Skip to main content

Identifying Students Struggling in Courses by Analyzing Exam Grades, Self-reported Measures and Study Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover The Interplay of Data, Technology, Place and People for Smart Learning (SLERD 2018 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 95))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Technical educations often experience poor student performance and consequently high rates of attrition. Providing students with early feedback on their learning progress can assist students in self-study activities or in their decision-making process regarding a change in educational direction. In this paper, we present a set of instruments designed to identify at-risk undergraduate students in a Problem-based Learning (PBL) university, using an introductory programming course between two campus locations as a case study. Collectively, these instruments form the basis of a proposed learning ecosystem designed to identify struggling students by predicting their final exam grades in this course. We implemented this ecosystem at one of the two campus locations and analyzed how well the obtained data predicted the final exam grades compared to the other campus, where midterm exam grades alone were used in the prediction model. Results of a multiple linear regression model found several significant assessment predictors related to how often students attempted self-guided course assignments and their self-reported programming experience, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banas, J. R., Velez-Solic, A.: Designing effective online instructor training and professional development. In: Virtual Mentoring for Teachers: Online Professional Development Practices: Online Professional Development Practices, p. 1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flipping for mastery. Educ. Leadersh. 71, 24–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. In: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bøgelund, P., Justesen, K., Kolmos, A., Bylov, S.M.: Undersøgelse af frafald og fastholdelse ved medialogi og andre uddannelser ved det Teknisk-Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet 2015–2016: Arbejdsrapport Nr. 1. Aalborg Universitet (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A., Castaneda, M.B.: College persistence: structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. J. High. Educ. 64(2), 123–139 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casey, K., Gibson, P., Paris, I.: Mining moodle to understand student behaviour. In: International Conference on Engaging Pedagogy (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, M., Li, Y.: Smart Learning Environments. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, G.L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., Brzustoski, P.: Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science 324(5925), 400–403 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M., Vleeshouwers, J.: Predicting students drop out: a case study. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duckworth, A.L., Quinn, P.D.: Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit-S). J. Pers. Assess. 91(2), 166–174 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dweck, C.S.: Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, C., Palacios, L.: Interactive self assessment questions within a virtual environment. Int. J. e-Adoption (IJEA) 3, 1–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giovannella, C.: Smart learning eco-systems: “fashion” or “beef”? J. e-Learn. Knowl. Soc. 10(3), 15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giovannella, C., Rehm, M.: A critical approach to ICT to support participatory development of people centered smart learning ecosystems and territories. Aarhus Ser. Hum. Centered Comput. 1(1), 2 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glynn, J.G., Sauer, P.L., Miller, T.E.: A logistic regression model for the enhancement of student retention: the identification of at-risk freshmen. Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 1(8), 79–86 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green, L.S., Banas, J., Perkins, R.: The Flipped College Classroom: Conceptualized and Re-Conceptualized. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guerrero, W.: Flipped classroom and problem-based learning in higher education. In: Latin-American Context, Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education, p. 118 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herzog, S.: Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout/stopout vs. transfer: a first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. In: Proceedings of 44th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higher Education Research Institut: CIRP Freshman Survey – HERI (2017). https://heri.ucla.edu/cirp-freshman-survey/

  20. Lassibille, G., Gomez, L.N.: Why do higher education students drop out? Evidence from Spain. Educ. Econ. 16(1), 89–105 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leal, J.P., Queirós, R.: Using the learning tools interoperability framework for LMS integration in service oriented architectures. In: Technology Enhanced Learning, TECH-EDUCATION 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levitz, R.N.: Retention management system plus samples survey and report samples (2012). https://www.ruffalonl.com/complete-enrollment-management/student-success/rnl-retention-management-system-plus/samples

  23. Mayer, R.E.: Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 169–182 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Severance, C., Hardin, J., Whyte, A.: The coming functionality mash-up in personal learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 16(1), 47–62 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seymour, E., Hewitt, N.: Talking About Leaving. Westview Press, Boulder (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Touron, J.: The determination of factors related to academic achievement in the university: implications for the selection and counseling of students. High. Educ. 12, 399–410 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsukayama, E., Duckworth, A.L., Kim, B.: Domain-specific impulsivity in school-age children. Dev. Sci. 16(6), 879–893 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vygotsky, L.: Zone of proximal development. In: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, p. 157 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yeager, D.S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Brzustoski, P., Master, A., Hessert, W.T., Williams, M.E., Cohen, G.L.: Breaking the cycle of mistrust: wise interventions to provide critical feedback across the racial divide. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143(2), 804–824 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Clavio Christensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Christensen, B.C., Bemman, B., Knoche, H., Gade, R. (2019). Identifying Students Struggling in Courses by Analyzing Exam Grades, Self-reported Measures and Study Activities. In: Knoche, H., Popescu, E., Cartelli, A. (eds) The Interplay of Data, Technology, Place and People for Smart Learning. SLERD 2018 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics