Abstract
Ever since Intel launched its successful 22-nm Ivy Bridge CPU chip, establishing nonplanar finFET technology as a viable means of extending Moore’s law, variations of the basic finFET or the nanowire transistor have been introduced into nanoelectronics research and manufacturing efforts at an unprecedented rate.
All members of the finFET family of devices—whether fabricated on a bulk or SOI substrate, or structured as a double- or triple-gate or a nanowire transistor—share the same fundamental operating mechanism: the electric field effect. Drain current is under the control of a gate voltage that modulates the conductivity of the underlying fin or nanowire. This tutorial derives qualitative I-V characteristics for such devices, using intuitive assumptions and principles like Ohm’s law and Poisson’s equation.
It then focuses on the geometric characteristics of nonplanar devices, examining the layout of a typical CMOS standard cell comprising both n- and p-type finFETs. The use of a local interconnect layer to connect adjacent fins is detailed. A section is devoted to explaining why nonplanar devices exhibit higher immunity to short-channel effects (SCEs). To quantify this explanation, the natural screening length parameter λ is introduced and then computed for several common device types.
The tutorial cites a dozen intuitive rules of thumb that engineers and scientists may find useful in evaluating finFET design issues and device trade-offs. During the discussion, key electrical and physical finFET properties are related to their corresponding BSIM-CMG SPICE parameters, including GEOMOD and NFIN.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38:114
Thackray A (2015) Moore’s law. Basic Books, New York, p 243, 253–262
Dunga MV, Lin C-H, Niknejad AM, Hu C (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Table 3.1
James D Intel Ivy Bridge unveiled (Chipworks), djames@chipworks.com
Gargini P (Intel Fellow) (2003) In: NanoManufacturing symposium (2003), p 19, from: http://web.mit.edu/nanosymposium/www/Presentations/Gargini2Part1.pdf
Xiong W (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 2.2.6
Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J (1993) Fundamentals of physics, 4 edn. Wiley, New York, Section 45–4
Kim DM et al (2014) In: Kim DM, Jeong Y-H (eds) Nanowire FETs: principles and applications. Springer, New York, Section 4.1
Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors, Springer, New York, Section 1.5.2.1
Colinge J-P, Greer JC (2016) Nanowire transistors: physics of devices and materials in one dimension. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Equation 2.20
Routenberg D Fabrication and characterization of silicon nanowire field effect sensors. PhD Thesis, Yale University, Section 2.1
US Patent 2017/0133509 A1, FinFET, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (2017) Section [0036]
Craig Casey H Jr (1999) Devices for integrated circuits. Wiley, New York, Figure 8–6
Craig Casey H Jr (1999) Devices for integrated circuits. Wiley, New York, p 291
Mead C, Conway L (1980) Introduction to VLSI systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Equation (1–1)
Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Figure 3.8
Sze SM (2002) Semiconductor devices: physics and technology, 2 edn. Wiley, Hoboken, Section 6.2.1
Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, p 74
Paydavosi N et al BSIM-SPICE models enable FinFET and UTB IC designs (IEEE Access, Vol.1, 2013), Equation (1)
Chauhan YS et al (2015) FinFET modeling for IC simulation and design: using the BSIM-CMG standard. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Equation 3.12
See for example: Moroz V FinFET structure design & variability analysis enabled by TCAD (EE Times, 8 Oct. 2012) Figure 3
Chauhan YS et al (2015) FinFET modeling for IC simulation and design: using the BSIM-CMG standard. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 71
Paydavosi N et al BSIM-SPICE models enable FinFET and UTB IC designs (IEEE Access, Vol.1, 2013) Figure 11
Farkhani H, Peiravi A, Kargaard JM, Moradi F (2014) In: Comparative study of FinFETs versus 22nm bulk CMOS technologies: SRAM design perspective. IEEE SOCC, Figure 2
Routenberg D Fabrication and characterization of silicon nanowire field effect sensors. PhD Thesis, Yale University, Equation 2.42
Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 1.5.1.3
Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE 479, 17 Nov. 2011, Figure 5a
BSIM-CMG 110.0.0 technical manual, multi-gate MOSFET compact model. EECS, University of California, Berkeley, 2015, Section 3.15.2.2
Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Figure 1.7
Farkhani H, Peiravi A, Kargaard JM, Moradi F (2014) In: Comparative study of FinFETs versus 22nm bulk CMOS technologies: SRAM design perspective. IEEE SOCC, Section II.A
Lapedus M Re-engineering the FinFET. Semiconductor Engineering, Nov. 2014, http://semiengineering.com/re-engineering-the-finfet
Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, p 25
Xiong W (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors, Springer, New York, Section 2.2.3
Pinto R Analog designer, Oracle, personal discussion
Payne D FinFET modeling and extraction at 16-nm. SemiWiki.com, Dec. 2012
Yan RH, Ourmazd A, Lee KF (1992) In: Scaling the Si MOSFET: from bulk to SO1 to bulk. IEEE TRANS. ELECTRON DEVICES, vol. 39, Equation (11)
Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 1.5.1.1
Colinge J-P (2004) Multiple-gate SOI MOSFETs. Solid-State Electronics 48, Equation (9)
Collaert AN (ed) (2013) In: CMOS nanoelectronics: innovative devices, architectures, and applications. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, Table 1.1
Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Table 1.2
Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE, 479, 17 Nov. 2011, Figure 8
Jan C-H et al A 22-nm SOC platform technology featuring 3-D tri-gate and high-k/metal gate. Intel Corporation, Hillsboro
Natarajan S et al (2014) A 14-nm logic technology featuring 2-G FinFET transistors. IEDM, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro
Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE, 479, 17 Nov. 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary
- Analog/RF CMOS
-
As used in this tutorial, it refers to analog circuits (from low- to radio-frequency and even millimeter wave) on a mostly digital CMOS chip. This presents a challenge for the analog designer, since any CMOS fabrication process is optimized for noisy digital logic, not sensitive analog functions such as low-noise amplifiers or wireless transceivers. Digital processes offer simple speed vs. power trade-offs, while analog circuits may need optimizing for gain, linearity, or noise.
- BSIM SPICE models
-
The acronym stands for Berkeley short-channel IGFET (insulated gate) model. Older versions, like BSIM3 and BSIM4, model traditional MOSFETs, up to the 22-nm node. Newer versions like BSIM-CMG model nonplanar devices like the finFET. These models stem from the principles of device physics (like the GCA equations used in this tutorial), rather than purely empirical formulas.
- Carrier concentration
-
In contrast to metallic conductors such as aluminum or copper, semiconductors have two independent charge carriers: electrons and holes. The behavior of diodes, transistors, and other semiconductor devices often hinges upon the relative concentrations of holes (p) and electrons (n), expressed in carriers per cm3. In pure silicon, they are thermally generated in pairs. In this intrinsic state, n and p remain equal. Their product is np = ni2 ≈ 1010 cm−3 at room temperature.
In a p-type substrate, however, the substitution of acceptor atoms (like boron) into the silicon lattice results in an excess of holes. Then pp > > np, indicating an excess of majority-carrier holes over minority-carrier electrons. The product np = ni2 will remain constant under thermal equilibrium (no applied bias or other perturbations).
- CD
-
An acronym familiar to fab engineers, denoting any critical dimension of a feature on a wafer. CDs can be measured in the fab by a CD-SEM. For example, an Intel engineer might plot subthreshold swing as a function of the measured width of a poly line crossing a fin, in nm. This CD is a routine measure of channel length L.
- Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL)
-
When the drain bias of a short-channel device increases from low to saturated values, threshold roll-off is aggravated. (The shaded triangles in Fig. 2.1 indicated how roll-off occurs at low drain bias. DIBL occurs at higher VDS values.) The drain bias affects the potential distribution, lowering barriers to subthreshold conduction. This SCE is measured in mV per volt.
- Inversion
-
In an n-type MOS transistor at the onset of inversion, the concentration of minority electrons flooding into the channel just equals that of holes deep within the p-type substrate. Thus, np(0) = pp(∞), where coordinate 0 refers to the silicon surface. The relative concentration of minority and majority carriers thus becomes inverted. Above this threshold, np(0) rises exponentially with surface potential Φs.
- Permittivity ε0
-
Intuitively, the electrical permittivity ε0 of free space is equal to the capacitance of a cube-shaped parallel-plate capacitor, filled with a vacuum, of 1 cm thickness and 1 cm2 area. A fundamental constant, it equals 8.85 × 10−14 F/cm.
- PTM SPICE models
-
The acronym is for predictive technology model , which evolved from predictive modeling efforts at Berkeley, and is now advanced by the Nanoscale Integration and Modeling Group at the Arizona State University. A goal of this group is predictive modeling, applicable to the next generation of technology—not only finFET devices down to 7 nm but even to future carbon nanotube devices.
- Silicon on insulator (SOI)
-
A promising alternative to bulk finFET technology, in which transistors are fabricated directly on a silicon wafer. In SOI technology, an insulating oxide layer (the buried oxide, or BOX) is implanted below the surface of the entire wafer. FinFET transistors are fabricated into the thin layer of silicon left on top. Due to the BOX, there is little or no parasitic capacitance to the substrate. Another advantage of SOI wafers is that no well is needed around p-type devices. The trade-off is a higher SOI base wafer cost—as much as 4× higher than bulk.
- Subthreshold swing (SS)
-
Subthreshold current is one of the worst SCEs. It makes a short-channel transistor too leaky to turn completely off. Since this current falls off exponentially as VGS drops below VT, it is ordinarily plotted on a log scale. The slope of this log-linear plot is then ∂log(IDS)/∂VGS. In the lab, it is more convenient to measure the reciprocal of this slope, in mV per decade of current, often called subthreshold swing. It has a theoretical minimum of 60 mV/decade—which Intel nearly met with its 22-nm finFET. Devices which swing higher are more leaky.
- Verilog-A
-
An addition to the Verilog digital hardware description language was able to model analog circuits as well. It includes an analog code block, as well as the usual always. Since BSIM-CMG is written in Verilog-A, it can use classic case syntax, like case(GEOMOD), to check a parameter and set values accordingly. It can also use analog operators like ddt(q) to differentiate charge, yielding current.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dančak, C. (2018). The FinFET: A Tutorial. In: Goodnick, S., Korkin, A., Nemanich, R. (eds) Semiconductor Nanotechnology. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91896-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91896-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91895-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91896-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)