Skip to main content

In Revision: Theoretical Frameworks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Music Business and Digital Impacts

Part of the book series: Music Business Research ((MUBURE))

  • 2091 Accesses

Abstract

A central ambition in the first section is to establish an understanding of the music industries—the field of study—as well as change—the different dynamics within and around the music industries. I consider the latter understanding to be dependent on the former—that if we don’t have a proper concept of the field of study, then it becomes difficult to define and assess the changes happening to it. The music industries have indeed been impacted by digital change and innovation. It has become a reference point for the difficulties some industries have faced, adapting to a new digital economy. However, many of the accounts on the music industries’ difficult digital transitions tend to diminish complex issues to mere dichotomies. Furthermore, the debates around the digital changes we face, offer competing theoretical approaches, with competing theoretical disciplines providing opposing propositions on how to understand the music industries, and subsequently the changes and difficulties they’re experiencing. Therefore, this first part of the book will be used to describe and critically discuss influential contributions to academic and public debates on the music industries’ digital transition.

Beyond looking at change, the chapter will also start discussing continuity, building on scholars such as Keith Negus and David Hesmondhalgh and arguing that albeit significant change has followed digitalization, there are important continuities that seem to be neglected. Recognizing such continuities will undoubtedly provide better and more accurate discussions around the music industries and digitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.iaspm.net/ (last visited 04.12.2016).

  2. 2.

    http://www.imbra.eu/index.html#home (last visited 04.12.2016).

  3. 3.

    Since my data has been collected annually and continually as the Kristiansand Roundtable Conferences have been conducted, it has been possible for me to assess the data gradually and therefore adjust my approach and focus during my work.

  4. 4.

    http://thefac.org/fran-healy-speaks-out-in-parliament-2/ (last visited 01.02.2014).

  5. 5.

    The article is the written version of Peter S. Menell’s presentation at the 42nd Annual Brace Lecture at the American Copyright Society.

  6. 6.

    See, for example, the class-action lawsuits in the US on Spotify’s alleged failure to license, here: http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/7416484/say-you-want-a-revolution-us-copyright-office-clears-path-for-digital and here: http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/legal-and-management/7125489/between-rock-and-a-database-the-streaming-services

  7. 7.

    http://www.ifpi.org/about.php (last entered the 1.11.2016).

  8. 8.

    http://www.riaa.com/about-riaa/ (last entered the 1.11.2016).

  9. 9.

    Some would perhaps argue that the “digital revolution” is just that; a rare paradigm shift that alters everything. However, Fligstein and McAdam refer to these macro events as more extreme, altering multiple SAFs, and as a result destabilizing society as a whole.

  10. 10.

    Going back in time, publishing and sheet music was the centre of the music industries.

  11. 11.

    The Big Six refers to the six multinational corporations Time Warner, Sony, Philips, Bertelsman, Thorn-EMI and Matsushita, which in 1994 accounted for more than 90% the worldwide sales of music (Burnett 1996: 2).

  12. 12.

    Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicator database (Hesmondhalgh 2013: 326).

  13. 13.

    See COST-action Dynamics of Virtual Work: http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/isch/IS1202 dedicated to a critical assessment of the effects digitalization has had on labor framework conditions.

  14. 14.

    The Norwegian report of our work can be found here: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/rapport-fra-nordgard-utvalget/id734716/

  15. 15.

    There are challenges with these numbers, as there are different ways to count a nation’s local share, depending on definitions and depending on where you count (artists, labels, collecting societies). Although my findings on the Norwegian market correlate well with other findings, there are opposing views on this development among some music industry stakeholders.

  16. 16.

    I am deliberately omitting allegations of unfair conduct, black-box monies and breakages, due to a lack of research and data on this. These concerns were nevertheless subject to discussion in The Nordgård Committee (2013), and later in a committee initiated by the Norwegian Musicians Union (Musikernes Fellesorganisasjon) (Nordgård 2014).

  17. 17.

    http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/65917/billboard-bows-ringtones-chart (last visited 27.11.2016).

  18. 18.

    http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/62750/crazy-frog-outpaces-coldplay-in-uk (last visited 27.11.2016).

References

  • Adorno, T. (1991). The culture industry. In J. Bernstein (Ed.), Selected essays on mass culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2012). The culture industry reconsidered. In B. Moeran & A. Alacovska (Eds.), Creative industries: Critical readings. London: Berg. The essay was first published in T. Adorno, Ohne Leitbild, Franfurt am Main, (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, K., & Dahl, C. (2003). Upplevelsesindustrin 2003, statistic och jämförelser. Stockholm: Swedish Knowledge Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, H., & Throsby, D. (2012). New technologies in cultural institutions: Theory, evidence and policy implications. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B., & Harvey, E. (2015). Recording industries, technologies and cultures in flux. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 103–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., & Bowens, W. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard business review on reinventing your business model, 2011, 201–230. Originally in Harvard Business Review 73 (1, January–February 1995), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, B. (2014). Streaming debate: Billy Bragg’s response to Byrne’s ‘how will the wolf survive…’ Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.musictank.co.uk/blog/billy-bragg-on-streaming-debate

  • Burkart, P. (2014). Music in the cloud and the digital sublime. Popular Music and Society, 37(4), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. (1996). The global jukebox: The international music industry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2014). How will the wolf survive: Can musicians make a living in the streaming era? Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://davidbyrne.com/how-will-the-wolf-survive-can-musicians-make-a-living-in-the-streaming-era

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society (Volume 1 of The information age). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2008). Communication power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, S., & Garofalo, R. (1977). Rock’n’ roll is here to pay: The history and politics of the music industry. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolly, M., & Kreuger, A. B. (2005). Rockonomics: The economics of popular music (NBER Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. D. (2012). From cultural to creative industries: Theory, industry and policy implications. In B. Moeran & A. Alacovska (Eds.), Creative industries: Critical readings. New York, NY: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCMS, Department for Culture, Media & Sports. (2001). Creative industries mapping documents. Retrieved October 15, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-2001

  • Dredge, S. (2013, October 17). Thom Yorke calls spotify the last desperate fart of a dying corpse. The Guardian. Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/07/spotify-thom-yorke-dying-corpse

  • Drew, R. (2014). New technologies and the business of music: Lessons from the 1980s home taping hearings. Popular Music and Society, 37(3), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A. (2013). Blockbusters: Hit-making, risk-taking, and the big business of entertainment. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engström, A., & Hallencreutz, D. (2003). Från A-dur till bokslut – Hårda fakta om em mjuk industri. Hultsfred: IUC Musik & Upplevelseindustri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (2001). The popular music industry. In S. Frith, W. Straw, & J. Street (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to pop and rock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (2007). Live music matters. Scottish Music Review, Volume 1: Indeterminacy and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S., & Marshall, L. (2004). Music and copyright. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadida, A. L., & Paris, T. (2014). Managerial cognition and the value chain in the digital music industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 83, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, R. (2016). The fallacy of composition and disruption in the music industry. In P. Wikström & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Business innovation and disruptions in the music industries. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, C. (2006). Plain destruction or creative destruction? Copyright erosion and the evolution of the record industry. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 3(2), 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, C. (2012). Digital copying and the supply for sound recordings. Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (2008). Gridlock economy. How too much ownership wrecks markets, stops innovation and costs lives. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2006). Bordieu, the media and cultural production. Media, Culture & Society, 28(2), 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The cultural industries. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M. (1990). Processing fads and fashion: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems’. In S. Frith & A. Goodwin (Eds.), On record: Rock, pop and the written word. Originally published in (1972) American Journal of Sociology, 77 (University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture – Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., et al. (2008, December). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review on Reinventing Your Business Model, 2011, 39–65. Originally in Harvard Business Review, 86(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopper, S. (2009). Appetite for self-destruction: The spectacular crash of the record industry in the digital age. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. (2005). The economics of real superstars: The market for rock concerts in the material world. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (2011). Free ride: How digital parasites are destroying the culture business, and how the culture business can fight back. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, A. (2001). Time–space (and digital) compression: Software formats, musical networks, and the reorganisation of the music industry. Environment and Planning, 32, 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. (2006, April). File-sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction. Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasø, A. (2014). User-centric settlement for music streaming. Presented at South by Southwest. Retrieved from http://www.hf.uio.no/imv/forskning/prosjekter/skyogscene/publikasjoner/usercentric-cloudsandconcerts-report.pdf

  • Marshall, L. (2016). Let’s keep music special. F-Spotify: On-demand streaming and the controversy over artist royalties. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W., & Pickard, V. (2011). Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, P., & Kirov, V. (Eds.). (2017). Policy implications of virtual work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menell, P. S. (2013). This American copyright life: Reflections on re-equilibrating copyright for the internet age (Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2347674).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoro-Pons, J. D., & Garcia, C. M. (2011). Live and pre-recorded popular music consumption. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35, 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoro-Pons, J. D., et al. (2012). The effect of copyright infringement on the consumption of cultural goods (Working Paper presented at the 2012 Annual conference of the Spanish Association of Law and Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, F. (2013). The disruptive nature of digitization: The case of the recorded music industry. International Journal of Arts Management, 15(2), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. W. (2014). Artists as entrepreneurs, fans as workers. Popular Music and Society, 37(3), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, M. (2014). The death of the long tail: The superstar music economy (MiDIA Research). Retrieved June 6, 2015, from http://www.promus.dk/files/MIDiA_Consulting_-_The_Death_of_the_Long_Tail.pdf

  • Murdock, G., & Golding, P. (2004). Dismantling the digital divide: Rethinking the dynamics of participation and exclusion. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Towards a political economy of culture (pp. 286–306). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1992). Producing POP: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1996). Popular music in theory: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1998, July 1). Cultural production and the corporation: Musical genres and the strategic management of creativity in the US recording industry. Media, Culture & Society, 20(3), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1999). Music genres and corporate cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgård, D. (2013). Rapport fra Nordgård-utvalget. The Norwegian Ministry of Culture. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kud/documents/reports-and-plans/reports/2013/rapport-fra-nordgard-utvalget.html?id=734716

  • Nordgård, D. (2014). Rapport fra Musikernes fellesorganisasjons utvalg på strømming. Musikernes fellesorganisasjon. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://www.musikerorg.no/text.cfm/0_1915/rapport-fra-mfos-strxmmeutvalg

  • Nordgård, D. (2016a). Norwegian festivals and a music economy in transition: The art of balancing ambitions, expectations and limitations. In C. Newbold & J. Jordan (Eds.), Focus on world festivals. Oxford: Goodfellow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgård, D. (2016b). Lessons from the world’s most advanced market for music streaming services. In P. Wikström & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Business innovation and disruption in the music industry. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgård, D. (2017). Assessing music streaming and industry disruptions. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.), Policy implications of virtual work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Strumpf, K. (2007, February). The effect of file-sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 115(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Strumpf, K. (2009). File-sharing and copyright. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), NBER’s innovation policy and the economy series (Vol. 10). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, W., & Carey, C. (2011). Wallet share. Economic Insight, 22, PRS for Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, W., & Garland, E. (2009). The long tail of P2P. Economic Insight, 14. PRS for Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, R. R. (2014). Music streaming in Denmark: An analysis of listening patterns and the consequences of a user settlement model based on streaming data from WiMP. Retrieved February 12, 2015, from http://rucforsk.ruc.dk/site/da/publications/music-streaming-in-denmark%28d553b4dc-4e68-4809-a4ba-67da99a2122a%29.html

  • Pollstar. (2010). Year-end special edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodhouse, S. (2006). The creative industries: Definitions, quantification and practice. In C. Eisenberg, R. Gerlach, & C. Handke (Eds.), Cultural industries: The British experience in international perspective. Berlin: Humboldt University Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2012). Cultural entrepreneurs, cultural entrepreneurship: Music producers mobilising and converting bourdieu’s alternative capitals. Poetics, 40(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications and the public interest (pp. 37–72). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilker, H. S. (2012). The networked studio revisited: Becoming an artist in the age of piracy cultures. International Journal of Communication, 6, 773–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, H. (2016). Back in black: Rethinking core competencies of the recorded music industry. In P. Wikström & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Business innovation and disruptions in the music industries. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (1997). The monopolies and mergers commission’s investigation of the U.K. music market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (2004). Copyright and Economics. In S. Frith & L. Marshall (Eds.), Music and copyright. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschmuck, P. (2015). Music streaming revisited – The international streaming market 2014. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from www.musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2015/06/30/music-streaming-revisited% the-international-music-streaming-market-2014/#more-2258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschmuck, P. (2016). From record selling to cultural entrepreneurship: The music economy in the digital paradigm shift. In P. Wikström & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Business innovation and disruptions in the Music Industries. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turow, J. (1991). A mass communication perspective on entertainment industries. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (2011). Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie: The supply of new recorded music since Napster (NBER Working Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P. (2009). The music industry: Music in the cloud. In Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nordgård, D. (2018). In Revision: Theoretical Frameworks. In: The Music Business and Digital Impacts. Music Business Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91887-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics