Abstract
This chapter will attempt to introduce the notion of “multi-scalarity” to enrich Latin American Structuralistm (LAS) analysis and, at the same time, show a series of limitations of neo-structuralism in order to explain the key spatial dimensions of the remake and reproduction of the center-periphery structures associated with the contradictory dynamics of capitalism. It intends to propose a more advanced and adherent approach to the reality of the twenty-first century, seeking to grasp the hierarchical, unequal, dynamic, and contradictory development of the capitalist system, its total geo-economic and geopolitical redefinition, and its particular social production of space. Therefore, we will try to demonstrate how the notion of “multi-scalarity” is necessary to enrich structuralist analysis and capture the scalar complexity of contemporary capitalism from the periphery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Arrighi, G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.
Bértola, L., and J. Ocampo. 2012. Learning from Latin America: Debt Crises, Debt Rescues and When and Why They Work. Institute for the Study of the Americas, School of Advances Study (University of London) y Development Bank of Latin America (CAF).
Bielschowsky, R. 1998. Fifty Years of ECLAC Thought: A Review. Reprint in: ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division, 2016, pp. 7–44.
Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boyer, Robert, and Yves Saillard. 2002. Régulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
Brandão, C. 2015a. Capitalismo(s) y Región(es) en el singular y en el plural: desafíos para renovar el pensamiento crítico y original latino-americano e intervenir vía planificación regional. CEPAL, Serie Seminarios y Conferencias. Santiago de Chile. Santiago, Cepal/Ilpes.
———. 2015b. Regional Dynamics of South Atlantic Brazilian Capitalism: Theoretical and Methodological Notes. Terceiro Milênio: Revista Crítica de Sociologia e Política. Campos Goyatacazes 4 (1, January/July): 13–30.
Braudel, F. 1979. Civilisation matérielle: economie et capitalisme XVe–XVIIIe Siècle. París: Armand Colin.
Brenner, N. 2001. The Limits to Scale?: Methodological Reflection on Scalar Structuration. Progress in Human Geography 25 (4): 591–614.
Cardoso, F.H. 1979. The Originality of the Copy: The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Idea of Development. In Toward a New Strategy for Development: A Rothko Chapel Colloquium, ed. D. Seers et al. New York: Pergamon Press.
Cardoso, F.H., and E. Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CEPAL. 2012. Cambio estructural para la igualdad: una visión integrada del desarrollo. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, agosto.
Coraggio, J.L. 1979. Possibilities and Difficulties of Radical Spatial Analysis, Comparative Urbanization Studies. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles.
Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Mattos, C. 1972. Algunas consideraciones sobre la movilidad espacial de recursos en los paises latinoamericanos. EURE – Revista De Estudios Urbano Regionales. Santiago Chile 2 (6): 31–42.
ECLAC. 2016. ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division.
Fajnzylber, F. 1983. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.
Fernández, V.R. 2017. La trilogía del erizo-zorro: redes globales, trayectorias nacionales y dinámicas regionales desde la periferia. Buenos Aires and Santa Fe: Editorial Anthropos and Ediciones de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
Filgueiras, Luiz. 2013. A natureza do atual padrão de desenvolvimento brasileiro e o processo de desindustrialização. In Novas interpretações desenvolvimentistas, ed. Inez S.B. Castro. Rio de Janeiro: E-Papers/Centro Celso Furtado.
Fiori, José Luís. 2014. História, estratégia e desenvolvimento: para uma geopolítica do capitalismo. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Furtado, C. 1964. Development and Underdevelopment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1967. Intra-Country Discontinuities: Towards a Theory of Spatial Structures. Social Science Information 6: 7–14.
Gore, C. 1996. Methodological Nationalism and the Misunderstanding of East Asian Industrialization. European Journal of Development Research 8 (1): 77–122.
Hall, P.A., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. 1982. Limits to Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
———. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. 1974. Le production d´espace. Paris: Anthropos.
Leyva, F. 2008. Latin American Neostructuralism. The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marston, S.A. 2000. The Social Construction of Scale. Progress in Human Geography 24 (2): 219–242.
Marston, S.A., et al. 2005. Human Geography Without Scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. New Series 30 (3): 416–432.
Medeiros, C.A. 2010. Instituições e desenvolvimento econômico: uma nota crítica ao nacionalismo metodológico, Economia e Sociedade, Campinas 19, n. 3 (40): 637–645.
Palma, G. 1978. Dependency: A Formal Theory of Underdevelopment or a Methodology for Analysis of Concrete Situations of Underdevelopment? World Development 6: 881–924.
Peck, J. 2017. Neoliberalism. In The Wiley-AAG International Encyclopedia of Geography, ed. D. Richardson et al., 1–12. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pendenza, Massimo. 2016. Intimations of Methodological Nationalism in Classical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory 19 (4): 468–484.
Pinto, A. 1970a. Nature and Implications of the ‘Structural Heterogeneity’ of Latin America. Reprint in: ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division, 2016.
———. 1970b. Styles of Development in Latin America. Reprint in: ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division, 2016, pp. 315–340.
Prebisch, R. 1948. The Economic Development of Latin America Economic Survey of Latin America 1948 (E/CN.12/89). Reprint in: ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division, 2016, pp. 45–84.
———. 1963. Towards a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America. Reprint in: ECLAC Thinking – Selected Texts (1948–1998). Chile Santiago: United Nations. Web Services Division, 2016, pp. 255–276.
Rodríguez, Octávio. 2009. O estruturalismo latino-americano. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Rofman, A.B. 1974. Dependencia, estructura de poder y formación regional en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.
Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, N. 1984. Uneven Development. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1992. Geography, Difference and the Politics of Scale. In Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, ed. J. Doherty, E. Graham, and M. Malek, 57–79. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither Global nor Local. ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of Scale. In Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, ed. K. Cox, 137–166. New York/London: Guilford Press/Longman.
———. 2004. Globalisation or ‘Glocalisation’?: Networks, Territories and Re-Scaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (1): 25–48.
Tavares, M.C. 1981. Problemas de industrialización avanzada en capitalism tardíos y periféricos. Economia de América Latina, n. 6. Mexico: CIDE.
Wallerstein, I. 1974a. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Nueva York y Londres: Academic Press.
———. 1974b. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.
———. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandão, C.A. (2019). The Multi-Scalar Articulation of Economic Development. In: Fernández, V., Brondino, G. (eds) Development in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92183-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92183-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92182-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92183-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)