Unlock a Bike, Unlock New York: A Study of the New York Citi Bike System

  • Yinghao Chen
  • Zhiyuan Liu
  • Di HuangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 98)


As urban populations grow, there is a growing need for efficient and sustainable modes, such as bicycling. The shortage of bicycle demand data is a barrier to design, planning, and research efforts in bicycle transportation before. In July 2013, the New York City implements the bike-sharing system, Citi Bike, and makes their data available for analysis. Data used in this study includes the information about active stations, average bicycles available, total annual membership, maintenance issues, events of vandalism and calls and emails to system center. Through statistic description, partial correlation analysis and principle component analysis, final variables are obtained. Finally, a Poisson regression model was adopted for the analysis. The analysis results are useful for understanding the influential factors including temperatures and weathers, which reflected by seasons generally, and supplements associated with rules or policy of bike-sharing system. In addition, the inferential results of these models provide guidance on future planning of station and bike supplement.


  1. Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N.: Incorporating the impact of spatio-temporal interactions on bicycle sharing system demand: a case study of New York CitiBike system. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 218–227 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Robardet, C., Rouquier, J.-B., Fleury, E.: Shared bicy- cles in a city: a signal processing and data analysis perspective. Adv. Complex Syst. 14(03), 415–438 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fishman, E.: Bikeshare: a review of recent literature. Transp. Rev. 36, 92–113 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fuller, D., Gauvin, L., Kestens, Y., Daniel, M., Fournier, M., Morency, P., Drouin, L.: Use of a new public bicycle share program in Montreal. Canada. Am. J. Prev. Med. 41(1), 80–83 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N.: Analyzing bicycle sharing system user destination choice preferences: an investigation of Chicago’s Divvy system. J. Transp. Geogr. 44, 53–64 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A., Rabbat, M., Haq, U.: How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. J. Transp. Geogr. 41, 306–314 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giot, R., Cherrier, R.: Predicting bikeshare system usage up to one day ahead. In: IEEE Symposium Series in Computational Intelligence 2014. Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems, pp. 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. González, F., Melo-Riquelme, C., de Grange, L.: A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system. Transportation 43, 407–423 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han, Y., Côme, E., Oukhellou, L.: Towards bicycle demand prediction of large-scale bicycle sharing system. Presented at Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, No. 14–2637 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Jin, S., Qu, X., Zhou, D., Xu, C., Ma, D., Wang, D.: Estimating cycleway capacity and bicycle equivalent units for electric bicycles. Transp. Res. Part A 77, 225–248 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., Banchs, R.: Urban cycles and mobility patterns: exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 6(4), 455–466 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, Z., Yan, Y., Qu, X., Zhang, Y.: Bus stop-skipping scheme with random travel time. Transp. Res. Part C 35, 46–56 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meddin, R., DeMaio, P.: The Bike-Sharing World Map. Accessed 20 July 2015
  14. Meng, Q., Qu, X.: Estimation of vehicle crash frequencies in road tunnels. Accid. Anal. Prev. 48, 254–263 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Midgley, P.: The role of smart bike-sharing systems in urban mobility. Journeys 2, 23–31 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Murphy, E., Usher, J.: The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: analysis of the Irish ex-perience. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9, 116–125 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Brien, O., Cheshire, J., Batty, M.: Mining bicycle sharing data for generating in-sights into sustainable transport systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 34, 262–273 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qu, X., Zhang, J., Wang, S.: On the stochastic fundamental diagram for freeway traffic: model development, analytical properties, validation, and extensive applications. Transp. Res. Part B 104, 256–271 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Noland, R.B., Smart, M.J., Guo, Z.: Bikeshare trip generation in New York city. Transp. Res. Part A 94, 164–181 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. Rudloff, C., Lackner, B.: Modeling demand for bikesharing systems: neighboring sta-tions as source for demand and reason for structural breaks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2430, 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, School of TransportationSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations