Skip to main content

What Information Should a Dialogue System Understand?: Collection and Analysis of Perceived Information in Chat-Oriented Dialogue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Social Interaction with Agents

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 510))

Abstract

It is important for chat-oriented dialogue systems to be able to understand the various information from user utterances. However, no study has yet clarified the types of information that should be understood by such systems. With this purpose in mind, we collected and clustered information that humans perceive from each utterance (perceived information) in chat-oriented dialogue. We then clarified, i.e., categorized, the types of perceived information. The types were evaluated on the basis of inter-annotator agreement, which showed substantial agreement and demonstrated the validity of our categorization. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to clarify the types of information that a chat-oriented dialogue system should understand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dialogue-games: metacommunication structures for natural language interaction. Cogn Sci 1(4), 395–420 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen J (1983) Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Higashinaka R, Imamura K, Meguro T, Miyazaki C, Kobayashi N, Sugiyama H, Hirano T, Makino T, Matsuo Y (2014) Towards an open domain conversational system fully based on natural language processing. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp 928–939

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi A, Sharma V, Battacharyya P (2015) Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In: Proceedings of ACL/IJCNLP, pp 757–762

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Y, Bang J, Choi J, Ryu S, Koo S, Lee GG (2014) User information extraction for personalized dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of workshop on multimodal analyses enabling artificial agents in human-machine interaction

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ma C, Prendinger H, Ishizuka M (2005) Emotion estimation and reasoning based on affective textual interaction. In: Proceedings of affective computing and intelligent interaction

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meguro T, Minami Y, Higashinaka R, Dohsaka K (2014) Learning to control listening-oriented dialogue using partially observable markov decision processe. ACM Trans Speech Lang Process 10(15):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riloff E, Quadir A, Surve P, Silva LD, Gilbert N, Huang R (2013) Sarcasm as contrast between positive sentiment and negative situation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp 704–714

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takabatake Y, Morita H, Kawahara D, Kurohashi S, Higashinaka R, Matsuo Y (2015) Classification and acquisition of contradictory event pairs using crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on EVENTS: definition, detection, coreference, and representation, pp 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams JD, Raux A, Ramachandran D, Black, A (2013) The dialog state tracking challenge. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL, pp 404–413

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wong W, Cavedon L, Thangarajah J, Padgham L (2012) Flexible conversation management using a BDI agent approach. In: Proceedings of IVA, pp 464–470

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang C, Chai JY (2009) What do we know about conversation participants: experiments on conversation entailment. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL, pp 206–215

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang C, Chai JY (2010) Towards conversation entailment: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp 756–766

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang M, Qin B, Liu T, Zheng M (2014) Triple based background knowledge ranking for document enrichment. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp 917–927

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang M, Qin B, Zheng M, Hirst G, Liu T (2015) Encoding distributional semantics into triple-based knowledge ranking for document enrichment. In: Proceedings of ACL/IJCNLP, pp 524–533

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koh Mitsuda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mitsuda, K., Higashinaka, R., Matsuo, Y. (2019). What Information Should a Dialogue System Understand?: Collection and Analysis of Perceived Information in Chat-Oriented Dialogue. In: Eskenazi, M., Devillers, L., Mariani, J. (eds) Advanced Social Interaction with Agents . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 510. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92107-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92108-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics