Skip to main content

Transarterial Embolization Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Principles of Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth commonest cancer worldwide and the third commonest cause of cancer-related death. The most commonly used algorithm for the staging and treatment of patients with HCC is that of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC). Patients with BCLC stage B disease at the time of first treatment are considered to be; unresectable, untransplantable and unablatable. The treatment aim is to elicit an objective response (complete or partial) and in some cases downstage the tumour such that a curative option might be considered in the future, e.g., liver transplantation or ablation. TACE should not be given where there is complete portal vein occlusion due to the risk of significant liver ischaemia and subsequent liver decompensation and death. The overall fitness of the patient should be considered and in the main reserved for patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and performance status 0.The use of tools such as HAP and ART may help identify patients unlikely to benefit from TACE. The role of the best embolic agent or the use of drug-eluting beads remains controversial and should be determined by local availability and expertise and assessment of the patient. The best strategy for first treatment nonresponders, i.e., further TACE versus alternative therapy, has yet to be evaluated and should be studied in further trials. This chapter discusses the rationale for the use of TACE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56(4):908–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(6):1264–73 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Njei B, Rotman Y, Ditah I, Lim JK. Emerging trends in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality. Hepatology. 2015;61:191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyson J, Jaques B, Chattopadyhay D, Lochan R, Graham J, Das D, et al. Hepatocellular cancer: the impact of obesity, type 2 diabetes and a multidisciplinary team. J Hepatol. 2014;60(1):110–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A, Vilana R, Ayuso Mdel C, Sala M, et al. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology. 1999;29(1):62–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(12):1118–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Padhya KT, Marrero JA, Singal AG. Recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013;29(3):285–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(3):329–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cross TJ, Villaneuva A, Shetty S, Wilkes E, Reeves H, et al. A national survey of the provision of ultrasound surveillance for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016;7:82–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadalayil L, Benini R, Pallan L, O'Beirne J, Marelli L, et al. A simple prognostic scoring system for patients receiving transarterial embolisation for hepatocellular cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2565–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon B, Soulen MC, Baum RA, Haskal ZJ, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Cope C. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin-C, ethiodol, and polyvinyl alcohol: prospective evaluation of response and survival in a U.S. population. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(6):793–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35(5):1164–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marelli L, Stigliano R, Triantos C, Senzolo M, Cholongitas E, Davies N, Tibballs J, Meyer T, Patch DW, Burroughs AK. Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(1):6–25. Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37(2):429–42. Review

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, et al. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(1):41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Renzulli M, Cioni R, Bargellini I, et al. Randomised controlled trial of doxorubicin-eluting beads vs conventional chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(2):255–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(6):571–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kluger MD, Halazun KJ, Barroso RT, Fox AN, Olsen SK, et al. Bland embolization versus chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma before transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2014;20(5):536–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Massarweh NN, Davila JA, El-Serag HB, Duan Z, Temple S, et al. Transarterial bland versus chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: rethinking a gold standard. J Surg Res. 2016;200(2):552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown KT, Do RK, Gonen M, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, et al. Randomized trial of hepatic artery embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres compared with embolization with microspheres alone. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(17):2046–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;Issue 3:Art. No CD004787.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katsanos K, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S, Maroulis I, Petsas T, Karnabatidis D. Comparative effectiveness of different transarterial embolization therapies alone or in combination with local ablative or adjuvant systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blackburn H, West S. Management of postembolization syndrome following hepatic transarterial chemoembolization for primary or metastatic liver cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(5):E1–E18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(1):52–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasan S, Thai N, Uemura T, Kudithipudi V, Renz P, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with child Pugh-a cirrhosis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(12):256–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hucke F, Sieghart W, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C, et al. The ART-strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol. 2014;60(1):118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer T, Fox R, Ma YT, Ross PJ, James MW, Sturgess R, et al. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(8):565–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Cross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cross, T., Evans, J.C. (2019). Transarterial Embolization Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Principles of Management. In: Cross, T., Palmer, D. (eds) Liver Cancers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92216-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92216-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92215-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92216-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics