Skip to main content

Death by Representation: In Law, in Literature, and in That Space Between

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Saramago’s Philosophical Heritage
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter reads José Saramago’s All the Names and Death at Intervals and suggests that although the symbolic order fetishizes the dead letter, works of art can resurrect inert signifiers and turn them into living, breathing, and growing bodies. The argument is that what allows Saramago’s texts to persist beyond the death wreaked by representation are two miracles that take place in the interstices of signification: first the miracle of love and second the miracle of poetry and in particular of metaphor. These miracles, I argue, form the backbone of Saramago’s texts, suggesting that the loss, or death, inflicted by the signifier can be rejoined, pasted, or united in a space between the symbolic and the Real, between law and literature.

This chapter is a slightly modified version of an article previously published as “Bare Law Between Two Lives: José Saramago and Cornelia Vismann on Naming, Filing and Cancelling,” in Daniela Carpi and Jeanne Gaakeer (eds.), Liminal Discourses: Subliminal Tensions in Law and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyters, 2013), pp. 37–52. I am grateful to de Gruyters for permission to reuse the material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “The first act by which Adam established his lordship over the animals is this, that he gave them a name, i.e., he nullified them as beings on their own account” (Hegel 1979, p. 221). Lacan continues this theme: “Thus the symbol manifests itself as the killing of the thing, and this death results in the endless perpetuation of the subject’s desire” (Lacan 2006c, p. 262).

  2. 2.

    See also p. 133: “the state, the bureau, and the file were arranged in such a way that the entire order could be derived from the smallest element, the state from a single file.”

  3. 3.

    “The paradigm of diplomatics focuses attention on the transmitted law, not on the transmission itself. So the erratic side of the law, the administrative operations, the transmission medium itself—remains a blind-spot for legal history. When the emphasis is on results, certifications, validity, and storage capacities, files, as mere transmission media, have no epistemological place. They are treated as the other of diplomas, as ‘non-documents’” (Vismann 2008, p. 75).

  4. 4.

    “Taboos still exist among us. Though expressed in a negative form and directed toward another subject-matter, they do not differ in their psychological nature from Kant’s ‘categorical imperative’, which operates in a compulsive fashion and rejects any conscious motives” (Freud 1955, p. xiv).

  5. 5.

    I explore this question in Aristodemou 2011.

  6. 6.

    For an incisive analysis of Eichmann’s actions from a Lacanian perspective, see MacCannell 1996.

  7. 7.

    Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck’s 2006 film The Life of Others is one famous recent attempt to portray this paradox.

  8. 8.

    Saramago’s point here is reminiscent of the constant search for God, or the origin of origins, of Borges’s characters and in particular his short story “The Library of Babel”; I examined this aspect of Borges’s fiction in chapter 9 of Aristodemou 2000.

  9. 9.

    Saramago comments again on number 100 as “a frontier, a limit, a ne plus” (AN 19).

  10. 10.

    “To language then, to language alone, it is that fictitious entities owe their existence—their impossible yet indispensable existence,” quoted in Ogden 1932, p. xxxii. Lacan confirms the importance of Bentham’s theory of fictions to an understanding of the subject’s capture by the signifier: “Bentham , as that work of his which has recently drawn some attention shows, is the man who approaches the question at the level of the signifier” (1992, p. 228)

Works Cited

  • Aristodemou, Maria. 2000. Law and Literature: Journeys from Her to Eternity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Where God Was Law Will Be? Kant Avec Houellebecq. Australian Feminist Law Journal 34: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1986. The Writing of the Disaster. Trans. Ann Smock. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2001. Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life. Trans. Anne Boyman. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1955. Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement Between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIII (1913–1914): Totem and Taboo and Other Works, ed. James Strachey, vii–162. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1957a. Five Lectures on Psychoanalysis. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XI (1910): Five Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Leonardo Da Vinci and Other Works, ed. James Strachey, 3–55. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1957b. “Thoughts for the Times on War and Death” (1915). In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV (1914–1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works, ed. James Strachey, 275–299. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961. “The Future of an Illusion” (1927). In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXI (1927–1931): The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents, and Other Works, ed. James Strachey, 5–56. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1979. System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of Spirit (1803–4). Ed. and Trans. H. S. Harris and T. M. Knox. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Thomas K. Abbott. Sioux Falls: NuVision Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1977. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, Trans. Alan Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959–1960. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, Trans. Dennis Porter. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III: The Psychoses. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, Trans. Russell Grigg. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX: Encore. On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006a. Seminar on The Purloined Letter. In Écrits (pp. 6–49). Trans. Bruce Fink. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006b. The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious. In Écrits (pp. 671–702). Trans. Bruce Fink. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006c. The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. In Écrits (pp. 197–268). Trans. Bruce Fink. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, Juliet Flower. 1996. Fascism and the Voice of Conscience. In Radical Evil, ed. Joan Copjec, 46–73. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, Herman. 1967. Bartleby, the Scrivener. In Billy Budd, Sailor and Other Stories, 1–46. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, Charles K. 1932. Bentham’s Theory of Fictions. New York: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, Fernando. 2001. The Book of Disquiet. Trans. Richard Zenith. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismann, Cornelia. 2008. Files: Law and Media Technology. Trans. Geoffrey Winthrop-Young. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, Alenka. 2000. Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Aristodemou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aristodemou, M. (2018). Death by Representation: In Law, in Literature, and in That Space Between. In: Salzani, C., Vanhoutte, K. (eds) Saramago’s Philosophical Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91923-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics