Model Consolidation: A Process Modelling Method Combining Process Mining and Business Process Modelling
Analysing the current state of a process is a crucial step when improving the process. Four elements are defined during the process analysis: the objective, the process model, the indicators and the blocking points. It is important to well-define all of them when characterizing a process state, however the process model has a more fundamental influence. This model provides a map upon which is done the analysis of the process state, prediction of its evolution and simulation of the impact of the change to be undertaken for improving the process.
In this work we are proposing a strategy for the model consolidation, that combines the process discovery and business process modeling approach. This strategy aims to merge the models derived by these existing approaches in one unique model that is complete, comprehensive, aligned to the reality and useful for in-depth analysis.
This article describes the model consolidation strategy by detailing the steps to be taken and illustrating its usage into a real-life process provided from our industrial collaborator Net Invaders .
KeywordsProcess analysis Business process modelling and process mining
- 1.Çela, O., Front, A., Rieu, D.: CEFOP: a method for the continual evolution of organisational processes. In: 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) (2017)Google Scholar
- 2.Front, A., Rieu, D., Cela, O., Movahedian, F.: Les méthodes d’évolution continue au sein des organisations: le cadre As-Is/As-If. In: INFORSID (2017)Google Scholar
- 5.Rittgen, P.: End-user involvement and team factors in business process modeling. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawai, USA (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Ribeiro, C., Fernandes, J., Lourenço, A., Borbinha, J., Pereira, J.: Using serious games to teach business process modelling and simulation. In: International Conference of Modelling, Simulation and Visualisation Methods, Las Vegas, USA (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.Front, A., Rieu, D., Santorum, M., Movahedian, F.: A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Softw. Syst. Model., 1–24 (2017)Google Scholar
- 10.Herzberg, N., Kunze, M.: The business process game. In: 7th Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition (2015)Google Scholar
- 12.Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining: discovering and improving Spaghetti and Lasagna processes. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (2011)Google Scholar
- 13.DISCO tool Homepage. https://fluxicon.com/products/
- 14.van der Aalst, W.M.P.: What kind of data does process mining require? http://www.processmining.org/logs/start
- 16.Tax, N., Sidorova, N., Haakma, R., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Event abstraction for process mining using supervised learning techniques. In: Bi, Y., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) IntelliSys 2016. LNNS, vol. 15, pp. 251–269. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56994-9_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mannhardt, F., Tax, N., Unsupervised event abstraction using pattern abstraction and local process models. In: Enabling Business Transformation by Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support Working Conference-BPMDS (2017)Google Scholar
- 18.Pro-M tool Homepage. http://www.promtools.org/doku.php
- 19.Net Invaders company homepage. https://en.net-invaders.com/