Skip to main content

MacIntyre’s Enlightenment Educational Ideal: Cultivating Rationality and Contemporary Discourse Through Controversy and Constrained Disagreement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Alasdair MacIntyre, Rationality and Education

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSKEY))

  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

Even though MacIntyre (1981/2007) is critical of what he calls the “Enlightenment project” in After Virtue, there is much in the Enlightenment that he thinks we should emulate, particularly in education. As I have already outlined in earlier chapters of this book, there is much from the Enlightenment that MacIntyre admires, especially how philosophers of the Enlightenment, such as Hegel, Marx, and so on open-our-eyes to the importance of cultivating rationality in and through a democratic culture of critical enquiry to remake both society and ourselves for the purposes of a particular kind of community. Indeed, MacIntyre’s commitment to certain Enlightenment ideals are continued and extended on in more detail throughout his extensive corpus; however, in this case my focus in this chapter will intentionally turn to what I am calling his “Enlightenment educational ideal”. In “The Idea of an Educated Public” (MacIntyre, 1987), and other subsequent works, MacIntyre’s commitment to an Enlightenment educational ideal is made known and embodied through an “educated public”. Therefore, for the purposes of this chapter I will be concerned with the discussion the following: first, I outline in detail MacIntyre’s commitment to an Enlightenment educational ideal, particularly its role in the cultivation of independent enlightened thinkers; second, I provide an account of MacIntyre’s theory of rational vindication because it serves as the foundation of his educational project; and lastly, I pick-up-on MacIntyre’s advocacy concerning the revitalisation of an educated public and the role universities should play in contemporary society as a place of controversy and constrained disagreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Section 1.4 of this book titled, A Central Aim of Education Concerns the Cultivation of Rationality In and Through a Democratic Culture of Critical Enquiry for my critique of “Against Utilitarianism” and the themes discussed by MacIntyre (1964).

  2. 2.

    This lecture was delivered at the Institute of Education, University of London in 1985.

  3. 3.

    See Section 1.3 of this book titled, Breaking the Chains of Apathy and Conformism: Reason and Freedom are Inseperable to Liberation for my critique of “Breaking the Chains of Reason” and the themes discussed by MacIntyre (1960).

  4. 4.

    See Chapter 2 of this book titled, MacIntyre’s Restoration of Rationality: The Essence of Human Nature Is Reason.

  5. 5.

    For a discussion of whether rival educational traditions referred to as “instrumental” and “non-instrumental” can be rationally resolved using MacIntyre’s framework, and a shared meaning of education is possible. See my paper titled, “MacIntyre, rival traditions and education” (Stolz, 2016).

  6. 6.

    MacIntyre’s account of a liberal education owes much to Newman’s (1852/2009) account found in The Idea of a University. MacIntyre (2009) in God, Philosophy, Universities acknowledges Newman as someone who has influenced his thinking on education, particularly a university education. Accordingly, Newman saw a liberal education as being: (1) pursuing knowledge for its own sake; (2) broadly based student experiences (rather than narrowly specialised); and, (3) the development of autonomous individuals.

  7. 7.

    MacIntyre provides other reasons why Thomism rationally defeats the other two rival traditions, however, space restrictions have limited any opportunity for me to provide a detailed account of this work in this section. For more detail, see the following: chapter VIII titled, “Tradition Against Encyclopaedia: Enlightened Morality as the Superstition of Modernity”, and chapter IX titled, “Tradition Against Genealogy: Who Speaks to Whom?” from Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (MacIntyre, 1990a). For other works that deal with MacIntyre’s Thomistic Aristotelian point of view, see the following: “Rival Aristotles: Aristotles Against Some Renaissance Aristotelians”, “Rival Aristotles: Aristotle Against Some Modern Aristotelians”, “Natural Law as Subversive: the Case of Aquinas”, and “Aquinas and the Extent of Moral Disagreement” from Ethics and Politics (MacIntyre, 2006a, b, c, d).

References

  • MacIntyre, A. (1960). Breaking the chains of reason. In E. Thompson (Ed.), Out of apathy (pp. 195–240). London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1964). Against utilitarianism. In T. H. Hollins (Ed.), Aims in education (pp. 1–23). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1977). Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science. Monist, 60(4), 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981/2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, Ind: Notre Dame University Press (first published in 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1987). The idea of an educated public. In G. Haydon (Ed.), Education and values: The Richard Peters lectures (pp. 15–36). London: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?. London, UK: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1990a). Three rival versions of moral enquiry: Encyclopaedia, genealogy, and tradition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press. (Gifford Lectures delivered at the University of Edinburgh in 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1990b). First principles, final ends and contemporary philosophical issues. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1994a). Moral relativism, truth and justification. In L. Gormally (Ed.), Moral truth and moral tradition: Essays in Honour of Peter Geach and Elizabeth Anscombe (pp. 6–24). Dublin: Four Courts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1994b). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2006a). Rival Aristotles: Aristotles against some Renaissance Aristotelians. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Ethics and politics: Selected essays, Vol. 2 (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press [originally published by the Department of Philosophy at the University of New Mexico as part of the Brian O’Neil Memorial Lectures Series for 1997/1998].

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2006b). Rival Aristotles: Aristotle against some modern Aristotelians. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Ethics and politics: Selected essays, Vol. 2 (pp. 22–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press [originally published by the Department of Philosophy at the University of New Mexico as part of the Brian O’Neil Memorial Lectures Series for 1997/1998].

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2006c). Natural law as subversive: The case of Aquinas. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Ethics and politics: Selected essays, Vol. 2 (pp. 42–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press [originally published in 1996 by the Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies].

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2006d). Aquinas and the extent of moral disagreement. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Ethics and politics: Selected essays (Vol. 2, pp. 64–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2009). God, philosophy, universities: A selective history of the catholic philosophical tradition. Maryland, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. H. (1852/2009). The idea of a university. In T. Iglesias (Ed.), (2nd ed.). Dublin, Ireland: UCD International Centre of Newman Studies (First published in 1852).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S. A. (2016). MacIntyre, rival traditions and education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S. A. (2017a). MacIntyre, managerialism and universities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S. A. (2017b). MacIntyre, rationality and universities. In J. T. Ozolins (Ed.), Civil society, education and human formation: Philosophy’s role in a renewed understanding of the meaning of education (pp. 104–121). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Stolz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Steven A. Stolz

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stolz, S.A. (2019). MacIntyre’s Enlightenment Educational Ideal: Cultivating Rationality and Contemporary Discourse Through Controversy and Constrained Disagreement. In: Alasdair MacIntyre, Rationality and Education. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92276-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92276-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92275-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92276-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics