Advertisement

Sharing Community Data: Platform Collectivism for Managing Water Quality

  • John M. Carroll
  • Jordan Beck
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 95)

Abstract

We are investigating community data, which is data gathered, analyzed, interpreted, and used by members of a local community. We discuss the ways that developing data literacy could result in more substantive civic participation and decision-making. Community members are already engaged in community data practices. Our goal is to help make these data more visible and accessible throughout the community and to engage the community at large in deliberation and planning with respect to its data. We report high-level outcomes of a community data hackathon that we facilitated along with a group of local water quality stakeholders. In order to design and develop an open community data platform and to build social infrastructure to sustain a long-term community data project, we plan to organize a series of these community-wide hackathon events.

Keywords

Community data Data literacy Hackathons Platform collectivism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by a Faculty Fellowship from Student Engagement Network of Pennsylvania State University.

References

  1. Béguin, P.: Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interact. Comput. 15(5), 709–730 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., Wilderman, C.C.: Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education–a CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC (2009a)Google Scholar
  3. Botsman, R., Rogers, R.: What’s mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live (2011)Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, J.M.: The Neighborhood in the Internet: Design Research Projects in Community Informatics. Routledge, New York/London (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B.: Wild at home: the neighborhood as a living laboratory for HCI. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 20(3) (2013). Article 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, J.M., Chen, J., Yuan, C.W., Hanrahan, B.V.: In search of coproduction: smart services as reciprocal activities. IEEE Comput. 49(7), 26–32 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, J.M., Chin, G., Rosson, M.B., Neale, D.C.: The development of cooperation: five years of participatory design in the virtual school. In: Boyarski, D., Kellogg, W. (eds.) DIS 2000: Designing Interactive Systems, Brooklyn, New York, 17–19 August, pp. 239–251. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J.S.: Community Conflict. Free Press, Glencoe (1957)Google Scholar
  9. Gurstein, M.: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday 6(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers, and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29, 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koltay, T.: Data literacy: in search of a name and identity. J. Documentation 71(2), 401–415 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morelli, N., Aguilar, M., Concilio, G., Götzen, A.D., Mulder, I., Pedersen, J., Torntoft, L.K.: Framing design to support social innovation: The open4citizens project. Des. J. 20(1), 3171–3184 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. Ostrom, E.: Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24(6), 1073–1087 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raval, N., Dourish, P.: Standing out from the crowd: emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, pp. 97–107 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Simonsen, J., Hertzum, M.: Sustained participatory design: extending the iterative approach. Des. Issues 28(3), Summer 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorensen, D.C.: Reverse migration and the rural community development problem. West. J. Agric. Econ. 1(1), 49–55 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. Srnicek, N.: Platform Capitalism. Wiley (2016)Google Scholar
  18. Uhl, A., Gollenia, L.-A.: Digital enterprise transformation: a business-driven approach to leveraging innovative IT. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations