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 153(2), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDHEAPUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations