Skip to main content

Multimodal Propositions and Metaphors in the Movie Submarine: An Application of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Meanings & Co.

Part of the book series: Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress ((NAHP,volume 6))

Abstract

This chapter integrates Charles Peirce’s doctrine of Dicisigns in the cognitive semiotics of film. It makes use of Peirce’s concept of proposition to develop a framework for the analysis of multimodal meaning construction. As such, this theoretical addition to the cognitive semiotic theory of film illustrates how information is conveyed and, also, how arguments and metaphors are developed multimodally in the cinematic medium. The theory is further on developed and illustrated by an analysis of the movie Submarine (Ayoade in Submarine, 157, 2010). Particularly, the chapter discusses how propositional structures are formed through cinematic techniques and how the two metaphors “light/darkness is life/death” and “submarine biology is submarine psychology” participate in the unfolding of the movie’s narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barsalou, Lawrence. 1999. Perceptual symbol system. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, Jeff and Gunther Kress. 2008. Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication 25 (2): 166–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Per Aage. 2005. Mental spaces and cognitive semantics: A critical moment. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1578–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Per Aage. 2007. On consciousness and semiosis. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 1: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Line, and Per Aage Brandt. 2005. Cognitive poetics and imagery. European Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, Warren. 2000. The cognitive semiotics of film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. 1982. Introducing semiotics. Its history and doctrine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding: the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, John. 2009. Augustine and Poinsot. The protosemiotic development, volume 1 in the Postmodernity in Philosophy Poinsot Trilogy: Determining the Standpoint for a Doctrine of Signs. Scranton, London: University of Scranton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunthorne, Joe. 2008. Submarine. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco [Kant and the Platypus]. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmslev, Louis. 1954. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Trans. F. J. Whitfield. Madison: Universtiy of Madisson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer. 2008. The biosemiotic body. Biosemiotics 1: 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1990. On language. In ed. L. R. Waugh and M. Monville-Burston. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, André. 1962. A functional view of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, Winfried (ed.). 2006. Semiotic bodies, aesthetic embodiments, and cyberbodies. Kassel: Kassel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1935 and 1958. The collected papers of charles sanders peirce, ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, vols. I–VI, ed. W. Arthur Burks, vols. VII–VIII. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959 [1915]. Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alin Olteanu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Olteanu, A. (2019). Multimodal Propositions and Metaphors in the Movie Submarine: An Application of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. In: Olteanu, A., Stables, A., Borţun, D. (eds) Meanings & Co.. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91986-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91986-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91985-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91986-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics