Skip to main content

Language Transfer vs. Language Talent? Individual Differences and Aptitude in L2 Phonology of Persian-Speaking Learners of English

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 16))

Abstract

Only little research regarding the phonology of Persian native speakers’ English has been conducted. In the present study, we compared different individual cognitive factors which result in ESL Iranian English pronunciation, such as cognitive ability and short-term memory (working memory and Llama_D), language aptitude (MLAT III, IV and V; Llama_D) and working memory (Tewes U, Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenz-Test für Erwachsene Revision. HAWIE-R, Bern, 1994). These measures were correlated with English pronunciation and phonetic measurements (vowel length measurement) of Persian ESL learners. The sample comprised 30 Iranians aged 20–40 years (mean age 26.08) with L1 Farsi and an academic education. Their age of onset of learning (AOA) ranged from 2 to 16 years (mean age 11.03). Three learner groups were identified based on their language proficiency, and results confirmed previous findings about the contribution of cognitive factors (Rota G, Reiterer SM, Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. In: Dogil G, Reiterer S (eds) Language talent and brain activity. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 67–96, 2009), language aptitude and multilingualism in L2 phonological processing. We observed significant correlations between English pronunciation scores and these three factors: schwa length pronunciation (r = −0.8), MLAT III (r = 0.8) and working memory (r = 0.78). Schwa length pronunciation also correlated highly with the number of languages (r = −.74) and the age of onset of acquisition (r = .41). Our cross-linguistic results suggest that phonological native-like L2 achievement in ESL adult learners is possible, as individuals with higher L2 aptitude and working memory capacity can overcome the transfer of L1 phonological categories in L2 processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. In Grune & Stratten. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 25–53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). The modern languages aptitude test. San Antonio. Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner:Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and Phonotactic probability effects on children’s production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erard, M. (2012). Babel no more: The search for the world’s most extraordinary language learners. New York: Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodie approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2012). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioup, G. (2008). Exploring the role of age in the acquisition of a second language phonology. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 41–57). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native mandarin speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1280–1299. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D., Long, M. H., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255(5044), 606–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, B. (2000). Emergent phonology. In Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, pp. 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, R. C. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 63–83). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., & Friedman, D. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, B., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2005). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, B., Kurtz, B. A., & Windsor, J. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauchi, A., & Sakai, K. L. (2009). Greater leftward lateralization of the inferior frontal gyrus in second language learners with higher syntactic abilities. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3625–3635. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuner, S. (2002). Lernen als Verarbeitung von Informationen, Konditionstheoretische Übelegungen zum Fremsprachenunterricht. Babylonia, 10, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obler, L. K., & Fein, D. (1988). The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. A. (1946). Meaningful similarity and interference in leaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimsleur, P. (1966). The Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. (2000). Predicting the future of foreign language aptitude. In S. Cornwell & P. Robinson (Eds.), Individual differences in foreign language learning: Effects of aptitude, intelligence, and motivation (pp. 187–197). Tokyo, Japan: Aoyama Gakuin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiterer, S. M., Hu, X., Erb, M., Rota, G., Nardo, D., Grodd, W., et al. (2011). Individual differences in audio-vocal speech imitation aptitude in late bilinguals: Functional neuro-imaging and brain morphology. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(271), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiterer, S. M., Hu, X., Sumathi, T. S., & Singh, N. C. (2013). Are you a good mimic? Neuro-acoustic signatures for speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(782), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rota, G., & Reiterer, S. M. (2009). Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. In G. Dogil & S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 67–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scovel, T. (1998). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic enquiry into the critical period for human speech. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International review of applied linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 209–231).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed Language Learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2011). Language aptitude. In S. Gassand & A. Mackay (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1995). Prognostication and language aptitude testing, 1925–1962. Language Testing, 12(3), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W., & Dittmann, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewes, U. (1994). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenz-Test für Erwachsene Revision. Bern, Switzerland: HAWIE-R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S. G. (2001). Language contact. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4(2), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Z. (2011). Foreign language aptitude. ELT Journal, 66(2), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychobiology, 24, 672–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. C., & Ettlinger, M. (2011). Predictors of spoken language learning. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(5), 564–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaleh Ghafoorian Maddah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maddah, Z.G., Reiterer, S.M. (2018). Language Transfer vs. Language Talent? Individual Differences and Aptitude in L2 Phonology of Persian-Speaking Learners of English. In: Reiterer, S. (eds) Exploring Language Aptitude: Views from Psychology, the Language Sciences, and Cognitive Neuroscience. English Language Education, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91917-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91917-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91916-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91917-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics