Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Finance and Sustainability pp 255–264Cite as

Impact of EBITDA Variability on Empirical Safety Thresholds of Indebtedness and Liquidity Ratios: The Case of Poland

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 819 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

To stay sustainable firms must maintain safe levels of indebtedness and liquidity ratios. Suggested “rules of thumb” for both metrics may be found in corporate finance handbooks. Typically it is assumed that the indebtedness above 60–66% may be deemed hazardous, while it is recommended that current liquidity is kept above 1.20–1.50. However, these benchmarks do not take into account any impact of other risk factors, including variability of earnings. In this paper the empirical safety thresholds for indebtedness and liquidity ratios are estimated on the ground of the sample of 64 Polish public companies which filed for bankruptcy between the beginning of 2009 and the end of 2016. This sample of “bankrupt” businesses is compared to the counter-sample of randomly selected public firms which did not face any bankruptcy filing in the same period. Then the whole sample of 128 firms is divided into two sub-samples, on the ground of past 5-years variation in annual EBITDA. Consistent with expectations, the research found that businesses with relatively smooth income trends may afford much more debt than firms with above-average earnings variability. Likewise, the empirical safety threshold of liquidity ratio is much higher for firms with relatively erratic earnings (as compared to those with more stable profit streams). However, contrary to these findings, companies with relatively volatile EBITDA tend to have above-average indebtedness and below-average liquidity ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atrill P (2000) Financial management for non-specialists. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Badrinath SG, Gay GD, Kale JR (1989) Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial ‘safety-net’ hypothesis. J Risk Insur 56(4):605–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie V, Brown S, Ewers D, John B, Manson S, Thomas D, Turner M (1994) Extraordinary items and income smoothing: a positive accounting approach. J Bus Finance Account 21(6):791–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver WH, Kettler P, Scholes M (1970) The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures. Account Rev 45(4):654–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver WH, McNichols M, Rhie JW (2005) Have financial statements become less informative? Evidence from the ability of financial ratios to predict bankruptcy. Rev Acc Stud 10(1):93–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman R (1979) The theoretical relationship between systematic risk and financial (accounting) variables. J Financ 34(3):617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caouette JB, Altman EI, Narayanan P, Nimmo RWJ (2008) Managing credit risk. The great challenge for global financial markets. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson SJ, Bathala CT (1997) Ownership differences and firms’ income smoothing behavior. J Bus Finance Account 24(2):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous C, Charitou A, Kaourou F (2000) Comparative analysis of artificial neural network models: application in bankruptcy prediction. Ann Oper Res 99:403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chava S, Jarrow RA (2004) Bankruptcy prediction with industry effects. Rev Financ 8(4):537–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiroglu C, James C (2010) The information content of bank loan covenants. Rev Financ Stud 23(1):3700–3737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichev I, Tang VW (2009) Earnings volatility and earnings predictability. J Account Econ 47(1–2):160–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, O’Hara M (2004) Information and the cost of capital. J Financ 59(4):1553–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridson M, Alvarez F (2002) Financial statement analysis. A practitioner’s guide. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham B, Dodd D (1934) Security analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • He W, Sidhu BK, Tan HC (2010) Income smoothing and properties of analyst information environment. Paper presented at AAA Annual Meeting and CTLA, San Francisco, 2–4 August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang G, Lee CMC, Zhang Y (2005) Information uncertainty and expected returns. Rev Acc Stud 10(2–3):185–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung B, Soderstrom N, Yang S (2013) Earnings smoothing activities of firms to manage credit ratings. Contemp Account Res 30(2):645–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B, Kunitsky S (1974) On the association between smoothing measures and the risk of common stocks. Account Rev 49(2):259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N (2016) Performance measures in earnings-based financial covenants in debt contracts. J Account Res 54(4):1149–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Richie N (2009) Income smoothing and the cost of debt. Wilfrid Laurier University Working Papers

    Google Scholar 

  • Montier J (2009) Value investing. tools and techniques for intelligent investment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer RC, McGuigan JR, Kretlow WJ (1995) Contemporary financial management. West Publishing Company, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford CW, Comiskey EE (2002) The financial numbers game. Detecting creative accounting practices. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson JA (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Account Res 18(1):109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palepu KG, Healy PM, Bernard VL (2004) Business analysis & valuation using financial statements. Thomson South-Western, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt SP, Niculita AV (2008) Valuing a business. The analysis and appraisal of closely held companies. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Previts GJ, Bricker RJ, Robinson TR, Young SJ (1994) A content analysis of sell-side financial analyst company reports. Account Horiz 8(2):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg B, McKibben W (1973) The prediction of systematic and specific risk in common stocks. J Financ Quant Anal 8(2):317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saliers EA (1924) Accountant’s handbook. The Ronald Press Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway T (2001) Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. J Bus 74(1):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickney CP, Brown PR, Wahlen JM (2004) Financial reporting and statement analysis. A Strategic Perspective. Thomson South-Western, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasu Y, Nakano M (2012) What do smoothed earnings tell us about the future? Jpn Account Rev 2:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman B, Titman S (1988) An explanation for accounting income smoothing. J Account Res 26(Supplement):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verninmen P, Quiry P, Dallocchio M, Le Fur Y, Salvi A (2005) Corporate finance theory and practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Williams TH (1994) Accounting income smoothing and stockholder wealth. J Appl Bus Res 10(3):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GI, Sondhi AC, Fried D (2003) The analysis and use of financial statements. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmijewski ME (1984) Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. J Account Res 22(Supplement):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wroclaw University of Economics, Wroclaw, Poland

    Jacek Welc

Authors
  1. Jacek Welc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Welc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Corporate Finance and Public Finance, Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław, Poland

    Agnieszka Bem

  2. Corporate Finance and Public Finance, Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław, Poland

    Karolina Daszyńska-Żygadło

  3. Department of Management, University of Economics Prague, Jindřichův Hradec, Czech Republic

    Taťána Hajdíková

  4. Department of Investments and Corporate Finance, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

    Péter Juhász

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Welc, J. (2018). Impact of EBITDA Variability on Empirical Safety Thresholds of Indebtedness and Liquidity Ratios: The Case of Poland. In: Bem, A., Daszyńska-Żygadło, K., Hajdíková, T., Juhász, P. (eds) Finance and Sustainability. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92228-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation