Skip to main content

Man vs. the System: Turkish Foreign Policy After the Arab Uprisings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Fear and Uncertainty in Europe

Part of the book series: Global Issues ((GLOISS))

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the much-debated Turkish foreign policy preferences towards the Middle East during the Arab uprisings through a neoclassical realist framework. Turkey is a middle power in the international system and in order to grasp Turkey’s decision makers’ policy toward the region, it is important to comprehend human factors (perceptions, analysis, heuristics, analogies, cultural references) and variables of domestic politics (public opinion, electoral processes, border cities, Turkey’s own ethno-religious structure). If we only examine systemic factors, it is impossible to explain tensions derived from asymmetries between roles and motivations of a state prescribed by its leaders and its actual abilities. In this context, explanations regarding domestic politics and character of leadership become important. Examining how decision makers reach specific decisions through interpreting structural pressures and Turkey’s desire to “shape” the region with its own cognitive perspectives as well as how they synthesize this with the necessities of the domestic political cycles will provide an insight to understand decisions that seem unintelligible at first glance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For neoclassical realism as an approach rather than a theory, see Donnelly in this volume.

  2. 2.

    We use Holsti’s (1970) descriptions for foreign policy roles such as “balancer” and “global and regional collaborator” unless otherwise stated. “Balancer” for example refers to states that aim to maintain regional or global balance of power. “Global and regional collaborator” refers to “far-reaching commitments to cooperative efforts with other states to build wider communities, or to cross-cutting subsystems…” (Holsti 1970: 266).

  3. 3.

    In general, “bridge” role refers to “acting as a ‘translator’ or conveyor of messages and information between peoples of different culture” (Holsti 1970: 267). For Turkey as a bridge between different civilizations and faiths see Yanik (2009).

References

  • Ayata, Bilgin. 2014. “Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing Arab World: Rise and Fall of a Regional Actor?” Journal of European Integration 37 (1): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakmak, Haydar. 2008. Türk dış politikası, 1919–2008. Ankara: Platin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Thomas J. 1996. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2003. Stratejik derinlik: Türkiye’nin uluslararası konumu. Istanbul: Küre Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Davutoğlu: Masaya ilişenlerden değil kuranlardan olacağız.” 2010. Milliyet, 21 May. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/davutoglu-masaya-ilisenlerden-degil-kuranlardan-olacagiz/siyaset/siyasetdetay/21.05.2010/1240909/default.htm. Accessed 10 September 2014.

  • “Davutoğlu: Türkiye Artık Yükselen Ilımlı Bir Güç.” 2011. Zaman, 6 March. http://www.zaman.com.tr/ekonomi_davutoglu-turkiye-artik-yukselen-ilimli-bir-guc_1103284.html. Accessed 7 December 2014.

  • Devlen, Balkan, and Ozgur Ozdamar. 2009. “Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Crises.” In Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation, edited by Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan, Recep Tayyip. 2014. “Mazlumların Yanında Duruyoruz.-7 Ağustos 2014.” AK Parti Resmi İnternet Sayfası. http://www.akparti.org.tr/mobil/haberler/tek-yurek-halinde-mazlumlarin-yanindayiz/65882. Accessed 9 September 2014.

  • Friedberg, Aaron L. 1988. The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, David. 2015. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy of ‘Precious Loneliness’.” Financial Times, 16 November. https://www.ft.com/content/69662b36–7752-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7.

  • Gül, Abdullah. 2011. “Türkiye Bölgesel Lider Olarak Hareket Etmektedir.” Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, 8 August. http://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/170/80436/turkiye-bolgesel-lider-olarak-hareket-etmektedir.html. Accessed 10 September 2014.

  • Holsti, K.J. 1970. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14 (3): 233–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Waltz. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Libya: Turkey’s Trouble with NATO and No-Fly Zone.” 2011. BBC, 25 March. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12864742. Accessed 5 September 2014.

  • “Mecliste Gergin Suriye Oturumu.” Radikal. http://www.radikal.com.tr/politika/mecliste/gergin/suriye/oturumu-1086125. Accessed 7 December 2014.

  • Onis, Ziya. 2011. “Multiple Faces of ‘New’ Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and Critique.” Insight Turkey 13 (1): 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onis, Ziya, and Suhnaz Yilmaz. 2005. “The Turkey-EU-US Triangle in Perspective: Transformation or Continuity?” The Middle East Journal 59 (2): 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onis, Ziya, and Suhnaz Yilmaz. 2009. “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey During the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 10 (1): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Oyun kurucu olarak Türkiye.” 2012. 24Haber Portalı, 21 April. http://www.yirmidorthaber.com/yazar/Oyun_kurucu_olarak_Turkiye/haber-548888. Accessed 10 September 2014.

  • Özdamar, Özgür. 2014. “Türkiye’nin Dış Politika Rolleri: Ampirik Bir Yaklaşım.” TÜBİTAK SOBAG Proje No: 112K163, Bitirme Raporu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdamar, Özgür. 2016. “Domestic Sources of Changing Turkish Foreign Policy towards the MENA During 2010s: A Role Theoretic Approach.” In Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations, edited by Christian Cantir and Juliet Kaarbo. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdamar, Özgür, B. Toygar Halistoprak, and İ. Erkam Sula. 2014. “From Good Neighbor to Model: Turkey’s Changing Roles in the Middle East in the Aftermath of the Arab Spring.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 11 (42): 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall L. 2004. “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing.” International Security 29 (2): 159–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat General for EU Affairs. 2007. Political Reforms in Turkey. Ankara: M&B Tanıtım Hizmetleri ve Tic. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack. 1993. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşpınar, Ömer. 2012. “Turkey’s Strategic Vision and Syria.” The Washington Quarterly 35 (3): 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TESEV. 2012. “Ortadoğu’da Türkiye Algısı 2012.” TESEV Foreign Policy Programme report prepared by M. Akgün and S.S. Gündoğar. Istanbul: TESEV Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, Natalie. 2005. “Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Turkish PM Says Limited Action Against Syria Won’t Be Enough, Calls for Kosovo-Like Intervention.” 2013. Hürriyet Daily News, 13 August. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-pm-says-limited-action-against-syria-wont-be-enough-calls-for-kosovo-like-intervention.aspx?pageID=238&nid=53586. Accessed 10 September 2014.

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William C. 1993. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanık, Lerna K. 2009. “The Metamorphosis of Metaphors of Vision: “Bridging” Turkey’s Location, Role and Identity After the End of the Cold War.” Geopolitics 14 (3): 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, Fareed. 1998. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by a TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey ) grant (Number 112K169).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Özdamar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Özdamar, Ö., Devlen, B. (2019). Man vs. the System: Turkish Foreign Policy After the Arab Uprisings. In: Belloni, R., Della Sala, V., Viotti, P. (eds) Fear and Uncertainty in Europe . Global Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics