Advertisement

Impediment or Resource? Contextualisation of the Shared Built Heritage in Turkey

  • Deniz Ikiz KayaEmail author
  • Mehmet Calhan
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict book series (PSCHC)

Abstract

Since the establishment of Turkey as a nation state in the beginning of the twentieth century, government has tried to use architectural heritage as an instrument for nation-building. However, this has not been done without disagreement on the meaning of many heritage sites in the country. These sites were de-contextualised and subsequently re-contextualised to fit the new social values government ascribed to them, leading to the exclusion of minority communities. This chapter examines the processes of de- and re-contextualisation of Greek Orthodox places of worship in Asia Minor that have been vandalised, neglected or reused in accordance with the national interest and policies, thus revealing government’s role in cultural contestation.

References

  1. Amygdalou, K. (2014). Building the Nation at the Crossroads of ‘East’ and ‘West’: Ernest Hebrard and Henri Prost in the Near East. Opticon 1826, 16(15), 1–19.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B. J., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2007). Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  3. Atakuman, C. (2010). Value of Heritage in Turkey. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 23(1), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bugatti, E. (2013). Urban Identities and Catastrophe: Izmir and Salonica at the End of the Ottoman Empire. The Geographical Review, 103(4), 498–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calhan, M. (2014). Shared Built Heritage: From Burden to Resource—A Comparison Between Izmir and Thessaloniki on the Basis of Conservation and Use of the ‘Other’ Religious Heritage After the Mass Migrations of the Twentieth Century. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, RLICC, University of Leuven, Leuven.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, B., & Howard, P. (Eds.). (2008). The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity. London: Assignee.Google Scholar
  7. Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009). Reciprocity as Race to the Bottom in Religious Freedom. In K. A. N. K. Ö. Othon Anastasakis (Ed.), In the Long Shadow of Europe: Greeks and Turks in the Era of Post-nationalism (pp. 167–190). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ICOMOS Shared Built Heritage. (2012). Cultural Heritage Connections [Online]. Available at: http://www.culturalheriageconnections.org/wiki/ICOMOS_Shared_Built_Heritage. Accessed 14 Nov 2015.
  10. Kriesberg, L. (2003). Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
  11. Levantine Heritage. (2011). Levantine Heritage [Online]. Available at: http://www.levantineheritage.com. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  12. Logan, W. (2012). Cultural Diversity, Cultural Heritage and Human Rights: Towards Heritage Management as Human Rights-Based Cultural Practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(3), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McEvoy, J. (2011). Managing Culture in Post-conflict Societies. Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 66(1), 55–71.Google Scholar
  14. Murzyn, M. A., & Gwozdz, K. (2003). Dilemmas Encountered in the Development of Tourism in a Degraded Town: The Case of Schömberg in Lower Silesia. Prace Geograficzne, 111, 183–198.Google Scholar
  15. Nyiri. P. (2006). Scenic Spots: Chinese Tourism, the State and Cultural Authority. Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  16. Oakes, T. S. (1993). The Cultural Space of Modernity: Ethnic Tourism and Place Identity in China. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(1): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olwig, K. R. (2005). Introduction. In D. Lowenthal & K. R. Olwig (Eds.), The Nature of Cultural Heritage, and the Culture of National Heritage—Northern Perspective on a Contested Patrimony (pp. 1–7). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar
  18. Oran, B. (2008). Reciprocity in Turco-Greek Empire and Modern Turkey Relations: The Case of Minorities. In S. Akgonul (Ed.), Reciprocity Greek and Turkish Minorities Law, Religion and Politics (pp. 35–38). Istanbul: Bilgi University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, M. H. (2007). Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ross, M. H. (2009). Culture in Comparative Political Analysis. In M. I. Lichbach & A. Zuckerman (Eds.), Rationality, Culture and Structure (pp. 134–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sahin Guchan, N., & Kurul, E. (2009). A History of the Development of Conservation Measures in Turkey: From the Mid-19th Century Until 2004. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 26(2), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaw, S. J., & Shaw, E. K. (2003). Reform, Revolution and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey, 1808–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, R. P. B. (2008). The Contestation of Heritage: The Enduring Importance of Religion. In B. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity (pp. 125–141). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Timothy, D. J., & Conover, P. J. (2006). Nature Religion, Self-spirituality and New Age Tourism. In D. J. Timothy & D. H. Olsen (Eds.), Tourism, Religion and Spiritual Journeys (pp. 139–155). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Uras, G. (2002). Levantenler İzmir'in rengi-tadı. Hurriyet, 7 9.Google Scholar
  28. Watenpaugh, H. Z. (2014). Preserving the Medieval City of Ani: Cultural Heritage Between Contest and Reconciliation. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 73(4), 528–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winter, T. (2015). Heritage Diplomacy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(10), 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. World Monuments Fund. (2014). Central Izmir Synagogues [Online]. Available at: http://www.wmf.org/project/centralizmir-synagogues. Accessed 6 Aug 2014.
  31. Yazıcıoğlu, G. B. (2007). Archaeological Politics of Anatolia: Imaginative Identity of an Imaginative Geography. In L. Popova, C. Hartley & A. Smith (Eds.), Social Orders and Social Landscapes (pp. 218–252). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Yenisehirlioglu, F. C. (1998). Decontextualisation and Decontextualisation of Ottoman Cultural Heritage in Post-Ottoman Nation States. In M. Korzay, et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Heritage Multicultural Attractions and Tourism (pp. 119–140). Istanbul: Bogazici University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Zeren, M. T., & Erdogmuş, B. (2011). 19. yuzyil Kordelyası’nda gayrimuslim dini yapilari. Ege Mimarilk, 7, 18–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArchitectureOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations