Abstract
The journey of an adsorbate molecule from the bulk of the fluid phase to the active centre of the adsorbent particle is characterised by complex transport and capture mechanisms . These need to be described by accurate mathematical expressions for a proper design of a fluid–solid adsorption unit. In turn, this is a fundamental prerequisite to comply with strict emission limits of pollutants in fluid streams.
Consider a chemical process evolving in a system with homogeneous spatial distribution of reactants. Classical rate equations reported in literature include time-invariant kinetic constants and transport parameters. This is not appropriate for diffusion-limited heterogeneous processes. Actually, they take place into spaces where the reactants are constrained by phase boundaries or force fields such as it happens in porous solids. Rate coefficients can show temporal memories with a decrease in time that leads to the definition of fractal-like kinetic expressions. This scenario is likely to be applied when adsorption of a pollutant from fluid phase on a porous sorbent is considered.
In this article, we investigate and discuss adsorption from liquid phase. This with an original focus on interrelationships among pollutants and adsorbents characteristics, dynamic adsorption results and fractal-like modelling of a selection of experimental data present in literature.
Among all models taken into consideration, fractal pseudo-first-order was the most statistically accurate. The value of the hybrid fractional error function ranged between 3 × 10−4 and 1 × 10−2. It resulted in general one order of magnitude lower than what obtained for a canonical pseudo-first-order model, that appeared to overestimate the values of degree of surface coverage by 10–20% under definite case-studies. Correspondingly this model predicted a faster attainment of equilibrium conditions, up to three-times earlier than experimentally recorded.
The fractal model involves the presence of an instantaneous rate coefficient. It ranged between orders 10−3 and 1 min−1. Adsorbents showing different features have been analysed, for example with variations in particle size (order 100 μm), specific surface area (order 102 m2 g−1), total pore volume (order 10−1 cm3 g−1). For short adsorption times, the instantaneous rate coefficient was positively affected by (i) a decrease in particle size; (ii) an increase in specific surface area and total pore volume; (iii) an increase in specific mesopore volume; (iv) an increase in average pore size.
The heterogeneity parameter of the fractal model influences the time-decay rate of the former coefficient. This parameter ranged between 0.138 and 0.478, and it was higher when: (i) the pore space is more crowded by already-adsorbed molecules; (ii) a larger degree of surface chemical heterogeneity is determined; (iii) the mean micropore size is smaller; (iv) the specific volume of ultramicropores is larger; (v) the pore size distribution is more polydispersed. Higher values for this parameter means that the exploration of the intraparticle environment is more hindered for the adsorbate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andini S, Cioffi R, Montagnaro F, Pisciotta F, Santoro L (2006) Simultaneous adsorption of chlorophenol and heavy metal ions on organophilic bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 31:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2005.09.004
Andini S, Cioffi R, Colangelo F, Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2008) Adsorption of chlorophenol, chloroaniline and methylene blue on fuel oil fly ash. J Hazard Mater 157:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.025
Balsamo M, Montagnaro F (2015) Fractal-like Vermeulen kinetic equation for the description of diffusion-controlled adsorption dynamics. J Phys Chem C 119:8781–8785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01783
Balsamo M, Di Natale F, Erto A, Lancia A, Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2010) Arsenate removal from synthetic wastewaters by adsorption onto fly ash. Desalination 263:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.035
Balsamo M, Di Natale F, Erto A, Lancia A, Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2011) Cadmium adsorption by coal combustion ashes-based sorbents – relationship between sorbent properties and adsorption capacity. J Hazard Mater 187:371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.029
Balsamo M, Di Natale F, Erto A, Lancia A, Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2012) Steam- and carbon dioxide-gasification of coal combustion ash for liquid phase cadmium removal by adsorption. Chem Eng J 207–208:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.003
Berry H (2002) Monte Carlo simulations of enzyme reactions in two dimensions: fractal kinetics and spatial segregation. Biophys J 83:1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73953-2
Brouers F, Sotolongo-Costa O (2006) Generalized fractal kinetics in complex systems (application to biophysics and biotechnology). Physica A 368:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.062
Crini G, Badot PM (eds) (2010) Sorption processes and pollution: conventional and non-conventional sorbents for pollutant removal from wastewaters. Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, Besançon ISBN:978-2-84867-304-2
Do DD (1998) Adsorption analysis: equilibria and kinetics. Imperial College Press, London ISBN:978-1-86094-382-9
Dokoumetzidis A, Macheras P (2011) The changing face of the rate concept in biopharmaceutical sciences: from classical to fractal and finally to fractional. Pharm Res 28:1229–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0370-4
Figaro S, Avril JP, Brouers F, Ouensanga A, Gaspard S (2009) Adsorption studies of molasse’s wastewaters on activated carbon: modelling with a new fractal kinetic equation and evaluation of kinetic models. J Hazard Mater 161:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.006
Gaspard S, Altenor S, Passe-Coutrin N, Ouensanga A, Brouers F (2006) Parameters from a new kinetic equation to evaluate activated carbons efficiency for water treatment. Water Res 40:3467–3477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.018
Harifar M, Azizian S (2012) Fractal-like adsorption kinetics at the solid/solution interface. J Phys Chem C 116:13111–13119. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp301261h
Harifar M, Azizian S (2014) Fractal-like kinetics for adsorption on heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Phys Chem C 118:1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4110882
Ho YS, McKay G (1998) Sorption of dye from aqueous solution by peat. Chem Eng J 70:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-1
Kim TH, Jang M, Park JK (2008) Bifunctionalized mesoporous molecular sieve for perchlorate removal. Micropor Mesopor Mat 108:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.023
Kopelman R (1986) Rate processes on fractals: theory, simulations, and experiments. J Stat Phys 42:185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01010846
Kopelman R (1988) Fractal reaction kinetics. Science 241:1620–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4873.1620
Lagergren S (1898) Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakad Handl 24:1–39
Li G, Zhao Z, Liu J, Jiang G (2011) Effective heavy metal removal from aqueous systems by thiol functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica. J Hazard Mater 192:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.015
Marczewski AW (2010) Analysis of kinetic Langmuir model. Part I: Integrated kinetic Langmuir equation (IKL): a new complete analytical solution of the Langmuir rate equation. Langmuir 26:15229–15238. https://doi.org/10.1021/la1010049
Mestre AS, Pires J, Nogueira JMF, Parra JB, Carvalho AP, Ania CO (2009) Waste-derived activated carbons for removal of ibuprofen from solution: role of surface chemistry and pore structure. Bioresour Technol 100:1720–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.039
Mohan D, Gupta VK, Srivastava SK, Chander S (2001) Kinetics of mercury adsorption from wastewater using activated carbon derived from fertilizer waste. Colloid Surf A 177:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00669-5
Montagnaro F, Balsamo M (2014) Deeper insights into fractal concepts applied to liquid-phase adsorption dynamics. Fuel Process Technol 128:412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.021
Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2009) Reuse of coal combustion ashes as dyes and heavy metal adsorbents: effect of sieving and demineralization on waste properties and adsorption capacity. Chem Eng J 150:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.12.022
Montagnaro F, Santoro L (2010) Chapter 11: Non-conventional adsorbents for the removal of metal compounds from wastewaters. In: Crini G, Badot PM (eds) Sorption processes and pollution: conventional and non-conventional sorbents for pollutant removal from wastewaters. Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, Besançon, pp 297–312 ISBN:978-2-84867-304-2
Montagnaro F, Balsamo M, Salatino P (2016) A single particle model of lime sulphation with a fractal formulation of product layer diffusion. Chem Eng Sci 156:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.09.021
Ncibi MC (2008) Applicability of some statistical tools to predict optimum adsorption isotherm after linear and non-linear regression analysis. J Hazard Mater 153:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.038
Pippa N, Dokoumetzidis A, Demetzos C, Macheras P (2013) On the ubiquitous presence of fractals and fractal concepts in pharmaceutical sciences: a review. Int J Pharm 456:340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.087
Plazinski W, Rudzinski W, Plazinska A (2009) Theoretical models of sorption kinetics including a surface reaction mechanism: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 152:2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.009
Qiu H, Lv L, Pan BC, Zhang QJ, Zhang WM, Zhang QM (2009) Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0820524
Rudzinski W, Plazinski W (2006) Kinetics of solute adsorption at solid/solution interfaces: a theoretical development of the empirical pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic rate equations, based on applying the statistical rate theory of interfacial transport. J Phys Chem B 110:16514–16525. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061779n
Ruthven DM (1984) Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. Wiley, New York ISBN:978-0-471-86606-0
Savageau MA (1995) Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: implications of fractal kinetics. J Theor Biol 176:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1995.0181
Sen PN (2004) Time-dependent diffusion coefficient as a probe of geometry. Concept Magn Reson Part A 23A:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20017
Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr A32:751–767. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551
Suzuki M (1990) Adsorption engineering. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam ISBN:978-0444988027
Vermeulen T (1953) Theory for irreversible and constant pattern solid diffusion. Ind Eng Chem 45:1664–1670. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50524a025
Wang ZW, Xu F, Manchala KR, Sun Y, Li Y (2016) Fractal-like kinetics of the solid-state anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag 53:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.019
Xu F, Ding H (2007) A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis: contributions from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects. Appl Catal A-Gen 317:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.10.014
Zhou J, Yang S, Yu J, Shu Z (2011) Novel hollow microspheres of hierarchical zinc–aluminium layered double hydroxides and their enhanced adsorption capacity for phosphate in water. J Hazard Mater 192:1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balsamo, M., Montagnaro, F. (2018). Fractal-Like Kinetic Models for Fluid–Solid Adsorption. In: Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92111-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92111-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92110-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92111-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)