Influence of Rebound Effect on Energy Saving in Smart Homes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10912)


The rebound effect refers to the increase in energy use resulting from reduced energy costs and improved energy efficiency. This study proves that the rebound effect exists in smart homes and measures the size of rebound effect through two experiments. Results show that when electricity bills decreased and electricity use suggestions were provided, the electricity use significantly increased. The size of rebound effect was 13.5% in both cases. When electricity use suggestions were provided, the size of rebound effect of illumination settings was highest (20.24%), while the size of rebound effect of appliance settings was lowest (6.42%). The rebound effect in future smart homes can be reduced by (1) providing real-time electricity bills information combined with electricity use feedback; (2) offering electricity use suggestions through intelligent learning.


Smart homes Rebound effect Electricity use 



This research was supported by Shenzhen Malong Artificial Intelligence Research Center.


  1. 1.
    Alcott, B.: Jevons’ paradox. Ecol. Econ. 54(1), 9–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greening, L.A., Greene, D.L., Difiglio, C.: Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28(6–7), 389–401 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Small, K.A., Van Dender, K.: Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy J. 28, 25–51 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, J., Sookoor, T., Srinivasan, V., Gao, G., Holben, B., Stankovic, J., Field, E., Whitehouse, K.: The smart thermostat: using occupancy sensors to save energy in homes. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 211–224 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tejani, D., Al-Kuwari, A.M.A., Potdar, V.: Energy conservation in a smart home. In: 2011 Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference (DEST), pp. 241–246 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hong, S.H., Oreszczyn, T., Ridley, I.: Warm front study group: the impact of energy efficient refurbishment on the space heating fuel consumption in english dwellings. Energy Build. 38(10), 1171–1181 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J.: The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol. Econ. 65(3), 636–649 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kavousian, A., Rajagopal, R., Fischer, M.: Determinants of residential electricity consumption: using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants’ behavior. Energy 55, 184–194 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Z., Han, B., Lu, M.: Measurement of energy rebound effect in households: evidence from residential electricity consumption in Beijing, China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 852–861 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Energy Information Administration (US): Annual Energy Review 2011. Government Printing Office (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T.: A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25(3), 273–291 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., Sharif, A.: The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy 35(4), 1598–1608 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foster, B., Mazur-Stommen, S.: Results from Recent Real-Time Feedback Studies. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chetty, M., Tran, D., Grinter, R.E.: Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 242–251 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kantola, S.J., Syme, G.J., Campbell, N.A.: Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. J. Appl. Psychol. 69(3), 416 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCalley, L.T., Midden, C.J.: Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: the roles of goal-setting and social orientation. J. Econ. Psychol. 23(5), 589–603 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wood, G., Newborough, M.: Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviour and design. Energy Build. 35(8), 821–841 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Shenzhen Malong Artificial Intelligence Research CenterShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations