Abstract
Although the public is led to believe in the foregone conclusion that what is called mental illness is biological and genetic in nature and that medical advancements have led to new discoveries and improved treatments, this is not actually so certain. The field of trauma studies has continued to expand and the findings consistently support instinctual wisdom: people go mad, become aggressive, and are fearful because they have been profoundly hurt. The subject matter of this book is an exploration of the system as a whole, and what people have found to be helpful, both in and out of the system, when recovering from childhood adversity. It is entirely driven by a first-person perspective of those with extensive experiences in the system, including the author. This chapter provides an overview of both the book and the study upon which it is based.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The World Health Organization has done a series of studies beginning in the 1970s evaluating outcomes for “schizophrenia ” across countries. They have consistently found that poorer countries (i.e., those countries that have different cultural approaches to emotional distress and rarely react to such conditions with medical interventions) have better outcomes and higher proportions of recovery than richer, more modernized countries (see Jaaskelainen et al., 2013). Yet, in those countries that have since adopted a Western, biomedical approach to emotional distress, the disparity in outcomes has almost disappeared and a poor outcome is now the norm (Karagianis et al., 2009; Whitaker, 2010). See also E. Watters’ (2010) Crazy Like Us, which documents how the Western view of emotional distress has co-opted other cultures’ frameworks for understanding and dealing with such issues, at times, to their detriment.
- 2.
As may already be clear at this point, I do not believe that diagnoses are valid representations of a true construct, nor do I believe that they are ethical to use considering their established lack of validity or reliability (Chap. 4). Therefore, the study conducted did not evaluate for differential diagnosis or comorbidity, but rather for endorsement of specific phenomena including: feeling like more than one person, extensive memory problems, incidents of possession, and severe depersonalization and derealization.
- 3.
For those interested in the methodological process and the nuances therein can find a copy of the dissertation, entitled “Whose treatment is this anyway? Helpful and harmful aspects of treatment for dissociative identity disorder phenomena?” on ProQuest or contact the author directly. What is outlined here is a brief overview geared for the general public who tend to not have a strong understanding of or interest in various quantitative or qualitative methodological procedures. The methods section of the dissertation is almost 30 pages and explains in great detail how participants were selected, how the coding procedure worked, how repeated ideas and themes were developed, the logic behind the use of mixed methods qualitative analysis, and acknowledgment of researcher bias (and the procedures taken to reduce this as best possible).
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Bassman, R. (2001). Whose reality is it anyway? Consumers/survivors/ex-patients can speak for themselves. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(4), 11–35.
Bentall, R. P., Wickham, S., Shevlin, M., & Varese, F. (2012). Do specific early-life adversities lead to specific symptoms of psychosis? A study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38, 734–740.
Boevink, W. (2012). Towards recovery, empowerment and experiential expertise of users of psychiatric services. In P. Ryan, S. Ramon, & T. Greacen (Eds.), Empowerment, lifelong learning and recovery in mental health: Towards a new paradigm. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2013/2011). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC (producer). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
Cohen, O. (2005). How do we recover? An analysis of psychiatric survivor oral histories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 45(3), 333–354.
Coons, P. M., & Bowman, E. A. S. (2001). Ten-year follow-up study of patients with dissociative identity disorder. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2(1), 73–89.
de Wet, A., Swartz, L., & Chiliza, B. (2015). Hearing their voices: The lived experience of recovery from first-episode psychosis in schizophrenia in South Africa. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 61(1), 27–32.
Dillon, J. (2013, March). Just saying it as it is: Names matter; Language matters; Truth matters. Clinical Psychology Forum No. 243: British Psychological Society.
Druss, B. G. (2006). Rising mental health costs: What are we getting for our money? Health Affairs, 25(3), 614–622.
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., … Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 14(4), 245–258.
Geekie, J., & Read, J. (2009). Making sense of madness. New York: Routledge.
Hjorthoj, C. R., Madsen, T., Agerbo, E., & Nordentoft, M. (2014). Risk of suicide according to level of psychiatric treatment: A nationwide nested case-control study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1357–1365.
Jaaskelainen, E., Juola, P., Hirvonen, N., McGrath, J. J., Saha, S., Isohanni, M., … Miettunen, J. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(6), 1296–1306.
Janssen, I., Krabbendam, L., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Vollebergh, W., De Graff, R., & van Os, J. (2004). Childhood abuse as a risk factor for psychotic experiences. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 38–45.
Karagianis, J., Novick, D., Pecenak, J., Haro, J. M., Dossenbach, M., Treuer, T., … Lowry, A. J. (2009). Worldwide-schizophrenia outpatient health outcomes (W-SOHO): Baseline characteristics of pan-regional observational data from more than 17,000 patients. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63(11), 1578–1588.
Large, M., & Ryan, C. J. (2014). Disturbing findings about the risk of suicide and psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(9), 1353–1355.
Mead, S., & Copeland, M. E. (2000). What recovery means to us: Consumers’ perspectives. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(3), 315–328.
Mehl-Madrona, L., Jul, E., & Mainguy, B. (2014). Results of a transpersonal, narrative, and phenomenological psychotherapy for psychosis. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 33(1), 57–76.
Milligan, D., McCarthy-Jones, S., Winthrop, A., & Dudley, R. (2013). Time changes everything? A qualitative investigation of the experience of auditory verbal hallucinations over time. Psychosis, 5(2), 107–118.
Morrison, A. P. (2001). The interpretation of intrusions in psychosis: An integrative cognitive approach to psychotic symptoms. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 257–276.
Mueser, K. T., Lu, W., Rosenberge, S. D., & Wolfe, R. (2010). The trauma of psychosis: Posttraumatic stress disorder and recent onset psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 116, 217–227.
Ng, R. M., Pearson, V., Chen, E. E. Y., & Law, C. W. (2011). What does recovery from schizophrenia mean? Perceptions of medical students and trainee psychiatrists. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57(3), 248–262.
Parks, S. E., Johnson, L. L., McDaniel, D. D., & Gladden, M. (2010). Surveillance for violent deaths – National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 states. MMWR 2014, 63(ss01), 1–33 Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6301a1.htm
Randal, P., Stewart, M. W., Proverbs, D., Lampshire, D., Symes, J., & Hamer, H. (2009). “The re-covery model” – An integrative developmental stress-vulnerability-strengths approach to mental health. Psychosis, 1(2), 122–133.
Read, J. (1997). Child abuse and psychosis: A literature review and implications for professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(5), 448–456.
Read, J., Haslam, N., Sayce, L., & Davies, E. (2006). Prejudice and schizophrenia: A revew of the ‘mental illness is an illness like any other’ approach. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114(5), 303–318.
Read, J., van Os, J., Morrison, A. P., & Ross, C. A. (2005). Childhood trauma, psychosis, and schizophrenia: A literature review with theoretical and clinical implications. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112, 330–350.
Walsh, J., Hochbrueckner, R., Corcoran, J., & Spence, R. (2016). The lived experience of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Social Work in Mental Health, 14(6), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2015.1100153
Watters, E. (2010). Crazy like us. New York: Free Press.
Whitaker, R. (2010, May). A schizophrenia mystery solved?. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mad-in-america/201005/schizophrenia-mystery-solved
Williams, P. (2012). Rethinking madness: Towards a paradigm shift in our understanding and treatment of psychosis. San Rafael, CA: Sky’s Edge Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter, N. (2018). Introduction: Containing Multitudes. In: Trauma and Madness in Mental Health Services. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91752-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91752-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91751-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91752-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)