Advertisement

Modelling the Validation Process of Enterprise Software Systems

  • Robert Bucki
  • Petr SuchánekEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 96)

Abstract

The paper highlights the problem of the criteria-based assessment of the software system taking into account their sustainability, maintainability, and usability. The extended iteration model of creating software as well as its subsequent implementation is emphasised. The mathematical model for validating the software by highly qualified experts is introduced. It is followed by presenting the general pseudocode on the basis of which it is possible to program the software responsible for choosing the appropriate experts who are able to validate the software types.

Keywords

Software development Software quality Criteria-based assessment Software expert Software validation Validation process Mathematical model Extended iterative model Model for validating 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by the project SGS at the Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karvina.

References

  1. 1.
    Sathiyanarayanan, M., Alsaffar, M.: Small multiples Euler-time diagrams for software engineering. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 13(4), 299–307 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-017-0298-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gravino, C., Host, M.: Guest editorial of special section on software engineering and advanced applications in information technology for software-intensive systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 93, 246–247 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baginski, J., Bialas, A.: Validation of the software supporting information security and business continuity management processes. Complex Syst. Dependability 170, 1–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buller, K.: A pragmatic method for assessing systems architectures during the architecture generation process with a focus on repurposing business software to systems engineering. Complex Adapt. Syst. 61, 153–159 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menard, P.A., Ratte, S.: Concept extraction from business documents for software engineering projects. Autom. Softw. Eng. 23(4), 649–686 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-015-0184-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Modrak, V., Bodnar, S., Soltysova, Z.: Application of axiomatic design-based complexity measure in mass customization. In: 26th Cirp Design Conference, pp. 607–612 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma, B., Nag, R., Makkad, M.: Process performance models in software engineering: a mathematical solution approach to problem using industry data. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 97(4), 5367–5384 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4783-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison, R., Bener, A.B., Mericli, C., Turhan, B.: Guest editorial: special issue on realising artificial intelligence synergies in software engineering. Autom. Softw. Eng. 24(4), 789–790 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-017-0224-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhrmann, M., Fernandez, D.M., Daneva, M.: On the pragmatic design of literature studies in software engineering: an experience-based guideline. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22(6), 2852–2891 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9492-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gren, L., Goldman, A.: Useful statistical methods for human factors research in software engineering: a discussion on validation with quantitative data. In: 9th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, pp. 121–124 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897588
  11. 11.
    Aversano, L., Grasso, C., Tortorella, M.: Validation of a measurement framework of business process and software system alignment. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Information Systems Analysis and Specification, vol. 3, pp. 470–474 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerry, E.: Software engineering practices to improve code quality and prepare for validation. In: Proceedings of the 5th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices Conference and Exposition, pp. 85–86 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zawistowski, P.: The method of measurement system software automatic validation using business rules management system. In: Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2205929
  14. 14.
    Ali, N., Lai, R.: A method of software requirements specification and validation for global software development. Requir. Eng. 22(2), 191–214 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-015-0240-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO/IEC 25010:2011.: International Organization for Standardization, 20 December 2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html
  16. 16.
    Ghahrai, A.: Iterative Model, 18 December 2017. https://www.testingexcellence.com/iterative-model/
  17. 17.
    Powell-Morse, A.: Iterative Model: What Is It and When Should You Use It? 18 December 2017. https://airbrake.io/blog/sdlc/iterative-model
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Management and Information TechnologyBielsko-BialaPoland
  2. 2.School of Business Administration in KarvináSilesian University in OpavaKarvináCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations