Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 552 Accesses

Part of the book series: Atlantis Studies in Dynamical Systems ((ASDS,volume 7))

Abstract

This section serves as a general-purpose introduction to all other sections of this memoir. In particular, we’ll always assume familiarity with the content of this section in subsequent discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By precomposition with coordinate charts.

  2. 2.

    Since translations are particular cases of biholomorphisms.

  3. 3.

    We define \(\omega \) by locally pulling-back dz via the charts: this gives a globally defined Abelian differential because the changes of coordinates are translations and, hence, dz is invariant under changes of coordinates.

  4. 4.

    Alternatively, this fact can be derived from Poincaré-Hopf index theorem applied to the vector field given by the vertical direction at all points of \(L-\{p\}\).

  5. 5.

    A translation flow is obtained by moving (almost all) points of a translation surface in a fixed direction.

  6. 6.

    I.e., the angle of reflection equals the angle of incidence.

  7. 7.

    It is possible to prove that \(\mathcal {L}(\kappa )\) is non-empty whenever \(\sum \limits _{l=1}^{\sigma } k_l=2g-2\).

  8. 8.

    Here, we use the developing map to put a natural topology on \(\mathcal {TH}(\kappa )\). More concretely, given \(\omega \in \mathcal {L}(\kappa )\), \(p_0\in \text {div}(\omega )\), an universal cover \(p:\widetilde{M}\rightarrow M\) and \(P_1\in p^{-1}(p_0)\), we have a developing map \(D_{\omega }:(\widetilde{M}, P_0)\rightarrow (\mathbb {C}, 0)\) determining completely the translation structure \((M,\omega )\). The injective map \(\omega \mapsto D_{\omega }\) gives a copy of \(\mathcal {L}(\omega )\) inside the space \(C^0(\widetilde{M},\mathbb {C})\) of complex-valued continuous functions of \(\widetilde{M}\). In particular, the compact-open topology of \(C^0(\widetilde{M}, \mathbb {C})\) induces natural topologies on \(\mathcal {L}(\kappa )\) and \(\mathcal {TH}(\kappa )\).

  9. 9.

    Via the so-called Gauss-Manin connection.

  10. 10.

    In general, \(\mathcal {H}(\kappa )\) are not manifolds: for example, the moduli space \(\mathcal {H}(0)\) of flat torii is \(GL^+(2,\mathbb {R})/SL(2,\mathbb {Z})\).

  11. 11.

    A slight modification of the notion of Rauzy classes introduced by Rauzy [60] in his study of i.e.t.’s.

  12. 12.

    Rauzy classes are complicated objects: the cardinalities of the largest Rauzy classes associated to \(\mathcal {H}_2\), \(\mathcal {H}_3\), \(\mathcal {H}_4\) and \(\mathcal {H}_5\) are 15, 2177, 617401 and 300296573.

  13. 13.

    It is possible to prove that the value \(\Phi (M,\omega )\in \mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) independs of the choice.

  14. 14.

    The sets \(\mathcal {H}^{(a)}(\kappa )\) are “hyperboloids” inside \(\mathcal {H}(\kappa )\): indeed, this follows from the fact that \(A_{\kappa }(\omega ) = \frac{i}{2}(\sum \limits _{n=1}^g (A_n \overline{B_n} - \overline{A_n} B_n)\) where \(A_n=\int _{\alpha _n}\omega \) and \(B_n=\int _{\beta _n}\omega \) are the periods of \(\omega \) with respect to a canonical symplectic basis \(\{\alpha _n, \beta _n\}_{n=1}^g\) of \(H_1(M,\mathbb {R})\).

  15. 15.

    Coming from Poincaré recurrence theorem.

  16. 16.

    A similar definition can be performed over the action of \(SL(2,\mathbb {R})\) and, by a slight abuse of notation, we shall also call “Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle” the resulting object.

  17. 17.

    For example, we can take \(\Vert .\Vert \) to be the so-called Hodge norm, see [28].

  18. 18.

    This reflects the fact that the eigenvalues of a symplectic matrix comes in pairs of the form \(\theta \) and \(1/\theta \).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Matheus Silva Santos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matheus Silva Santos, C. (2018). Introduction. In: Dynamical Aspects of Teichmüller Theory. Atlantis Studies in Dynamical Systems, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92159-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics