Advertisement

Model Consolidation: A Process Modelling Method Combining Process Mining and Business Process Modelling

  • Ornela ÇelaEmail author
  • Agnès Front
  • Dominique Rieu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 318)

Abstract

Analysing the current state of a process is a crucial step when improving the process. Four elements are defined during the process analysis: the objective, the process model, the indicators and the blocking points. It is important to well-define all of them when characterizing a process state, however the process model has a more fundamental influence. This model provides a map upon which is done the analysis of the process state, prediction of its evolution and simulation of the impact of the change to be undertaken for improving the process.

In this work we are proposing a strategy for the model consolidation, that combines the process discovery and business process modeling approach. This strategy aims to merge the models derived by these existing approaches in one unique model that is complete, comprehensive, aligned to the reality and useful for in-depth analysis.

This article describes the model consolidation strategy by detailing the steps to be taken and illustrating its usage into a real-life process provided from our industrial collaborator Net Invaders [19].

Keywords

Process analysis Business process modelling and process mining 

References

  1. 1.
    Çela, O., Front, A., Rieu, D.: CEFOP: a method for the continual evolution of organisational processes. In: 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Front, A., Rieu, D., Cela, O., Movahedian, F.: Les méthodes d’évolution continue au sein des organisations: le cadre As-Is/As-If. In: INFORSID (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: What makes a good process model? Softw. Syst. Model 11(4), 557–569 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rittgen, P.: End-user involvement and team factors in business process modeling. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawai, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buur, J., Ankenbrand, B., Mitchell, R.: Participatory business modelling. CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts 9(1), 55–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, R., Recker, J., West, S.: Using virtual worlds for collaborative business process modeling. Bus. Process Manag. J. 17(3), 546–564 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ribeiro, C., Fernandes, J., Lourenço, A., Borbinha, J., Pereira, J.: Using serious games to teach business process modelling and simulation. In: International Conference of Modelling, Simulation and Visualisation Methods, Las Vegas, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Front, A., Rieu, D., Santorum, M., Movahedian, F.: A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Softw. Syst. Model., 1–24 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herzberg, N., Kunze, M.: The business process game. In: 7th Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Eck, M.L., Lu, X., Leemans, S.J.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: PM2: a process mining project methodology. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 297–313. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining: discovering and improving Spaghetti and Lasagna processes. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DISCO tool Homepage. https://fluxicon.com/products/
  14. 14.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: What kind of data does process mining require? http://www.processmining.org/logs/start
  15. 15.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tax, N., Sidorova, N., Haakma, R., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Event abstraction for process mining using supervised learning techniques. In: Bi, Y., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) IntelliSys 2016. LNNS, vol. 15, pp. 251–269. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56994-9_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mannhardt, F., Tax, N., Unsupervised event abstraction using pattern abstraction and local process models. In: Enabling Business Transformation by Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support Working Conference-BPMDS (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Net Invaders company homepage. https://en.net-invaders.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIGGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations