Skip to main content

PerspectivesX: A Collaborative Multi-perspective Elaboration Learning Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Education and e-Learning 2018 (KES SEEL-18 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 99))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1114 Accesses

Abstract

There currently exists a lack of scaffolded collaborative activities within MOOC’s. In this paper, we introduce the PerspectivesX tool which has been designed to scaffold multi-perspective collaborative learning activities within MOOCs. The PerspectivesX tool is able to promote learner knowledge construction and curation for a range of multi-perspective elaboration techniques (e.g., SWOT analysis, Six Thinking Hats and activities with custom dimensions). The tool serves as a searchable knowledge base, is able to persist collective intelligence across course re-runs and clusters similar student responses together. In this paper, we illustrate that a good theoretical background already exists to support the design of CSCL tools and that via the LTI specification, feature-rich collaborative tools can be embedded within multiple courses. An evaluation of MOOC platform extension frameworks is presented to substantiate the implementation of the tool using the LTI standard. Key design principles, tool features, and proposed embedded analytics are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Basu, S., Jacobs, C., Vanderwende, L.: Powergrading: a clustering approach to amplify human effort for short answer grading. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 1, 391–402 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, D.: Streams of content, limited attention: the flow of information through social media. Educause Rev. 45(5), 26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corrin, L., de Barba, P.G., Bakharia, A.: Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 424–428. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Bono, E., Pandolfo, M.: Six Thinking Hats, vol. 192. Back Bay Books, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eberle, B.: Scamper On: Games for Imagination Development. Prufrock Press Inc., Waco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faucon, L., Håklev, S., Hadzilacos, T., Dillenbourg, P.: Demo of orchestration graph engine: enabling rich social pedagogical scenarios in MOOCs, pp. 143–144. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, P.: MOOC discussion forums: barrier to engagement? (2013). http://mfeldstein.com/mooc-discussion-forums-barriers-engagement/

  9. Miller, R.L., Benz, J.J.: Techniques for encouraging peer collaboration: online threaded discussion or fishbowl interaction. J. Instr. Psychol. 35(1), 87–94 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohler, M., Mihalcea, R.: Text-to-text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 567–575. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connell, J.: Content curation in libraries: is it the new black? Collected Mag. 6, 4–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ping, W.: The latest development and application of massive open online course: from cMOOC to xMOOC. Mod. Dist. Educ. Res. 3(005), 13–19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slotta, J.D., Najafi, H.: Supporting collaborative knowledge construction with Web 2.0 technologies, pp. 93–112. Springer, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, W., Liu, X., Gong, Y.: Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 267–273. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aneesha Bakharia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bakharia, A., Lindley, M. (2019). PerspectivesX: A Collaborative Multi-perspective Elaboration Learning Tool. In: Uskov, V., Howlett, R., Jain, L., Vlacic, L. (eds) Smart Education and e-Learning 2018. KES SEEL-18 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 99. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92363-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics