Abstract
Counterterrorist legislation has been on the rise in many democracies after 9/11. While this may be necessary to strengthen the state’s capacity to detect and avoid terrorist attacks, it may also restrain the liberties of residents in the country where they apply. This chapter asks whether the introduction of counterterrorist legislation affects people’s attitudes towards democracy. We analyse this by combining country-level data on legislative responses to terrorism, and individual-level data on attitudes towards democracy. The findings indicate that the average number of counterterrorist regulation negatively affects satisfaction with democracy, but within each country changes in such legislation do not. Overall, changes in counterterrorist legislation are unrelated to satisfaction with democracy. Why this is the case is an important subject for further research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Citrin, J. 1974. Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government. American Political Science Review 68 (3): 973–988.
Citrin, J., D.P. Green, C. Muste, and C. Wong. 1997. Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations. Journal of Politics 59: 858–881.
Chenoweth, E. 2013. Terrorism and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 16: 355–378.
Christensen, D.A., and J. Aars. 2017. Does Democracy Decrease Fear of Terrorism? Terrorism and Political Violence. Online First.
Crenshaw, M. 1981. The Cause of Terrorism. Comparative Politics 13 (4): 379–399.
Crenshaw, M. (ed.). 2010. The Consequences of Counterterrorism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dahl, R. 1967. Pluralist Democracy in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand MacNally.
Davis, D.W. 2007. Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Davis, D.W., and B.D. Silver. 2004. Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 28–46.
Diamond, L. 2015. Facing Up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141–155.
Donohue, L.K. 2001. Counter-Terrorist Law and Emergency Powers in the United Kingdom, 1922–2000. Portland, OR: Irish Academic.
Easton, D. 1975. A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457.
Engene, J.O. 2016. Terrorism, Counterterrorism and Democracy. In Democratic Transformations in Europe 31—Challenges and Prospects, ed. Y. Peters and M. Tatnam. London: Routledge.
Epifanio, M. 2011. Legislative Response to International Terrorism. Journal of Peace Research 48 (3): 399–411.
Fairbrother, M. 2014. Two Multilevel Modeling Techniques for Analyzing Comparative Longitudinal Survey Datasets. Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1): 119–140.
Fimreite, A.L., P. Lango, P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja. 2013. After Oslo and Utøya: A Shift in the Balance Between Security and Liberty in Norway? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 36 (10): 839–856.
Gadarian, S.K. 2010. The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes. Journal of Politics 72 (2): 469–483.
Holmberg, S. 1999a. Representativ Demokrati. SOU 1999:64. Demokratiutredningens skrift nr. 24. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar.
Holmberg, S. 1999b. Down and Down We Go: Political Trust in Sweden. In Critical Citizens, ed. P. Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hood, C.C., and H.Z. Margetts. 2007. The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hox, J.J., M. Moerbeek, and R. van de Schoot. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. London: Routledge.
Husabø, E. 2013. Counterterrorism and the Expansion of Proactive Police Powers in the Nordic States. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 14 (1): 3–23.
Kumlin, S., and I. Stadelmann-Steffen. 2014. How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting and Attitudes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Linde, J., and J. Ekman. 2003. Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 391–408.
Listhaug, O., and M. Wiberg. 1995. Confidence in Political and Private Institutions. In Citizens and the State, ed. H.-D. Klingemann and D. Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merolla, J., and E. Zechmeister. 2009. Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neumayer, E., T. Plümper, and M. Epifanio. 2014. The ‘Peer-Effect’ in Counterterrorist Policies. International Organization 69 (1): 209–232.
Newton, K. 2001. Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review 22 (2): 201–214.
Nordenhaug, I., and J.O. Engene. 2008. Norge i kamp mot terrorisme. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Owens, J.E., and R. Pelizzo (eds.). 2010. The ‘War on Terror’ and the Growth of Executive Power? A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
Paxton, P. 2007. Association Membership and Generalized Trust: A Multilevel Model Across 31 Countries. Social Forces 86 (1): 47–76.
Powell, G.B. 2004. The Chain of Responsiveness. Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 91–105.
Rykkja, L.H., A.L. Fimreite, P. Lango, and P. Lægreid. 2011. Attitudes Towards Anti-terror Measures: The Role of Trust, Political Orientation and Civil Liberties Support. Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (2): 219–237.
Salamon, L.M. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saward, M. 1998. The Terms of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schmidt-Catran, A.W., and M. Fairbrother. 2016. The Random Effects in Multilevel Models: Getting Them Wrong and Getting Them Right. European Sociological Review 32 (1): 23–38.
Schneider, S.K. 2011. Dealing with Disaster. New York: Routledge.
Teorell, J., S. Dahlberg, S. Holmberg, B. Rothstein, F. Hartmann, and S. Svensson. 2015. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, Version January 15. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
Viscusi, W.K., and R.J. Zeckhauser. 2003. Sacrificing Civil Liberties to Reduce Terrorism Risks. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 (2–3): 99–120.
Waldron, J. 2003. Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance. Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (2): 191–210.
Weinberg, L.B., W.L. Eubank, and E.A. Francis. 2008. The Cost of Terrorism: The Relationship Between International Terrorism and Democratic Governance. Terrorism and Political Violence 20 (2): 257–270.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christensen, D.A., Aars, J., Rykkja, L.H. (2019). Counterterrorist Legislation and Beliefs in Democracy: A Longitudinal Study. In: Lægreid, P., Rykkja, L.H. (eds) Societal Security and Crisis Management. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92303-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92303-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92302-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92303-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)