Skip to main content

The State in the Capitalist Periphery: From the Structuralist Vacuum to the Neo-Structuralist Deviations and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development in Latin America

Abstract

This chapter contains a discussion that is a product of the lack of a systematic treatment of the state by Latin American structuralism, and of the deformations to which the state was subsequently submitted to by neo-structuralism. At the same time, this discussion relates to a larger field of problems related to the limitations that World-Systems Theory, Structuralist Marxism, and the institutionalists have in order to reflect about the constitutive specificities of the peripheral statehood. Trying to overcome these limitations, this chapter analyzes the complexity of “external” (differentiated combination of geopolitics and geo-economics of the center with the periphery) and “internal” (specificities of the social civil societies and their conflicts) factors that act in the conformation of the structures and implicative forms of the peripheral states, offering a suggestive way to explain the differentiated development paths followed by Latin America and East Asia particularly since the second half of the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Naturally, the civil societies and the states of the periphery, both within Latin American and EA, have their own specificities. Notwithstanding the recognition of the existence of particular trajectories and characteristics that are specific to each country, the argument developed through this chapter operates on a plane of generality that admits the consideration of certain characteristics common to Latin America and to EA to study the economic and political processes that took place within each of the regions, first during the postwar period, and subsequently under the advent of global capitalism.

  2. 2.

    To see more about the concept of “geo-economics”, see Chap. 5.

  3. 3.

    “Relative autarky” is understood as the achieved space of self-determination/autonomy that emerges in the periphery, in spatial forms and temporary variably, that allows the development of strategies of endogenous accumulation, driven by/from the state, within the conditioning framework of the hierarchic and uneven structure that the center/semi-periphery/periphery system place under the latter.

  4. 4.

    In relation to the “disenchantment” of Furtado and Prebisch regarding the state planning it can be consulted, respectively, the works of Almeida and Elesbão (2011) and Ormaechea and Fernández (2017).

  5. 5.

    About the current limitations that face the Latin American state to direct an industrialization policy, as well as the current restrictions to promote an autonomous industrialization, see Chap. 7.

  6. 6.

    The direction of a development strategy is a complex process that also includes the analysis of the multi-scale dimension of the state. In this regard, see Chap. 4.

References

  • Abe, Shigeyuki. 2016. Global Value Chains in East Asia. MCTI Conference, East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akamatsu, Kaname. 1962. A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Developing Economies 1 (1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almandoz, Arturo. 2008. Despegues Sin Madurez. Urbanización, Industrialización Y Desarrollo En La Latinoamérica Del Siglo XX. EURE XXXIV (102): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, de, and José Elesbão. 2011. Encantos E Desencantos de Celso Furtado Com a Racionalidade Do Planejamento Estatal. Cadernos Do Desenvolvimento 6 (8): 717–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, Alice. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni. 1999. El Largo Siglo XX. Madrid: AKAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni, and Jessica Drangel. 1986. The Stratification of the World Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone. Review 10 (1): 9–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni, and Beverly Silver. 1999. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Polanyi’s ‘Double Movement’: The Belle Époques of British and U.S. Hegemony Compared. Politics & Society 31 (2): 325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Walden. 1999. Dark Victory: The United States and Global Poverty. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielschowsky, Ricardo. 2009. Sesenta Años de La CEPAL: Estructuralismo Y Neoestructuralismo. Revista de La CEPAL (97): 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis. 1982. The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism. Politics and Society 11 (1): 51–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1969. Dependencia Y Desarrollo En América Latina. Ensayo de Interpretación Sociológica. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Post Scriptum a ‘Dependencia Y Desarrollo En América Latina’. Desarrollo Económico 17 (66): 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 1992. Four Asian Tigers with a Dragon Head: A Comparative Analysis of the State, Economy, and Society in the Asian Pacific Rim. In States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim, ed. Richard P. Appelbaum and J.W. Henderson. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. 1953. Estudio Preliminar Sobre La Técnica de Programación Del Desarrollo Económico. Río de Janeiro: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1954. La Cooperación Internacional En La Política de Desarrollo Latinoamericano. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1955. Análisis Y Proyecciones Del Desarrollo Económico. México: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Transformacion Productiva Con Equidad. La Tarea Prioritaria Del Desarrollo de América Latina Y El Caribe En Los Años Noventa. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Cambio Estructural Para La Igualdad. Una Visión Integrada Del Desarrollo. San Salvador: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Pactos Para La Igualdad. Hacia Un Futuro Sostenible. Trigésimo. Lima: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, Chris, and E. Anderson. 2005. The Historical Evolution of World-Systems. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, Chris, and Hiroko Inoue. 2011. Immanuel Wallerstein. In The WileyBlackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists: Volume II, Contemporary Social Theorists, ed. G. Ritzer and J. Stepnisky. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibber, Vivek. 2002. Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmental State. American Journal of Sociology 107 (4): 951–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert. 1996. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In Approaches to World Order, ed. Robert Cox and Timothy Sinclair, 85–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, James, and Kang-Kook Lee. 2005. From East Asian ‘Miracle’ to Neo-Liberal ‘Mediocrity’: The Effects of Liberalization and Financial Opening on the Post-Crisis Korean Economy. Global Economic Review 34 (4): 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumings, Bruce. 1984. The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles and Political Consequences. International Organization 38 (1): 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyo, Frederic. 1989. Labor and Development Policy in East Asia. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 505 (1): 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, Peter, Philip Kelly, Kris Olds, and Henry Wai-Chung Yeung. 2001. Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards an Analytical Framework for the Global Economy. Global Networks 1 (2): 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doner, Richard, Bryan Ritchie, and Dan Slater. 2005. Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective. International Organization 59 (2): 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, Gerard, and Dominique Lévy. 2001. Periodizing Capitalism: Technology, Institutions and Relations of Production. In Phases of Capitalist Development, ed. R. Albritton, M. Itoh, R. Westra, and A. Zuege. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. 1981. International Production and Multinational Enterprise. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, Pepe. 2017. Xi’s Wild Geese Chase the Silk Road Gold. Asia Times, May 15. http://www.atimes.com/article/xis-wild-geese-chase-silk-road-gold/.

  • Esser, Klaus, Hillebrand Wolfgang, Dirk Messner, and Meyer-Stamer Jörg. 1996. Competitividad Sistémica: Nuevo Desafío Para Las Empresas Y La Política. Revista de La CEPAL (59).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, Fernando. 1990. Industrialización En América Latina: De La “caja Negra” al Casillero Vacío. Comparación de Patrones Contemporáneos de Industrialización, ed. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Víctor Ramiro. 2017. La Trilogía Del Erizo-Zorro. Redes Globales, Trayectorias Nacionales Y Dinámicas Regionales Desde La Periferia. Barcelona: Anthropos – Siglo XXI Editores – Ediciones UNL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Víctor Ramiro, and Lucas Cardozo. 2012. Nueva Estatidad Bajo La Re-Emergencia Regional. La Reelaboración Del Proyecto Neoliberal Y Sus Alternativas En La Periferia. Estudios Urbanos E Regionais 14 (2): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiori, José Luis. 1992. Economía Política Del Estado Desarrollista En Brasil. Revista de La CEPAL (47): 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Para Um Diagnóstico Da Modernização Brasileira. In Polarização Mundial E Crescimento, ed. José Luis Fiori and Carlos Medeiros. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. História, Estratégia E Desenvolvimento Para Uma Geopolítica Do Capitalismo. San Pablo: Editorial Boitempo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, Celso. 1958. Fundamentos Da Programação Econômica. Econômica Brasileira 4 (1 e 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. A Pré-Revolução Brasileira. Río de Janeiro: Fondo de Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Dialética Do Desenvolvimento. Río de Janeiro: Fondo de Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1965. Obstáculos Políticos Para El Desarrollo Económico Del Brasil. Desarrollo Económico 4 (16): 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 1995. Globalisation, Market Civilisation and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 24 (3): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, Jim. 1999. State Power Beyond The ‘territorial Trap’: The Internationalization of the State. Political Geography 18: 669–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, Ian. 2001. Globalization and Regional Welfare Regimes: The East Asia Case. Global Social Policy 1 (2): 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graciarena, Jorge. 1972. Poder Y Clases Sociales En El Desarrollo de América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, Roberto. 1997. El Leviatán Acorralado: Continuidad Y Cambio En El Papel Del Estado En América Latina. Documento 97/40. Serie Ensayos. Santiago de Chile: ILPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurrieri, Adolfo. 1987. Vigencia Del Estado Planificador En La Crisis Actual. Revista de La CEPAL (31): 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 1982. The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, Sebastian, and Lea Shih. 2013. The Rise of Industrial Policy in China, 1978–2012. ​Harvard-Yenching Institute Working Paper Series (31).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert. 1968. The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 2008. El Futuro Del Estado Capitalista. Madrid: Los libros de la catarata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industry Policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, Kwame Sundaram. 2003. Globalization, Liberalization and Equitable Development: Lessons from East Asia. Geneve: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jorge. 2000. The Dynamics of Technological Learning During the Import-Substitution Period and Recent Structural Changes in the Industrial Sector of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. In Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, ed. L. Kim and R. Nelson, 307–334. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Cristóbal. 2002. Reforma Agraria, Industrialización Y Desarrollo ¿Por Qué Asia Oriental Superó a América Latina? Debate Agrario (34): 45-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, Daniel. 2003. La CEPAL, Las Empresas Transnacionales Y La Búsqueda de Una Estrategia de Desarrollo Latinoamericana. Revista de La CEPAL (79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholi, Atul. 2004. State Directed-Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. States and Economic Development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 29 (2): 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Yu Tae. 1999. Neoliberalism and the Decline of the Developmental State. Journal of Contemporary Asia 29 (4): 441–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Regional Innovation Policy of South Korea, Compared with, and Learning from, the European Union. In European Union Center of Excellence and Center for East Asian Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Robert, Zhi Wang, and Shang-Jin Wei. 2012. Estimating Domestic Content in Exports When Processing Trade Is Pervasive. Journal of Development Economics 99 (1): 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Seung-Ook, Joel Wainwright, and Jim Glassman. 2017. Geopolitical Economy and the Production of Territory: The Case of US–China Geopolitical-Economic Competition in Asia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50: 416–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, José Ignacio. 2012. La Geopolítica de Nicolas Spykman. Universidad EAFIT 31 (97): 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mariño, Luis. 1981. Las Empresas Transnacionales Y La Actual Modalidad de Crecimiento Económico. Revista de La CEPAL (14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel. 2001. State in Society. Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Estados Débiles, Estados Fuertes. México: FCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg, William. 2008. Shifting Sources and Uses of Profits: Sustaining US Financialization with Global Value Chains. Economy and Society 37 (3): 420–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1982. El Estado Burocrático Autoritario. Triunfos, Derrotas Y Crisis. Buenos Aires: Editorial Belgrano.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Modernización Y Autoritarismo. Prometeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1984. In Contradictions of the Welfare State, ed. J. Keane. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormaechea, Emilia, and Víctor Ramiro Fernández. 2017. Consideraciones Sobre El Cambio de Percepción de Raúl Prebisch En El Entendimiento Del Rol Del Estado Para El Desarrollo Latinoamericano (1949–1963). Papeles Del Centro de Investigación (18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, G. 1988. The New Asian Capitalism: An Economic Portrait. In Search of an East Asian Development Model, ed. P. Berger and H.-H. Hsiao. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore. 2015. Fast Policy. Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Jamie, and Adam Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, Milcíades. 2014. (Pseudónimo: Testa, Víctor) 1. La Evolución Industrial Argentina. In Fichas de Investigación Económica Y Social Tomo I (Abril 1964). Vol. I, ed. Milcíades Peña. Argentina: Ediciones Biblioteca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Estado, Poder Y Socialismo. México: Siglo XXI Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, Raúl. 1952. Problemas Teóricos Y Prácticos Del Crecimiento Económico. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956. El Papel de La Industria En El Crecimiento Argentino. In Conferencia Del Doctor Raúl Prebisch, Pronunciada En La Sede Social de La Unión Industrial Argentina El 11 de Octubre de 1956. Buenos Aires: Unión Industrial Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. Exposición Del Dr. Raúl Prebisch, Representante Del Secretario General de Las Naciones Unidas Y Director Principal de La CEPAL. In Tercera Conferencia Económica Interamericana, ed. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Hacia Una Dinámica Del Desarrollo Latinoamericano. CEPAL – Décimo Período de Sesiones.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Transformación Y Desarrollo. La Gran Tarea de América Latina. In CEPAL. Decimocuarto Período de Sesiones. Santiago de Chile, 27 de Abril Al 8 de Mayo de 1971, ed. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Crítica Al Capitalismo Periférico. Revista de La CEPAL Primer sem.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Socio-Economic Structure and Crisis of Peripheral Capitalism. Revista de La CEPAL (Second Half).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. Hacia Una Teoría de La Transformación. Revista de La CEPAL (96).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, Aníbal. 1968. Dependencia, Cambio Social Y Urbanización En Latinoamérica. Revista Mexicana de Sociología XXX (3): 525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckert, Arne. 2006. Towards an Inclusive-Neoliberal Regime of Development: From the Washington to the Post-Washington Consensus. Labour, Capital, and Society 39: 34–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, Stephen K. 2005. World-Systems Analysis After Thirty Years: Should It Rest in Peace? International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46 (3): 179–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2010. Global Inter-City Networks and Commodity Chains: Any Intersections? Global Networks 10 (1): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfati, Claude. 2008. Financial Dimension of Transnational Corporations, Global Value Chain and Technological Innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics 2 (2): 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garret. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Neil. 1993. Homeless/Global: Scaling Places. In Mapping the Futures. Local Cultures, Global Change, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and T. Tiickner, 87–119. Nueva York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spykman, Nicolas. 1942. Estados Unidos Frente Al Mundo. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Richard. 2009. What Ever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate. The Pacific Review 22 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1967. Política Nacional de Desarrollo Y Dependencia Externa. Estudios Internacionales 1 (1): 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Desarrollo, Subdesarrollo, Dependencia, Marginación Y Desigualdades Espaciales; Hacia Un Enfoque Totalizante. EURE 1 (1): 13–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Capitalismo Transnacional Y Desintegración Nacional En América Latina. Estudios Internacionales 4 (16): 3–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, Osvaldo, and Gustavo Zuleta. 1990. Neoestructuralismo Versus Neoliberalismo En Los Años Noventa. Revista de La CEPAL (42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, Rosemary. 1998. Progreso, Pobreza Y Exclusión. Una Historia Económica de América Latina. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert. 2013. Protecting Power: Western States in Global Organizations. In Global Governance in Crisis: New Powers and the Restructuring of World Order, ed. David Held and Charles Roger. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York; London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. 2000. Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, Not ‘normalizing. The Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Gobernanza Global, Estrategias Nacionales: Cómo Los Estados Hacen Espacio Para Desenvolverse Bajo La OMC. Documentos Y Aportes En Administración Pública Y Gestión Estatal 4 (3): 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigell, Mikael. 2016. Conceptualizing Regional Powers’ Geo-Economic Strategies: Neo-Imperialism, Neo-Mercantilism, Hegemony, and Liberal Institutionalism. Asia Europe Journal 14: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. 1983. Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor Ramiro Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández, V.R., Ormaechea, E. (2019). The State in the Capitalist Periphery: From the Structuralist Vacuum to the Neo-Structuralist Deviations and Beyond. In: Fernández, V., Brondino, G. (eds) Development in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92183-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics