Abstract
Modern cities are increasing in geographical size, population and number. While this development ascribes cities an important function, it also entails various challenges. Efficient urban mobility, energy saving, waste reduction and increased citizen participation in public life are some of the pressing challenges recognized by the United Nations. Retaining livable cities necessitates a change in behaviour in the citizens, promoting sustainability and seeking an increase in the quality of life. Technology possesses the capabilities of mediating behaviour change. A review of existing works highlighted a rather unilateral utilization of technology, mostly consisting of mobile devices, employment of persuasive strategies for guiding behaviour change, and late end-user involvement in the design of the application, primarily for testing purposes. These findings leave the door open to unexplored research approaches, including opportunities stemming from the Internet of Things, reflective learning as behaviour change strategy, and active involvement of end-users in the design and development process. We present Tiles-Reflection, an extension of the Tiles toolkit, a card-based ideation toolkit for the Internet of Things. The extension comprises components for reflective learning, allowing thus non-expert end-users to co-create behaviour change applications. The results of the evaluation suggest that the tool was perceived as useful by participants, fostering reflection on different aspects connected to societal challenges in the smart city. Furthermore, application ideas developed by the users successfully implemented the reflective learning model adopted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M.: Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015)
Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., Tang, T.: Design for sustainable behaviour: using products to change consumer behaviour. Des. J. 14(4), 427–445 (2011)
Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D.: Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge (2013)
Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P.: Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 947–956. ACM (2012)
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T.A., Scholl, H.J.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 2289–2297. IEEE (2012)
DESA: The World’s Cities in 2016. UN, p. 27 (2016)
Driscoll, J., Teh, B.: The potential of reflective practice to develop individual orthopaedic nurse practitioners and their practice. J. Orthop. Nurs. 5(2), 95–103 (2001)
Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: Technology-enhanced smart city learning: a systematic mapping of the literature. IxD&A 27, 28–43 (2016)
Gianni, F., Mora, S., Divitini, M.: IoT for smart city learning: towards requirements for an authoring tool. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Smart Ecosystems Creation by Visual Design Co-Located with the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2016), CEUR-WS, Bari, Italy, vol. 1602, pp. 12–18, June 2016
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T.: Smarter as the new urban agenda: a comprehensive view of the 21st century city. In: Smarter as the New Urban Agenda: A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City, vol. 11, pp. 1–17. Springer (2015)
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T.: What makes a city smart? identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Inf. Polity 20(1), 61–87 (2015)
Habitat, U.: Urbanization and Development Emerging Futures. World Cities Report (2016)
Hallnäs, L., Redström, J.: Slow technology-designing for reflection. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 5(3), 201–212 (2001)
Hemment, D., Townsend, A.: Smart Citizens, vol. 4. FutureEverything Publications, Manchester (2013)
Khansari, N., Mostashari, A., Mansouri, M.: Impacting sustainable behavior and planning in smart city. Int. J. Sustain. Land Use Urban Plann. (IJSLUP) 1(2) (2014)
Klecha, L., Gianni, F.: Designing for sustainable urban mobility behaviour: a systematic review of the literature. In: Citizen, Territory and Technologies: Smart Learning Contexts and Practices, vol. 80, pp. 137–149. Springer (2018)
Krogstie, B.R., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: Understanding and supporting reflective learning processes in the workplace: the CSRL model. In: European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 151–164. Springer (2013)
Lam, D., Head, P.: Sustainable urban mobility. In: Energy, Transport, and the Environment, pp. 359–371. Springer (2012)
Lidman, K., Renström, S.: How to Design for Sustainable Behaviour? A Review of Design Strategies and an Empirical Study of Four Product Concepts. Chalmers University of Technology (2011)
Marsh, J., Molinari, F., Rizzo, F., et al.: Human smart cities: a new vision for redesigning urban community and Citizen’s Life. In: Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions, pp. 269–278. Springer (2016)
Mora, S., Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: Tiles: a card-based ideation toolkit for the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2017, pp. 587–598. ACM, Edinburgh (2017)
Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pp. 282–291. ACM (2011)
Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group (2003)
Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage, London (2005)
Petersen, S.A., Canova-Calori, I., Krogstie, B.R., Divitini, M.: Reflective learning at the workplace-the MIRROR design toolbox. In: European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 478–483 (2016)
Pettersen, I.N., Boks, C.: The ethics in balancing control and freedom when engineering solutions for sustainable behaviour. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 1(4), 287–297 (2008)
Ratti, C., Townsend, A.: The social nexus. Sci. Am. 305(3), 42–49 (2011)
Reiersølmoen, M., Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: DELTA: promoting young people participation in urban planning. In: Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development, vol. 80, pp. 77–89. Springer (2017)
Siegel, M.A., Beck, J.: Slow change interaction design. Interactions 21(1), 28–35 (2014)
Wood, W., Quinn, J.M., Kashy, D.A.: Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83(6), 1281 (2002)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the students and volunteers that participated in the evaluation workshops, and Dr. Simone Mora for his work on the Tiles toolkit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gianni, F., Klecha, L., Divitini, M. (2019). Tiles-Reflection: Designing for Reflective Learning and Change Behaviour in the Smart City. In: Knoche, H., Popescu, E., Cartelli, A. (eds) The Interplay of Data, Technology, Place and People for Smart Learning. SLERD 2018 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92021-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92022-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)