Abstract
This chapter examines the associations between driver gender, risk behavior when driving motor vehicles, and the inclination to acquire automobile insurance. To inform this investigation, a random survey was conducted of 566 middle-class adults. By using nonparametric tests and logit models, the results suggest that even when controlling for other variables, women feel a greater need than men to have automobile insurance in the event of possible accidents under rainy conditions and to have access to driver support services. Women also tend to have more respect for speed limits in various situations, such as during the rush hour, on local roads and on highways. The results also showed that men feel safer than women when driving in more precarious situations: at night, in unfamiliar areas, after drinking, or when they are tired. These results, while contributing to the theoretical development of road traffic and transportation safety, are of special relevance to the financial industry and the regulatory agency. The insurance industry may find these results particularly helpful in designing future policies and setting premiums.
Portions of this chapter appeared in the 2017 paper “Gender differences in attitudes towards driving and demand for private Insurance: Evidence from middle class drivers,” Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol 47, pp 72–85.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a discussion about UBI, see Wells, J.R., and Danskin, G. (2014). Progressive 2007–2013. Harvard Cases #9–715-427.
References
Bacchieri, G., Barros, A. J., Santos, J. V., & Gigante, D. P. (2011). Cycling to work in Brazil: Users profile, risk behaviors, and traffic accident occurrence. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1408–1413.
Baer, W. (2014). The Brazilian economy: Growth & development (7th ed.). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Bergdahl, J. (2005). Sex differences in attitudes toward driving: A survey. The Social Science Journal, 42, 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2005.09.006.
Bergdahl, J., & Norris, M. R. (2002). Sex differences in single vehicle fatal crashes: A research note. The Social Science Journal, 39, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00169-6.
Campos, V. R., Silva, R. S., Dualibi, S., Santos, J. F., Laranjeira, R., & Pinsky, I. (2013). The effect of the new traffic law on drinking and driving in São Paulo. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 622–627.
Cestac, J., Paran, F., & Delhomme, P. (2011). Young drivers sensation seeking, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control and their roles in predicting speeding intention: How risk-taking motivations evolve with gender and driving experience. Safety Science, 49, 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.10.007.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007.
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021591.
DATASUS (2010). Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Available at: http://www.datasus.gov.br.
De Boni, R., Bastos, F. I., Vasconcellos, M., Oliveira, F., Limberger, R. P., & Pechansky, I. (2013). Drug use among drivers who drank on alcohol outlets from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, 137–142.
Denatran. (2014). Departamento Nacional de Trânsito-Denatran. Available at: http://www.denatran.gov.br/frota.htm.
DEPEN-Departamento Penitenciário Nacional, Justice Department of Brazil. (2014). Levantamento Nacional de Informações Penitenciárias Info-Mulheres. Available at: https://www.justica.gov.br/noticias/estudo-traca-perfil-da-populacao-penitenciaria-feminina-no-brasil/relatorio-infopen-mulheres.pdf.
DPVAT. (2013). Seguro Obrigatório de Danos Pessoais Causados por Veículos Automotores de Via Terrestre-DPVAT. Available at: www.dpvatsegurodotransito.com.br.
Efrat, K., & Shoham, A. (2013). The theory of planned behavior, materialism, and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.023.
Falk, B., & Montgomery, H. (2009). Promoting traffic safety among young male drivers by means of elaboration-based interventions. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.06.001.
Farrow, J. A., & Brissing, P. (1990). Risk for DUI: A new look at gender differences in drinking and driving influences, experiences, and attitudes among new adolescent drivers. Health Education Quarterly, 17, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819001700207.
FBSP. (2016). Forum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública, 2016 Available at: http://www.forumseguranca.org.br/storage/download//anuario_site_18-11-2016-retificado.pdf.
Fergunson, S. A., Braitman, K. A. (2006). Women’s issues in highway safety: Summary of the literature. In Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP35v1.pdf.
Fowler, F. J. (1998). Design and evaluation of survey questions. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 343–374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedl, A., Ring, P., & Schmidt, U. (2017). Theory and Decision, 82(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9565-9.
González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Luengo-Martín, M. A. (2012). Driving anger and traffic violations: Gender differences. Transportation Research Part F, 15, 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.002.
Gurin, D. B. (1981). Women’s future travel, driving, and transit use. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb01061.x.
Hautzinger, S. J. (1997). “Calling a state a state”: Feminist politics and the policing of violence against the women in Brazil. Feminist Issues, 15(1–2), 3–30.
IBGE. (2013). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE. In Senso Demográfico 2010. ISBN: 9788524042812. Available at: http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=264529.
Inouei, A., & Kilian, L. (2005). In-sample or out-of-sample tests of predictability: Which one should we use? Econometric Reviews, 23, 371–402. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-200040785.
Johnson, M. B., Voas, R. B., & Miller, B. A. (2012). Driving decisions when leaving electronic music dance events: Driver, passenger, and group effects. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13, 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2012.678954.
Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2013). Managing Catastrophic Risks Through Redesigned Insurance: Challenges and Opportunities. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of insurance (Vol. XXVI., 1126p., 2nd ed., pp. 517–546). Springer Nature. ISBN: 978-1493908615.
Li, P., Shi, J., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2016). The theory of planned behavior and competitive driving in China. Procedia Engineering, 137, 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.270.
Lonczak, H. S., Neighbors, C., & Donovan, D. M. (2007). Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.010.
Machin, M. A., & Sankey, K. S. (2008). Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 541–547.
Mannering, F. L. (1993). Male/female driver characteristics and accident risk: Some new evidence. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(93)90098-H.
Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Garcia, F. G., & Motoryn, M. (2014). Survey well being Brasil: Cidade de São Paulo. Available at: http://ag.taxi.br/projetos/myfuncity/WBB_RELATORIO_SP.pdf.
Meyer, M. D. (2006). Women’s issues in transportation: Policy and planning. In Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35, Proceedings, Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP35v1.pdf.
Møller, M., & Haustein, S. (2014). Peer influence on speeding behaviour among male drivers aged 18 and 28. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 64, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.009.
Nunen, K. V., Reniers, G., Ponnet, K., & Cozzani, V. (2016). Major accident prevention decision-making: A large-scale survey-based analysis. Safety Science, 88, 242–250.
Obst, P., Armstrong, K., Smith, S., & Banks, T. (2011). Age and gender comparisions of driving while sleepy: Behaviours and risk perceptions. Transportation Research Part F, 14, 539–542.
Oltedal, S., & Rundmo, T. (2006). The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety Science, 44, 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.003.
Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers, driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research Part F, 9, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.005.
Parker, D., Reason, J. T., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38, 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925170.
Patton, A. J. (2004). On the out-of-sample importance of skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset allocation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1), 130–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbh006.
Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2011). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York: Guilford.
Renzetti, C. M., Miller, S. L., & Gover, A. R. (2013). Routledge international handbook of crime and gender studies. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Schroeder, P., Meyers, M., & Kostyniuk, L. (2013). National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors, 2012. Report no. DOT HS 811-729. Washington, DC: National Highway Trafic Safety Administration.
Schwebel, D. C., Severson, J., Ball, K. K., & Rizzo, M. (2006). Individual difference factors in risky driving: The roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.004.
Scott-Parker, B., Watson, B., King, M. J., & Hyde, M. K. (2012). “They’re lunatics on the road”: Exploring the normative influences of parents, friends, and police on young novices’ risky driving decisions. Safety Science, 50, 1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.014.
Simons-Morton, B. G., Ouimet, M. C., Zhang, Z., Klauer, S. E., Lee, S. E., Wang, J., Chen, R., Albert, P., & Dingus, T. A. (2011). The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.009.
SIRC-Social Issues Research Centre. (2004). Sex differences in driving and insurance risk: An analysis of the social and psychological differences between men and women that are relevant to their driving behavior. Available: http://www.sirc.org/publik/driving.pdf.
SUSEP (2013). Sistema de EstatÚsticas da SUSEP. Available at: http://www2.susep.gov.br/menuestatistica/SES/principal.aspx
SUSEP. (2016). Superintendência de Seguros Privados. Stolen Car Index (Índice de Veículos Roubados). Available at: http://blog.suhaiseguradora.com/consultar-indice-veiculos-roubados.
Velloso, M. S., & Jacques, M. A. P. (2012). On-the-spot study of pedestrian crashes on Brazilian Federal District rural highways crossing urban areas. Transportation Research Part F, 15, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.06.001.
Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 361–385.
West, R., French, D., Kemp, R., & Elander, J. (1993). Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 36, 557–567.
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
WHO. (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: Supporting a decade of action. World Health Organization-WHO. Available at: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/
Wieczorek, W. E., Mirand, A. L., & Callahan, C. P. (1994). Perception of the risk of arrest for drinking and driving. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 312–326.
WIIT. (2014). In Women’s Issues in Transportation, Proceedings, Paris. Available at: http://wiit-paris2014.sciencesconf.org/conference/wiit-paris2014/pages/Proceedings_The_5th_International_Conference_on_WIiT_1.pdf.
Wolf, C. C., Ocklenburg, S., Ören, B., Becker, C., Hofstätter, A., Bös, C., Popken, M., Thorstensen, T., & Güntürkün, O. (2010). Sex differences in parking are affected by biological and social factors. Psychological Research, 74, 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0267-6.
Zhang, M. (2010). Competitiveness and growth in Brazilian cities: Local policies and actions for innovation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Zuckerman, M. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lucas, E.C., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Lyons, A.C. (2019). Gender Differences and Automobile Insurance Acquisition. In: Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (eds) Individual Behaviors and Technologies for Financial Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91911-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91911-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91910-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91911-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)