Advertisement

Modeling Organizational Structures in the Realm of Enterprise Modeling: Limitations of the Current Paradigm and Prospects of Multilevel Language Architectures

  • Sybren de KinderenEmail author
  • Monika Kaczmarek-Heß
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 318)

Abstract

Given the notable role that organizational structures play in different analyses, modeling constructs for organizational structures are present in a number of enterprise modeling approaches. In this paper, we point out limitations of modeling approaches for expressing organizational structure, especially with regards to (1) expressing domain characteristics, and (2) suitability of current modeling approaches for addressing typical analysis questions. As a response, we discuss how a promising novel modeling paradigm, called multilevel modeling, can be used to address these limitations. We use the organizational structure of universities as a case scenario.

Keywords

Multilevel modeling Organizational structure modeling FMMLx 

References

  1. 1.
    Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. SoSyM 13(3), 941–962 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frank, U.: MEMO Organisation Modelling Language (1): Focus on Organisational Structure. ICB-Research Report 48, University of Duisburg-Essen (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daft, R.: Organization Theory and Design. SWC-General Business Series. South-Western College Publishing, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Open Group: ArchiMate 2.1 Specification: Open Group Standard. The Open Group Series. Van Haren, Zaltbommel (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scheer, A.W.: ARIS - Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    SoftwareAG: Aris method manual v. 10 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sandkuhl, K., Wißotzki, M., Stirna, J.: Unternehmensmodellierung: Grundlagen, Methode und Praktiken. Springer Vieweg, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. SoSym 13(3), 941–962 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A.: A semantic foundation for organizational structures: a multi-level approach. In: 2015 IEEE 19th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 50–59, September 2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frank, U.: Multilevel modeling - toward a new paradigm of conceptual modeling and information systems design. BISE 6(6), 319–337 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mintzberg, H.: The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Theory of Management Policy Series. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fayol, H.: General and Industrial Management. Pitman Paperbacks, Pitman (1949)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Linden, D., Hoppenbrouwers, S.: Challenges of identifying communities with shared semantics in enterprise modeling. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 160–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34549-4_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frank, U.: The MEMO Meta modeling Language (MML) and Language Architecture. 2nd (edn.), ICB-Research Report 43. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaczmarek-Heß, M., de Kinderen, S.: A multilevel model of IT platforms for the needs of enterprise IT landscape analyses. BISE (5) (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frank, U.: Designing models and systems to support it management: a case for multilevel modeling. In: Atkinson, C., Grossmann, G., Clark, T., (eds.) MULTI@MoDELS, pp. 3–24 (2016). ceur-ws.org
  18. 18.
    Gustafsson, P., Höök, D., Franke, U., Johnson, P.: Modeling the it impact on organizational structure. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, EDOC 2009, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 12–21. IEEE Press (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pereira, D., Almeida, J.P.A.: Representing organizational structures in an enterprise architecture language. In: 6th Workshop on Formal Ontologies meet Industry (FOMI 2014), pp. 1–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santos, P.S., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: An ontology-based analysis and semantics for organizational structure modeling in the ARIS method. Inf. Syst. 38(5), 690–708 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frank, U.: Some guidelines for the conception of domain-specific modelling languages. In: Nttgens, M., Thomas, O., Weber, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference ‘Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures’ (EMISA 2011). Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol. P-190, Bonn, Germany, GI, pp. 93–106 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. SoSyM 7(3), 345–359 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45441-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Lara, J., Guerra, E., Cuadrado, J.S.: When and how to use multilevel modelling. ACM TOSEM 24(2), 12:1–12:46 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neumayr, B., Grün, K., Schrefl, M.: Multi-level domain modeling with m-objects and m-relationships. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australian Computer Society, pp. 107–116 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clark, T., Sammut, P., Willans, J.: Applied Metamodelling: A Foundation for Language Driven Development. Ceteva, Sheffield (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clark, T., Willans, J.: Software language engineering with XMF and XModeler. In: Mernik, M. (ed.) Formal and Practical Aspects of Domain-specific Languages: Recent Developments, pp. 311–340. IGI Global (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frank, U.: Delegation: an important concept for the appropriate design of object models. J. Object-Oriented Program. 13(3), 13–18 (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A.: Toward a well-founded theory for multi-level conceptual modeling. SoSyM 17(1), 1–27 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: A unified foundational ontology and some applications of it in business modeling. In: CAiSE 2004 Workshops in Connection with the 16th CaISE Conference, Riga, Latvia, 7–11 June 2004, pp. 129–143. CEUR-WS (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations