Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Forest Management for Insect Conservation in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forests and Insect Conservation in Australia

Abstract

The widespread acknowledgements of need for forest preservation and reservation have generated numerous stated ‘targets’ for this to occur, with recognition that these targets are often ambitious and challenging, and that ‘our ability to recover biodiversity and ecosystem functions fully is currently limited’ (Jacobs et al. 2015). Progress is rendered more uncertain from increased climatic variability and the additional stresses this imposes on restoration outcomes based on current practices. Design of new resilient forest ecosystems that can adapt to such changes and changing conditions may incorporate additional species (with further incorporation of alien species sometimes controversial), and patterns such as creation of forest fragments in positions where ecosystem services and biodiversity connectivity may be best enhanced or facilitated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABARES (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences) (2017) Australia’s forests at a glance, with data to 2015–2016. Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeita GA, Robalino JA (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:16089–16094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • As S (1993) Are habitat islands islands? Woodliving beetles (Coleoptera) in deciduous forest fragments in boreal forest. Ecography 16:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlegrim O, Sjoberg K, Ball JP (1997) Forestry effects on a boreal beetle community in spring: selective logging and clear-cutting compared. Entomol Fennica 8:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker SC, Grove SJ, Forster L, Bonham KJ, Bashford D (2009) Short-term responses of ground-active beetles to alternative silvicultural systems in the Warra Silvicultural systems trial, Tasmania, Australia. For Ecol Manag 258:444–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Avila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB et al (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary and plantation forests. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104:18555–18560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Siedler R (1998) Natural forest management and conservation of biodiversity in tropical forests. Conserv Biol 12:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg A, Ehnstrom B, Gustafsson L, Hallingback T, Jonsell M, Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests; distribution and habitat associations. Conserv Biol 8:718–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernes C, Jonsson BG, Junninen K, Lohmus A, Macdonald E, Muller J, Sandstrom J (2015) What is the impact of active management on biodiversity in forest set aside for conservation or restoration? A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid 4:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0050-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C (2005a) Short-term effect of windstorm disturbance on saproxylic beetles in broadleaved temperate forests. Part I: Do environmental changes induce a gap effect? For Ecol Manage 216:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C (2005b) Short-term effect of windstorm disturbance on saproxylic beetles in broadleaved temperate forests. Part II: Effects of gap size and gap isolation. For Ecol Manage 216:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C, Duelli P (2004) The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol Conserv 118:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA (2012) Little left to lose: deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. J Plant Ecol 5:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer LL, Farley KA (2010) Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19:3893–3915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cale JA, Klutsch JG, Erbilgin N, Negron JF, Castello JD (2016) Using structural sustainability for forest health monitoring and triage: case study of a mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) - impacted landscape. Ecol. Indic 70:451–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR (2011) The seven impediments to invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144:2647–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carron LT (1985) A history of forestry in Australia. Australian National University Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1992) National Forest Policy Statement: a new focus for Australia’s forests. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1995) Regional forest agreements: the commonwealth position. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson RN, Stephen FM (2008) Impacts of insects in forest landscapes: implications for forest health management. In Paine TD, Lieutier F (eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Springer, Cham, pp. 101–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ, Morris DC, Mound LA (2004) Evolution of ecological and behavioural diversity: Australian Acacia thrips as model organisms. Australian Biological Resources Study and Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valck J, Vlaeminck P, Broekx S, Liekens I, Aertsens J, Chen W, Vranken L (2014) Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Landsc Urb Plann 125:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P, Obrist MK, Wermelinger B (2002) Windthrow-induced changes in faunistic biodiversity in alpine spruce forests. For Snow Landsc Res 77:117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelt A, Muller J, Bense U, Brustel H, Bussler H et al. (2017) “Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: a set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants. J Insect Conserv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0028-6

  • Evans MC (2016) Deforestation in Australia: drivers, trends and policy responses. Pac Conserv Biol 22:130–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feener DH, Schupp EW (1998) Effect of treefall gaps on the patchiness and species richness of Neotropical ant assemblages. Oecologia 116:191–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J (2002) Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodivers Conserv 11:521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb H, Hjalten J, Ball JP, Atlegrim O, Pettersson RB et al (2006) Effects of landscape composition and substrate availability on saproxylic beetles in boreal forests: a study using experimental logs for monitoring assemblages. Ecography 29:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotmark F (2013) Habitat management alternatives for conservation forests in the temperate zone: review, synthesis, and implications. For Ecol Manag 306:292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough LA, Birkemoe T, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2014) Reactive forest management can also be proactive for wood-living beetles in hollow oak trees. Biol Conserv 180:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimbacher PS, Catterall CP (2007) How much do site age, habitat structure and spatial isolation influence the restoration of rainforest beetle species assemblages? Biol Conserv 135:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Perhans K (2010) Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach. Ambio 39:546–554

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halme P, Allen KA, Aunins A, Bradshaw RHW, Beunelkis G et al (2013) Challenges of ecological restoration: lessons from forest in northern Europe. Biol Conserv 167:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Hill JK, Benedick S, Mustaffa N, Sgerratt TN, Maryatis M, Chey VK (2003) Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity. J Appl Ecol 40:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (2008) Insect conservation in boreal forests. J Insect Conserv 12:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S (1987) Treefall gaps versus forest understorey as environments for a defoliating moth on a tropical forest shrub. Oecologia 72:65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 155:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Hamer KC, Tangah J, Dawood M (2001) Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia 128:294–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber C, Baumgartner M (2005) Early effects of forest regeneration with selective and small scale clear-cutting on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a Norway spruce stand in southern Bavaria (Hoglwald). Biodivers Conserv 14:1989–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbe M, Milberg P, Tuner A, Bergman K-O (2011) History matters: impact of historical land use on butterfly diversity in clear-cuts in a boreal landscape. For Ecol Manag 261:1885–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, Bolte A, Bullock JM et al (2015) Restoring forests: what constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New Forests 46:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jactel H, Nicoll BC, Branco M, Gonzalez-Olabarria JR, Grodzki W et al (2009) The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage. Ann For Sci 66:701 18 pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes MR, Peace AJ, Ferris R (2001) Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure. For Ecol Manag 148:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick JB (1998) Nature conservation and the Regional Forest Agreement process. Austr J Environ Manage 5:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusel J (2001) Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities. J Sust For 13:359–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D (1998) Large-scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantations. Restor Ecol 6:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langor DW, Hammond HEJ, Spence JR, Jacobs J, Cobb TP (2008) Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation. Canad Entomol 140:453–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Ekbom B, Schroeder LM, McGeoch MA (2006) Saproxylic beetles in a Swedish boreal forest landscape managed according to ‘new forestry. In Grove SJ, Hanula JL (eds) Insect biodiversity and dead wood. Proceedings of a symposium for the 22nd international congress of entomology. USDA General and Technical Report SRS-93, Ashville, NC, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert LW, Bassler C, Brandl R, Burton PJ, Muller J (2013) Conservation value of forests attacked by bark beetles: highest number of indicator species is found in early successional stages. J Nat Conserv 21:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT (2001) Effect of experimental selective logging on tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 15:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 131:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Bennett AF, Hobbs R (2010) How far have we come? Perspectives on ecology, management and conservation of Australia’s temperate woodlands (Chapter 42). In Lindenmayer D, Bennett A, Hobbs R (eds) Temperate woodland conservation and management CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 14 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Blair D, McBurney L, Banks SC (2015) The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 21:266–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovei GL, Cartellieri M (2000) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in forest fragments of the Manawatu, New Zealand: collapsed assemblages? J Insect Conserv 4:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo-Delgado L, Lopez-Garcia J, Alcantara-Ayala I (2014) Role of forest conservation in lessening land degradation in a temperate region: the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. J Environ Manag 138:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller J, Noss RF, Bussler H, Brandl R (2010) Learning from a “benign neglect strategy” in a national park: response of saproxylic beetles to dead wood accumulation. Biol Conserv 143:2559–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura A, Proctor H, Catterall CP (2003) Using soil and litter arthropods to assess the state of rainforest restoration. Ecol Manage Restor 4:S20–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann FG (1992) Responses of foraging ant populations to high-intensity wildfire, salvage logging and natural regeneration processes in Eucalyptus regnans regrowth forest of the Victorian Central Highlands. Aust For 55:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear-cut harvest on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton TW (1996) Conserving biological diversity in Australia’s temperate eucalypt forests. For Ecol Manag 85:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton TW (1997) Conservation and management of eucalypt ecosystems. In Williams JA, Woinarski JCZ (eds) Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 373–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez-Mir GC, Iannone BV III, Curtis K, Fei S (2015) Evaluating the evolution of forest restoration research in a changing world: a “big literature” review. New For 46:669–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillet Y, Berges L, Hjalten J, Odor P, Avon C et al (2009) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardonnet S, Beck H, Milberg P, Bergman K-O (2013) Effect of tree-fall gaps on fruit-feeding nymphalid butterfly assemblages in a Peruvian rain forest. Biotropica 45:612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick M, Fowler D, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ (2012) Effects of treefall gap disturbances on ant assemblages in a tropical montane cloud forest. Biotropica 44:472–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putz FE, Dykstra DP, Heinrich R (2000) Why poor logging practices persist in the tropics. Conserv Biol 14:951–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes JR, Cattarino L, Seabrook L, Maron M (2017) Assessing the effectiveness of regulation to protect threatened forests. Biol Conserv 216:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA, Windsor DM (2007) Seasonal variation of arthropod abundance in gaps and the understorey of a lowland moist forest in Panama. J Trop Ecol 23:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routley R, Routley V (1975) The fight for the forests: the takeover of Australian forests for pines, wood chips and intensive forestry. Australian National University Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Martin-Quellen E, Hunter ML (2014) Forest landscape change and biodiversity conservation. In Azevedo JC, Perera AH, Pinto MA (eds) Forest landscapes and global change: challenges for research and management. Springer, New York, pp. 167–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Savilaakso S, Koivisto J, Veteli TO, Pusenius J, Roininen H (2009) Long lasting impact of forest harvesting on the diversity of herbivorous insects. Biodivers Conserv 18:3931–3948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelhaas M-J, Nabuurs G-J, Schuck A (2003) Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob Change Biol 9:1620–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegg K (2000) Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Ecoscience 7:290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter TD (1994) Invertebrate community structure and herbivory in a tropical rain forest canopy in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Hugo. Biotropica 26:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter TD, Ganio LM (1999) Invertebrate communities in a tropical rain forest canopy in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Hugo. Ecol Entomol 24:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder LM (2010) Colonization of storm gaps by the spruce bark beetle: influence of gap and landscape characteristics. Agric For Entomol 12:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelly TE (1982) Comparative foraging behavior of light-versus shade-seeking adult damselflies in a lowland Neotropical forest (Odonata: Zygoptera). Physiol Zool 55:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebold S, Brandl R, Buse J, Hothoen T, Schmidl J, Thorn S, Muller J (2015) Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forest in Europe. Conserv Biol 29:382–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagarino C, Pastur GM, Peri PL (2001) Changes in Nothofagus pumilio forest biodiversity during the forest management cycle. 1. Insects. Biodivers Conserv 10:2077–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA (2004) Ecological concepts and diversity of old-growth forests. J For 102:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Jaros J, Havelka J, Leps J (1997) Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv 80:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA (2015) Future landscapes: opportunities and challenges. New For 46:615–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SS, Wagner MR (2006) Using ground foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) functional groups as bioindicators of forest health in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests. Environ Entomol 35:937–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GH, Burrows LE (1994) Coarse woody debris in old-growth temperate beech (Nothofagus) forests of New Zealand. Can J For Res 24:1988–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD, Larsen TB (2003) Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon. Biodivers Conserv 12:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims RA (2002) The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol Conserv 106:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabor J, McElhinny C, Hickey J, Wood J (2007) Colonisation of clearfelled coupes by rainforest tree species from mature mixed forest edges, Tasmania, Australia. For Ecol Manag 240:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Makihara H, Matsumura T, Hasegawa M, Matsuura T et al (2013) Evaluation of secondary forests as alternative habitats to primary forest for flower-visiting insects. J Insect Conserv 17:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RW (1983) Descriptive taxonomy: past, present, and future. In Highley E, Taylor RW (eds) Australian systematic entomology; a bicentenary perspective. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 91–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RJ, Doran N (2001) Use of terrestrial invertebrates as indicators of the ecological sustainability of forest management under the Montreal process. J Insect Conserv 5:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teale SA, Castello JD (2011) Regulators and terminators: the importance of biotic factors to a healthy forest. In: Castello JD, Teale SA (eds) Forest health: an integrated perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn S, Hacker HH, Seibold S, Jehl H, Bassler C, Muller J (2015) Guild-specific responses of forest Lepidoptera highlight conservation-oriented forest management – implications from conifer-dominated forests. For Ecol Manag 337:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen T, Kotiaho JS (2007) Burning of logged sites to protect beetles in managed boreal forests. Conserv Biol 21:1562–1572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres JA (1992) Lepidoptera outbreaks in response to successional changes after the passage of Hurricane Hugo in Puerto Rico. J Trop Ecol 8:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangansbeke P, Blondeel H, Landuyt D, De Frenne P, Gorissen L, Verheyen K (2017) Spatially combining wood production and recreation with biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 26:3213–3239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt AD, Stork NE, Bolton B (2002) The diversity and abundance of ants in relation to forest disturbance and plantation establishment in southern Cameroon. J Appl Ecol 39:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wermelinger B, Duelli P, Obrist MK (2002) Dynamics of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in windthrow areas in alpine spruce forests. For Snow Landsc Res 77:133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig MR, Camilo GR (1991) The effect of Hurricane Hugo on six invertebrate species in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. Biotropica 23:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ (1999) The effects of selective logging on the distribution of moths in a Bornean rainforest. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 354:1783–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ, Lim DC, Compton SG, Sutton SL (1999) Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest. Conserv Biol 14:1055–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H, Foster R (1978) Zunacetha annulata (Lepidoptera: Dioptidae), an outbreak insect in a neotropical forest. Geo-Eco-Trop 2:443–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee SL (1999) Three faces of ecosystem management. Conserv Biol 13:713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen AL (1993) Some practical issues in the assessment of invertebrate biodiversity. In: Beattie AJ (ed) Rapid biodiversity assessment. Macquarie University, Sydney, pp 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermeno-Hernandez I, Pingarroni A, Martinez-Ramos M (2016) Agricultural land-use diversity and forest regeneration potential in human-modified tropical landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y, Sang W, Warren-Thomas E, Liu Y, Yu Z, Wang C, Axmacher JC (2015) Diversity patterns of ground beetles and understorey vegetation in mature, secondary, and plantation forest regions of temperate northern China. Ecol Evol 5:531–542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y, Sang W, Warren-Thomas E, Axmacher JC (2016) Geometrid moth assemblages reflect high conservation value of naturally regenerated secondary forest in temperate China. For Ecol Manag 374:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Tim R. New

Authors
  1. Tim R. New
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

New, T.R. (2018). Forest Management for Insect Conservation in Australia. In: Forests and Insect Conservation in Australia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92222-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation