Skip to main content

Actors, Roles and Interactions in Agricultural Innovation Networks: The Case of the Portuguese Cluster of Small Fruits

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover New Metropolitan Perspectives (ISHT 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 101))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The idea underpinning EIP-AGRI for linking producers and users of knowledge and promoting their interaction around problem-solving is well grounded on the evidence provided by the ‘innovation systems’ and related literature. Evidence gaps that matter to the implementation of the EIP-AGRI activities comprise the lack of knowledge regarding the best-fit network configuration for different farming systems and farming styles, and the nature and effectiveness of a facilitator function and role to bridge communication between researchers and farmers. This paper contributes with empirical evidence regarding the networks configuration best-fit for different farming system and farming styles, and provide insights on the facilitator relevance and its desirable profile, built on the study of a particular network: the Portuguese Cluster of small fruits (CSF). The small fruit sector is a novel sector in Portugal that has attracted in recent years a large number of new investors, in particular newly-established small-scale inexperienced producers. The insights provided by the CSF analysis emphasises that agglomeration economies based networks, which are very important in some agricultural sectors (e.g. fruit, wine) and in countries or regions where small-scale farms are significant, can in fact be the ground for knowledge and innovation networks in the sense wanted by the EIP-AGRI, since inclusiveness and facilitation functions are accounted for properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PRO-AKIS (Prospects for Farmers’ Support: Advisory Services in European AKIS. Additional information available at http://www.proakis.eu/).

  2. 2.

    To fully understand the social network analysis reported we suggest readers to see [17].

References

  1. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), State of the Innovation Union 2012 - Accelerating change. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, COM (2013), 149 final (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. EU SCAR, Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems towards 2020 - an orientation paper on linking innovation and research, Brussels (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asheim, B.: Interactive learning and localised knowledge in globalising learning economies. Geo J. 49, 345–352 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audretsch, D.: Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 14, 18–29 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke, P., Uranga, M., Etxebarria, G.: Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimension. J. Res. Pol. 26, 475–491 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lundvall, B.: National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, A.: Challenges to strengthening agricultural innovation systems: where do we go from here? In: Scoones, I., Thompson, J. (eds.) Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C.: Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy 33, 260–276 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., Neely, A.: Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 5–6(3–4), 137–168 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter, T., Gemuenden, H.: Interorganizational relationships and networks: an overview. J. Bus. Res. 56, 691–697 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oreszczyn, S., Lane, A., Carr, S.: The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations. J. Rural Stud. 26, 404–417 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wood, B.A., Blair, H.T., Gray, D.I., Kemp, P.D., Kenyon, P.R., Morris, S.T., Sewell, A.M.: Agricultural science in the wild: a social network analysis of farmer knowledge. PLoS ONE 9(8), e105203 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conroy, C.: The nature of agricultural innovation. In: Snapp, S., Pound, B. (eds.) Agricultural Systems: Agroecology and Rural Innovation for Development. Academic Press, San Diego (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., Leeuwis, C.: Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agr. Sys. 103, 390–400 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, M.E.: Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ. Dev. Q. 14, 15–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giuliani, E., Bell, M.: The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Res. Policy 34, 47–68 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanneman, R.A., Riddle, M.: Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Madureira, L., Ferreira, D., Pires, M.: Designing, implementing and maintaining (rural) innovation networks to enhance farmers’ ability to innovate in cooperation with other rural actors. The berry networks in Portugal. Report for AKIS on the ground: focusing knowledge flow systems (WP4) of the PRO AKIS project, December 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nooteboom, B.: Institutions and forms of coordination in innovation systems. Org. Stud. 21, 915–939 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knierim, A., Boenning, K., Caggiano, M., Cristóvão, A., Dirimanova, V., Koehnen, T., Labarthe, P., Prager, K.: The AKIS concept and its relevance in selected EU member states. Outlook Agr. 44, 29–36 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from the European Commission, 7th Framework Programme through the project PRO AKIS (Prospects for Farmers’ Support: Advisory Services in European AKIS, http://www.proakis.eu/). This work does not necessarily reflect the view of the European Union and in no way anticipates the Commission’s future policy in this area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lívia Madureira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Madureira, L., Cristóvão, A., Ferreira, D., Koehnen, T. (2019). Actors, Roles and Interactions in Agricultural Innovation Networks: The Case of the Portuguese Cluster of Small Fruits. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 101. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics