Skip to main content

Covenantal Ethics for Health Care

Alternative to Principles-Based Ethics and Convergence with Normative Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 195 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 5))

Abstract

Biomedical ethics has been dominated by principles-based ethics (PBE). PBE focuses on the process of moral problem-solving by rational consensus but suffers from minimal ethical content and inattentiveness to relational aspects that constitute the core of medical care. Grounded in a Reformational philosophical view of the created order, the Normative Reflective Practitioner (NRP) model acknowledges constitutive (structural and aspectual) as well as regulative (directional) dimensions of medical practice. Medical practice is qualified by the ethical principle of care for relational activities in medicine, which are most meaningfully expressed within a biblical covenantal ethical framework (CEF). CEF helps to transform the disparity in knowledge and power between caregiver and patient toward a covenantal disposition of caring for the vulnerable and needy. This model acknowledges creationally ordered individuality structures of medical practice, provides dynamic and normative direction to changes in the expression of those structures, and maintains focus on patient needs in light of techno-formative advances.

Both the NRP model and the CEF help to reinterpret the principle of beneficence within medicine as the ethical core aspect of all medical encounters, providing overarching moral force for maintaining relational cohesion in patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    References to the Greek deities or the Judeo-Christian God are often omitted and references to perceived morally negative behaviors are retained in codal form.

  2. 2.

    Also known as the “Teachings of the Twelve Apostles”, the Didache (Greek for “teaching”) speaks of the fetus as the molded image of God.

  3. 3.

    These aspects include numerical, spatial, kinetic, physical, biotic, psychic, logical, historical, lingual, social, economic, aesthetic, juridical, ethical, and pistical (or faith) aspects.

  4. 4.

    Seerveld introduces the idea of a techno-formative control or a techno-formative aspect in his attempt to clarify Dooyeweerd ”s articulation of the normative opening process. For the former, what Dooyeweerd calls the historical or cultural modal aspect might be better captured as the techno-formative aspect or activity of community expression over time. I use the term here to connote human activity involving the opening of medical knowledge that leads to adjustments in human activity for the sake of improved human care and healing.

  5. 5.

    See also Mt. 9:13 and 22:37–40.

  6. 6.

    This article contains the early beginnings of ideas whose further development can be found in Rusthoven, J. (2014). Covenantal Biomedical Ethics for Contemporary Medicine: An Alternative to Principles-Based Ethics. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

References

  • Barth, K. 1958. Church Dogmatics, III/1. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L.. 1978. Distributive justice and morally relevant differences. In The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (6-1-6-20). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 1979. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H.K. 1966. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 274 (24): 1354–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. 1995. Common values. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B.A. 1990. Quality of scholarship in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, K. 2002. Covenant and the vulnerable other. Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (9): 1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, V. 2003. Finding biomedicines for infectious diseases. Genetic Engineering News, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L.S. 2005. Theological bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camenisch, P.F. 1974. Paul Ramsey’s task: Some methodological clarifications and questions. In Love and society: Essays in the ethics of Paul Ramsey, ed. J. Johnson and D. Smith, 67–89. Missoula: Scholars Press, University of Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, C.K. 1996. The patient-physician covenant: An affirmation of Asklepios. Annals of Internal Medicine 124 (6): 604–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J. 2011. Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian philosopher of state and civil society. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, K.D., and B. Gert. 1990. A critique of principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, S. 2006. The nurse-patient relationship in cancer care as a shared covenant: A concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science 29 (4): 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. 1997. The discourse of modernity: Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Habermas. In Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on “The philosophical Discourse of Modernity”, ed. M.P. d’Entreves and S. Benhabib, 59–96. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. The Journal of Philosophy 76 (5): 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H. 1965. In the twilight of western thought. Nutley: The Craig Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969a. A new critique of theoretical thought. Vol. Vol II. Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969b. A new critique of theoretical thought. Vol. Vol III. Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, L. 1967. Ancient medicine: Selected papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. 1978. Basic ethical principles in the conduct of biomedical behavioral research involving human subjects. In The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (8-1-8-45). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferngren, G.B. 2009. Medicine & health care in early Christianity. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W. 1973. Ethics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, G. 2006. Persons and their lives: Reformational philosophy on man, ethics, and beyond. Philosophia Reformata 71 (1): 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Christian philosophical anthropology. A reformation perspective. Philosophia Reformata 75 (2): 141–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.M. 1990. Method in bioethics: A troubled assessment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1985. Der Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, J., and H. Jochemsen. 2000. Professional autonomy and the normative structure of medical practice. Theoretical Medicine 21: 457–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen, J. 2006. Normative practices as an intermediate between theoretical ethics and morality. Philosophia Reformata 71 (1): 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.H.S. 1924. The doctor’s oath. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A.R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A.R., and S. Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T.C. 1996. The patient-physician relationship: Covenant or contract? Mayo Clinic Proceedings 71 (9): 917–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillback, P.A. 2001. The binding of God: Calvin’s role in the development of covenant theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louthan, S. 1996. On religion–a discussion with Richard Rorty, Alvin Plantinga, and Nicholas Wolterstorff. Christian Scholar’s Review 26: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1978. How to identify ethical principles. In The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (10-1-10-41). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W.F. 1975. Code, covenant, contract, or philanthropy. Hastings Center Report 5 (6): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. The physician’s covenant. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Testing the medical covenant: Active euthanasia and health care reform. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meilaender, G. 1993. On William F. May: Corrected vision for medical ethics. In Theological voices in medical ethics, ed. A. Verhey and S.E. Lammers, 106–126. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, E. 1999. Covenant, community, and the common good: An interpretation of Christian ethics. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouw, R.J. 1990. The God who commands. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisker, J. 2006. A covenantal model for the medical educator-student relationship: Lessons from the covenant model of the physician-patient relationship. Medical Education 40: 502–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. 2000. Deconstruction and the “unfinished project of modernity”. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, O. 1994. Resurrection and moral order: An outline of evangelical ethics. Grand Rapids: Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, R.D., N. Pang, E.D. Pellegrino, and M. Siegler. 1997. Use of the Hippocratic oath: A review of twentieth century practice and a content analysis of oaths administered in medical schools in the US and Canada in 1993. Journal of Clinical Ethics 8: 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D. 1994. The four principles and the doctor-patient relationship: The need for a better linkage. In Principles of health care ethics, ed. R. Gillon, 353–364. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D., and E.D. Thomasma. 1996. The Christian virtues in medical practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. 1983. Reason and belief in God. In Faith and rationality: Reason and belief in God, ed. A. Plantinga and N. Wolterstorff, 16–93. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. 1999. Natural and divine law: Reclaiming the tradition of Christian ethics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. 1952. Basic Christian ethics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Deeds and rules in Christian ethics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L.D. 2002. Doing good and doing well: Shareholder activism, responsible investment, and mainline Protestantism. In The quiet hand of God: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism, ed. R. Wuthnow and J.H. Evans. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.D. 1930. The right and the good. Oxford (reprinted Indianapolis, IN): Clarendon Press (reprinted Hackett, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. The foundations of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. 1991. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seerveld, C.G. 1985. Dooyeweerd’s legacy for aesthetics: Modal law theory. In The legacy of Herman Dooyeweerd: Reflections on critical philosophy in the Christian tradition, ed. C.T. McIntire. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, M.D. 2007. Philosophical ethics and the so-called ethical aspect. Philosophia Reformata 72 (1): 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, D.F.M. 2009. Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines. Grand Rapids: Paideia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troost, A. 1983. The Christian ethos. Bloemfontein: Patmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Toward a Reformational philosophical theory of action. Philosophia Reformata 58 (2): 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M. 1981. A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, N. 1983. Until justice and peace embrace. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. Rusthoven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rusthoven, J.J. (2018). Covenantal Ethics for Health Care. In: Buijs, G., Mosher, A. (eds) The Future of Creation Order. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92147-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics