Advertisement

Identifying Factors Relevant for Firms’ Location and Relocation. The Case of Ticino

  • Federica RossiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Location and relocation decisions of firms are popular topics in regional economics, thanks to their importance from both a theoretical and practical point of view. In particular, relocation provides at the same time the best showcase of entrepreneurial decision-making with regard to location choice, and the ideal context to inspire goals for regional development policy (Van Dijk and Pellenbarg in Pap Reg Sci 79(2):191–219, 2000). Using data from an online survey, conducted with firms located in Ticino (the southern Canton of Switzerland), this chapter sheds light on a set of factors influencing location and relocation choices of firms, which are pointed out as important by the literature. The study aims to analyse the factors influencing the location attractiveness from a business point of view (such as institutional background, accessibility and competitive environment). In particular, the chapter proposes an approach which points out the weaknesses and strengths of the territory and, therefore, suggests regional strategies in order to promote location attractiveness and prevent firms from leaving. Results show institutional background being one of the major strengths of Ticino. Moreover, this chapter aims to increase the knowledge of the drivers of migration behaviour of firms. Indeed, in contrast to location studies, relocation explicitly takes into account the fact that one site is substituted for another. Therefore, a subsample of firms that recently relocated to Ticino were asked to evaluate both their present and past locations. These answers allow conclusions to be drawn on possible drivers attracting firms to Ticino. In particular, the Swiss stable institutional background attracts Italian firms, while lower business costs are appealing for firms coming from other Swiss Cantons.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this chapter was supported by Fondazione Ferdinando e Laura Pica Alfieri, Lugano.

References

  1. Alamá-Sabater, L., Artal-Tur, A., & Navarro-Azorín, J. M. (2011). Industrial location, spatial discrete choice models and the need to account for neighbourhood effects. The Annals of Regional Science, 47, 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodenmann, B. Z., & Axhausen, K. W. (2012). Destination choice for relocating firms: A discrete choice model for the St. Gallen region, Switzerland. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 319–341.Google Scholar
  3. Brouwer, A. E., Mariotti, I., & van Ommeren, J. N. (2004). The firm relocation decision: An empirical investigation. The Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brülhart, M., Jametti, M., Schmidheiny, K. (2012). Do agglomeration economies reduce the sensitivity of firm location to tax differentials?. The Economic Journal, 122(563):1069–1093.Google Scholar
  5. De Bok, M., & Sanders, F. (2005). Firm location and the accessibility of location: Empirical results from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1902, 35–43.Google Scholar
  6. Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and FDI location choice: Evidence from US multinationals in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 412–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holguin-Veras, J., Xu, N., Levinson, H. S., et al. (2005). An investigation on the aggregate behavior of firm relocations to New Jersey (1990–1999) and the underlying market elasticities. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5, 293–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holl, A. (2004). Start-ups and relocations: Manufacturing plant location in Portugal. Papers in Regional Science, 83(4), 649–668.Google Scholar
  9. Hu, W., Cox, L. J., Wright, J., & Harris, T. R. (2008). Understanding firms’ relocation and expansion decisions using self-reported factor importance rating. The Review of Regional Studies, 38(1), 67–88.Google Scholar
  10. Kawamura, K. (2004). Transportation needs, location choice and perceived accessibility for businesses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1898, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kronenberg, K. (2013). Firm relocation in the Netherlands: Why do firms move and where do they go? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Love, L. L., & Crompton, J. L. (1999). The role of quality of life in business (re)location decisions. Journal of Business Research, 44(3), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manjón-Antolín, M., Arauzo-Carod, J. M., & Liviano-Solis, D. (2010). Empirical studies in industrial location: An assessment of their methods and results. Journal of Regional Science, 50(3), 685–711.Google Scholar
  14. McCann, P. (2001). Modern urban and regional economics. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pellenbarg, P. H., van Wissen, L. J. G., & van Dijk, J. (2002). Firm relocation: State of the art and research prospects. Research Report 02D31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).Google Scholar
  16. Salvesen, D., & Renski, H. (2003). The importance of quality of life in the location decisions of new economy firms. Chapel Hill, USA: Center for Urban and Regional Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Schmenner, R. W. (1980). Choosing new industrial capacity: One-site expansion, branching, and relocation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sleutjes, B., & Beckers, P. (2013). Exploring the role of the neighbourhood in firm relocation: Differences between stayers and movers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(3), 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sleuwaegen, L., & Pennings, E. (2006). International relocation of production: Where do firms go? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(4), 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strauss-Kahn, V., & Vives, X. (2009). Why and where do headquarters move? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Targa, F., Clifton, K. J., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2006). Influence of transportation access on individual firm location decisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1977, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Dijk, J., & Pellenbarg, P. H. (2000). Firm relocation decisions in the Netherlands: An ordered logit approach. Papers in Regional Science, 79(2), 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weber, A. (1909). Über den standort der industrien. ersterteil: reinetheorie des standorts. Tübingen, Mohr (English translation: Friedrich, C. J. (1929). Alfred Weber’s theory of location of industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic ResearchUniversità della Svizzera italiana (USI)LuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations