Skip to main content

Online Detection of Shill Bidding Fraud Based on Machine Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10868))

Abstract

E-auctions have attracted serious fraud, such as Shill Bidding (SB), due to the large amount of money involved and anonymity of users. SB is difficult to detect given its similarity to normal bidding behavior. To this end, we develop an efficient SVM-based fraud classifier that enables auction companies to distinguish between legitimate and shill bidders. We introduce a robust approach to build offline the optimal SB classifier. To produce SB training data, we combine the hierarchical clustering and our own labelling strategy, and then utilize a hybrid data sampling method to solve the issue of highly imbalanced SB datasets. To avert financial loss in new auctions, the SB classifier is to be launched at the end of the bidding period and before auction finalization. Based on commercial auction data, we conduct experiments for offline and online SB detection. The classification results exhibit good detection accuracy and misclassification rate of shill bidders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.trademe.co.nz/trust-safety/2012/9/29/shill-bidding.

  2. 2.

    https://nypost.com/2014/12/25/lawsuit-targets-googles-auction-com.

References

  1. Abedinzadeh, S., Sadaoui, S.: A rough sets-based agent trust management framework. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 5(4), 1–9 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akbani, R., Kwek, S., Japkowicz, N.: Applying support vector machines to imbalanced datasets. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, pp. 39–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30115-8_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chawla, N.V., et al.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chawla, N.V.: C4.5 and imbalanced data sets: investigating the effect of sampling method, probabilistic estimate, and decision tree structure. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, F., Shatz, S., Xu, H.: Combating online in-auction frauds: clues, techniques and challenges. Comput. Sci. Rev. 3(4), 245–258 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, F., Shatz, S.M., Xu, H., Majumdar, D.: Price comparison: a reliable approach to identifying SB in online auctions? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 11(2), 171–179 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ford, B.J., Haiping, X., Valova, I.: A real-time self-adaptive classifier for identifying suspicious bidders in online auctions. Comput. J. 56(5), 646–663 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganguly, S., Sadaoui, S.: Classification of imbalanced auction fraud data. In: Mouhoub, M., Langlais, P. (eds.) AI 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10233, pp. 84–89. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57351-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, P., Mundra, A.: Online in-auction fraud detection using online hybrid model. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication & Automation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, H., Garcia, E.A.: Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21(9), 1263–1284 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez, J., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F.: An empirical study of oversampling and undersampling for instance selection methods on imbalance datasets. In: Ruiz-Shulcloper, J., Sanniti di Baja, G. (eds.) CIARP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8258, pp. 262–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41822-8_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Köknar-Tezel, S., Latecki, L.J.: Improving SVM classification on imbalanced data sets in distance spaces. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 259–269 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nikitkov, A., Bay, D.: Online auction fraud: ethical perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 79(3), 235–244 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikitkov, A., Bay, D.: SB: empirical evidence of its effectiveness and likelihood of detection in online auction systems. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 16, 42–54 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ochaeta, K.: Fraud Detection for Internet Auctions. “A Data Mining Approach”, Master’s Thesis, College of Technology Management, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Phua, C., et al.: A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.6119 (2010)

  17. Resnick, P., et al.: Reputation systems. Commun. ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sabau, A.S.: Survey of clustering based financial fraud detection research. Informatica Economica 16(1), 110 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadaoui, S., Wang, X.: A dynamic stage-based fraud monitoring framework of multiple live auctions. Appl. Intell. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0818-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sallehuddin, R., Ibrahim, S., Elmi, A.H.: Classification of SIM box fraud detection using support vector machine and artificial neural network. Int. J. Innov. Comput. 4(2), 19–27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seiffert, C., et al.: An empirical study of the classification performance of learners on imbalanced and noisy software quality data. Inf. Sci. 259, 571–595 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trevathan, J., Read, W.: Detecting SB in online English auctions. In: Handbook of Research on Social and Organizational Liabilities in Information Security, p. 446 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Trevathan, J.: Getting into the mind of an “in-auction” fraud perpetrator. Comput. Sci. Rev. 27, 1–15 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss, G.M., McCarthy, K., Zabar, B.: Cost-sensitive learning vs. sampling: which is best for handling unbalanced classes with unequal error costs? In: International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 35–41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshida, T., Ohwada, H.: Shill bidder detection for online auctions. In: Zhang, B.-T., Orgun, M.A. (eds.) PRICAI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6230, pp. 351–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15246-7_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, S., Sadaoui, S., Mouhoub, M.: An empirical analysis of imbalanced data classification. Comput. Inf. Sci. 8(1), 151 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Sadaoui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ganguly, S., Sadaoui, S. (2018). Online Detection of Shill Bidding Fraud Based on Machine Learning Techniques. In: Mouhoub, M., Sadaoui, S., Ait Mohamed, O., Ali, M. (eds) Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10868. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92057-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92058-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics