Advertisement

Well-Being Design for an Aging Society

  • Ming‐Ming ZongEmail author
  • Chen Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10912)

Abstract

While population aging is an irreversible global challenge, this demo-graphic shift also brings a great opportunity to design innovation. For assisting older adults’ healthy and active aging, products and services should be adapted to their social identities and diverse well-being needs in their daily activities. This study addressed the question of how the integration of Science, Arts and Design (SAD) can contribute to design for older adults’ overall well-being. A case study of programs in Qiqihar University, Ming-Lab and Zhuhai of BIT was used to show how to transform design for older adults from SAD in design education to CHEER in design practices. Firstly, a review of the status of SAD was conducted. As multiple technology advances, many of aging problems can utilize SAD to cope with older adults’ daily problems and promote their quality of lives. The analysis of SAD enables us to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current education systems in China as well as to discover further design trends. Then, the “CHEER” framework for well-being design is introduced that includes five main components: Collaboration, Humanity, Empathy, Ecology and Renaissance (CHEER). Each component give insight into what students could do to realize older adults’ well-being through their design proposals. Furthermore, this study presented several design proposals to outlines design features, merits and challenges of the “CHEER” framework. Together with the “CHEER” framework, this study is indented to offer inspiration for de-sign researchers and educationists to join forces in their endeavors to de-sign for older adults’ well-being.

Keywords

Aging society Older adults Well-being design Design framework Product and service design 

References

  1. 1.
    Mace, R.: What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarkson, P.J., et al.: Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population. Springer Science & Business Media, USA (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erlandson, R.F.: Universal and Accessible Design for Products, Services, and Processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisk, A.D., et al.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hooyman, N.R., Kiyak, H.A.: Social Gerontology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Pearson Education, London (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Righi, V., Sayago, S., Blat, J.: When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a ‘turn to community’in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 108, 15–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kouprie, M., Visser, F.S.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20(5), 437–448 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams, D.E.: Sustainable Design: Ecology, Architecture, and Planning. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desmet, P.M., Pohlmeyer, A.E.: Positive design: an introduction to design for subjective well-being. Int. J. Des. 7(3), 5–19 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Design and ArtBeijing Institute of TechnologyZhuhaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Graduate School of DesignNational Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyDouliuPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations