Cities as Sustainable Service Platforms

A Framework for Institutional Service Delivery in the Urban Context
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10912)


Cities are complex systems of infrastructures and entities, which are usually developed independently, focusing on their efficiency. Cities deliver various services, such as health care, education and transportation. These services are delivered through urban entities such as hospitals, schools, universities and care homes, each built and managed independently. As a consequence, even though there might be enough resources in the built environment, there might be a lack of access in terms of actual service delivery. This is due to the trend that many times urban innovation happens by building new instead of using existing resources in more sustainable ways. Recently, new digital technologies and platforms have emerged to enable the sharing of various resources. However, since resource sharing has emerged on the customer side, institutions are still largely controlling their own independent resources. This article analyzes opportunities for institutional resource sharing and the role of service operations and platform applications. The research reveals new opportunities for operating environments and proposes a new service-oriented model for organizing institutional service delivery and using cities as sustainable service platforms.


City Service platform Sustainability 


  1. 1.
    Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L.: Service-dominant logic as a foundation for building a general theory. In: The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quinn, R.E., Rohrbaugh, J.: A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manag. Sci. 29(3), 363–377 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984). ISBN 0521367840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1, 201–233 (1983). JSTOR 202051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blakstad, S., Hansen, G., Knudsen, W.: Methods and tools for evaluation of usability in buildings. CIB W111 Usability of Workplaces. Phase 2. CIB Report, Publication 316 International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction CIB General Secretariat, The Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). ISBN 978-0-521-66363-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacob, F., Ulaga, W.: The transition from product to service in business markets: an agenda for academic inquiry. Ind. Mark. Manag. 37(3), 247–253 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalto UniversityEspooFinland
  2. 2.Tongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations