Skip to main content

The FinFET: A Tutorial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Nanostructure Science and Technology ((NST))

Abstract

Ever since Intel launched its successful 22-nm Ivy Bridge CPU chip, establishing nonplanar finFET technology as a viable means of extending Moore’s law, variations of the basic finFET or the nanowire transistor have been introduced into nanoelectronics research and manufacturing efforts at an unprecedented rate.

All members of the finFET family of devices—whether fabricated on a bulk or SOI substrate, or structured as a double- or triple-gate or a nanowire transistor—share the same fundamental operating mechanism: the electric field effect. Drain current is under the control of a gate voltage that modulates the conductivity of the underlying fin or nanowire. This tutorial derives qualitative I-V characteristics for such devices, using intuitive assumptions and principles like Ohm’s law and Poisson’s equation.

It then focuses on the geometric characteristics of nonplanar devices, examining the layout of a typical CMOS standard cell comprising both n- and p-type finFETs. The use of a local interconnect layer to connect adjacent fins is detailed. A section is devoted to explaining why nonplanar devices exhibit higher immunity to short-channel effects (SCEs). To quantify this explanation, the natural screening length parameter λ is introduced and then computed for several common device types.

The tutorial cites a dozen intuitive rules of thumb that engineers and scientists may find useful in evaluating finFET design issues and device trade-offs. During the discussion, key electrical and physical finFET properties are related to their corresponding BSIM-CMG SPICE parameters, including GEOMOD and NFIN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38:114

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thackray A (2015) Moore’s law. Basic Books, New York, p 243, 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunga MV, Lin C-H, Niknejad AM, Hu C (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Table 3.1

    Google Scholar 

  4. James D Intel Ivy Bridge unveiled (Chipworks), djames@chipworks.com

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gargini P (Intel Fellow) (2003) In: NanoManufacturing symposium (2003), p 19, from: http://web.mit.edu/nanosymposium/www/Presentations/Gargini2Part1.pdf

  6. Xiong W (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 2.2.6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J (1993) Fundamentals of physics, 4 edn. Wiley, New York, Section 45–4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DM et al (2014) In: Kim DM, Jeong Y-H (eds) Nanowire FETs: principles and applications. Springer, New York, Section 4.1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors, Springer, New York, Section 1.5.2.1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colinge J-P, Greer JC (2016) Nanowire transistors: physics of devices and materials in one dimension. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Equation 2.20

    Google Scholar 

  11. Routenberg D Fabrication and characterization of silicon nanowire field effect sensors. PhD Thesis, Yale University, Section 2.1

    Google Scholar 

  12. US Patent 2017/0133509 A1, FinFET, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (2017) Section [0036]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig Casey H Jr (1999) Devices for integrated circuits. Wiley, New York, Figure 8–6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Craig Casey H Jr (1999) Devices for integrated circuits. Wiley, New York, p 291

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mead C, Conway L (1980) Introduction to VLSI systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Equation (1–1)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Figure 3.8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sze SM (2002) Semiconductor devices: physics and technology, 2 edn. Wiley, Hoboken, Section 6.2.1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, p 74

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paydavosi N et al BSIM-SPICE models enable FinFET and UTB IC designs (IEEE Access, Vol.1, 2013), Equation (1)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chauhan YS et al (2015) FinFET modeling for IC simulation and design: using the BSIM-CMG standard. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Equation 3.12

    Google Scholar 

  21. See for example: Moroz V FinFET structure design & variability analysis enabled by TCAD (EE Times, 8 Oct. 2012) Figure 3

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chauhan YS et al (2015) FinFET modeling for IC simulation and design: using the BSIM-CMG standard. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 71

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paydavosi N et al BSIM-SPICE models enable FinFET and UTB IC designs (IEEE Access, Vol.1, 2013) Figure 11

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farkhani H, Peiravi A, Kargaard JM, Moradi F (2014) In: Comparative study of FinFETs versus 22nm bulk CMOS technologies: SRAM design perspective. IEEE SOCC, Figure 2

    Google Scholar 

  25. Routenberg D Fabrication and characterization of silicon nanowire field effect sensors. PhD Thesis, Yale University, Equation 2.42

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 1.5.1.3

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE 479, 17 Nov. 2011, Figure 5a

    Google Scholar 

  28. BSIM-CMG 110.0.0 technical manual, multi-gate MOSFET compact model. EECS, University of California, Berkeley, 2015, Section 3.15.2.2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pierret R (1990) Field effect devices. Modular series on solid-state devices, vol. IV. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Figure 1.7

    Google Scholar 

  30. Farkhani H, Peiravi A, Kargaard JM, Moradi F (2014) In: Comparative study of FinFETs versus 22nm bulk CMOS technologies: SRAM design perspective. IEEE SOCC, Section II.A

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lapedus M Re-engineering the FinFET. Semiconductor Engineering, Nov. 2014, http://semiengineering.com/re-engineering-the-finfet

  32. Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong W (2008) In: Colinge J-P (ed) FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors, Springer, New York, Section 2.2.3

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pinto R Analog designer, Oracle, personal discussion

    Google Scholar 

  35. Payne D FinFET modeling and extraction at 16-nm. SemiWiki.com, Dec. 2012

  36. Yan RH, Ourmazd A, Lee KF (1992) In: Scaling the Si MOSFET: from bulk to SO1 to bulk. IEEE TRANS. ELECTRON DEVICES, vol. 39, Equation (11)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Section 1.5.1.1

    Google Scholar 

  38. Colinge J-P (2004) Multiple-gate SOI MOSFETs. Solid-State Electronics 48, Equation (9)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Collaert AN (ed) (2013) In: CMOS nanoelectronics: innovative devices, architectures, and applications. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, Table 1.1

    Google Scholar 

  40. Colinge J-P (ed) (2008) In: FinFETs and other multi-gate transistors. Springer, New York, Table 1.2

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE, 479, 17 Nov. 2011, Figure 8

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jan C-H et al A 22-nm SOC platform technology featuring 3-D tri-gate and high-k/metal gate. Intel Corporation, Hillsboro

    Google Scholar 

  43. Natarajan S et al (2014) A 14-nm logic technology featuring 2-G FinFET transistors. IEDM, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ferain I, Colinge CA, Colinge J-P Multigate transistors as the future of classical MOSFETs. NATURE, 479, 17 Nov. 2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Dančak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary

Analog/RF CMOS

As used in this tutorial, it refers to analog circuits (from low- to radio-frequency and even millimeter wave) on a mostly digital CMOS chip. This presents a challenge for the analog designer, since any CMOS fabrication process is optimized for noisy digital logic, not sensitive analog functions such as low-noise amplifiers or wireless transceivers. Digital processes offer simple speed vs. power trade-offs, while analog circuits may need optimizing for gain, linearity, or noise.

BSIM SPICE models

The acronym stands for Berkeley short-channel IGFET (insulated gate) model. Older versions, like BSIM3 and BSIM4, model traditional MOSFETs, up to the 22-nm node. Newer versions like BSIM-CMG model nonplanar devices like the finFET. These models stem from the principles of device physics (like the GCA equations used in this tutorial), rather than purely empirical formulas.

Carrier concentration

In contrast to metallic conductors such as aluminum or copper, semiconductors have two independent charge carriers: electrons and holes. The behavior of diodes, transistors, and other semiconductor devices often hinges upon the relative concentrations of holes (p) and electrons (n), expressed in carriers per cm3. In pure silicon, they are thermally generated in pairs. In this intrinsic state, n and p remain equal. Their product is np = ni2 ≈ 1010 cm−3 at room temperature.

In a p-type substrate, however, the substitution of acceptor atoms (like boron) into the silicon lattice results in an excess of holes. Then pp > > np, indicating an excess of majority-carrier holes over minority-carrier electrons. The product np = ni2 will remain constant under thermal equilibrium (no applied bias or other perturbations).

CD

An acronym familiar to fab engineers, denoting any critical dimension of a feature on a wafer. CDs can be measured in the fab by a CD-SEM. For example, an Intel engineer might plot subthreshold swing as a function of the measured width of a poly line crossing a fin, in nm. This CD is a routine measure of channel length L.

Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL)

When the drain bias of a short-channel device increases from low to saturated values, threshold roll-off is aggravated. (The shaded triangles in Fig. 2.1 indicated how roll-off occurs at low drain bias. DIBL occurs at higher VDS values.) The drain bias affects the potential distribution, lowering barriers to subthreshold conduction. This SCE is measured in mV per volt.

Inversion

In an n-type MOS transistor at the onset of inversion, the concentration of minority electrons flooding into the channel just equals that of holes deep within the p-type substrate. Thus, np(0) = pp(∞), where coordinate 0 refers to the silicon surface. The relative concentration of minority and majority carriers thus becomes inverted. Above this threshold, np(0) rises exponentially with surface potential Φs.

Permittivity ε0

Intuitively, the electrical permittivity ε0 of free space is equal to the capacitance of a cube-shaped parallel-plate capacitor, filled with a vacuum, of 1 cm thickness and 1 cm2 area. A fundamental constant, it equals 8.85 × 10−14 F/cm.

PTM SPICE models

The acronym is for predictive technology model , which evolved from predictive modeling efforts at Berkeley, and is now advanced by the Nanoscale Integration and Modeling Group at the Arizona State University. A goal of this group is predictive modeling, applicable to the next generation of technology—not only finFET devices down to 7 nm but even to future carbon nanotube devices.

Silicon on insulator (SOI)

A promising alternative to bulk finFET technology, in which transistors are fabricated directly on a silicon wafer. In SOI technology, an insulating oxide layer (the buried oxide, or BOX) is implanted below the surface of the entire wafer. FinFET transistors are fabricated into the thin layer of silicon left on top. Due to the BOX, there is little or no parasitic capacitance to the substrate. Another advantage of SOI wafers is that no well is needed around p-type devices. The trade-off is a higher SOI base wafer cost—as much as 4× higher than bulk.

Subthreshold swing (SS)

Subthreshold current is one of the worst SCEs. It makes a short-channel transistor too leaky to turn completely off. Since this current falls off exponentially as VGS drops below VT, it is ordinarily plotted on a log scale. The slope of this log-linear plot is then ∂log(IDS)/∂VGS. In the lab, it is more convenient to measure the reciprocal of this slope, in mV per decade of current, often called subthreshold swing. It has a theoretical minimum of 60 mV/decade—which Intel nearly met with its 22-nm finFET. Devices which swing higher are more leaky.

Verilog-A

An addition to the Verilog digital hardware description language was able to model analog circuits as well. It includes an analog code block, as well as the usual always. Since BSIM-CMG is written in Verilog-A, it can use classic case syntax, like case(GEOMOD), to check a parameter and set values accordingly. It can also use analog operators like ddt(q) to differentiate charge, yielding current.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dančak, C. (2018). The FinFET: A Tutorial. In: Goodnick, S., Korkin, A., Nemanich, R. (eds) Semiconductor Nanotechnology. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91896-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics