Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Doctorate of Nursing Practice: A Conduit for Scholarship in the Realm of Advanced Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Scholarship, a Career Legacy Map and Advanced Practice

Part of the book series: Advanced Practice in Nursing ((APN))

  • 407 Accesses

Abstract

The doctorate of nursing practice has been referred to as a pipeline with varying educational parameters that will either expand or constrict the flow of nurses through the advanced practice nursing pathway. There is also a concern expressed that the reduction in the number of nurses graduating with a PhD will impact on the discipline of nursing. If scholarship is at the heart of what a profession is, then clinical scholarship must be central to the nursing discipline (Boyer, Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990). The discipline’s philosophy, theory and practice are intertwined and as reflected in Boyer’s ideas, scholarship in nursing can come from four scholarly activities: discovery, integration, application, and teaching. The evolution context from first to second to third generation professional doctorate is explored. Further, advanced practice nursing practitioners need to communicate the distinctiveness of their scholarship and contributions to the public with greater clarity and emphatic certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander S. Scholarship in clinical practice: an update on recommendations for doctor of nursing practice programs. Clin Nurse Spec. 2016;30:58–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.000000000177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Position statement on defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. 1999. Accessed from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/defining-scholarship.

  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing. AACN position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. 2004. Accessed from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPpositionstatement.pdf.

  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. 2006. Accessed from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/pdf/essentials.pdf.

  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The doctor of nursing practice: current issues and clarifying recommendations report from the task force on the implementation of the DNP. 2015. Accessed from https://www.pncb.org/sites/default/files/2017.../AACN_DNP_Recommendations.pdf.

  • American Nurses Association. Nursing: scope and standards of practice. 2nd ed. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association; 2010. Accessed from https://www.nursesbooks.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin A, McDaniels M. Impact on doctoral and professional education. In: Moser D, Todd R, Braxton J, Associates, editors. Scholarship reconsidered. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2016. p. 31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council. Nurse practitioner accreditation standards 2015. Canberra, ACT: ANMAC; 2015. Accessed from https://www.anmac.org.au/accreditation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkham M, Stiles W, Lamber TM, Mellor-Clark J. Building a rigorous and relevant knowledge base for the psychological therapies. In: Barkham M, Hardy G, Mellor-Clark J, editors. Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: a guide for the psychological therapies. Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex; 2010. p. 21–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann S. The struggle for nursing’s rightful place. Nurs Sci Q. 2010;23:248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum R. Management fads in higher education: where they come from, what they do and why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourner T, Bowden R, Lang S. Professional doctorates in England. Stud High Educ. 2001;24:75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer E. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M. Education doctorates: reconstructing professional partnerships around research. Aust Univers Rev. 1995;38:20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D. The disciplines and discipline of educational research. J Phil Educ. 2006;40:259–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Crabtree K. The development of practice scholarship in DNP programs: a paradigm shift. J Prof Nurs. 2013;29:330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant-Lukosius D, Carter N, Reid K, Donald F, Martin-Misener R, Kilpatrick K, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical nurse specialist-led hospital to home transitional care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:763–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter E, Mastro K, Vose C, Rivera R, Larson E. Clarifying the conundrum: evidence-based practice, quality improvement or research? The clinical scholarship continuum. J Nurs Adm. 2017;47:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin A, Casey M, Fairbrother G, Graham I, Irvine L, McCormack B, Thoms D. Third-generation professional doctorates in nursing: the move to clarity in learning product differentiation. Int Pract Dev J. 2017;7:4. https://doi.org/10.19043/pdj.72.004.

  • Clearly M, Hunt G, Jackson D. Demystifying PhDs: a review of doctorate programs designed to fulfil the needs of the next generation of nursing professionals. Contemp Nurse. 2011;39:273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronenwett L, Dracup K, Grey M, McCauley L, Meleis A, Salmon M. The doctor of nursing practice: a national workforce perspective. Nurs Outlook. 2011;59(1):9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis K, Fry M, Shaban R, Considine J. Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2016;26:862–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher-Hacker E, Diegel-Vacek L, Piano M. Letter to the editor: Is it time to re-examine the pipeline for advanced nursing practice? Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:386–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deatrick J. Creating a pipeline for tomorrow’s nurse researchers. Res Nurs Health. 2011;34:171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (DoH). Developing a policy for graduate, specialist and advanced nursing & midwifery practice consultation paper. Dublin: Department of Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesHarnais S. The outcome model of quality. In: Sollecito W, Johnson J, editors. McLaughlin and Kaluzny’s improvement in health care. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2013. p. 155–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delvin M-E, Braithwaite S, Camargo Plazas P. Canadian nurse practitioner’s quest for identity: a philosophical perspective. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018;5:110–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dracup K, Cronenwett L, Meleis A, Benner P. Reflections on the doctorate of nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53:177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher M. Clinical scholarship: nursing practice as an intellectual endeavour. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher HM, Montgomery K. Let’s call it ‘doctoral advanced practice nursing’. J Contin Nurs Educ. 2009;40:530–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher M. Global perspectives on the professional doctorate. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:403–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher M, Clinton P, Sperhac A. Can the Institute of Medicine trump the dominant logic of Nursing? Leading change in advanced practice education. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis L. The professional doctorate for nurses in Australia: findings of a scoping exercise. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26:484–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis L. Academics’ perceptions of the professional or clinical doctorate: findings of a national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:2272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang D, Bednash G. Identifying barriers and facilitators to future nurse faculty careers for DNP students. J Prof Nurs. 2017;33:56–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick K, Cohen C, Stone P. Analysing economic outcomes in advanced practice nursing. In: Kleinpell R, editor. Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin K, Carr E. The emergence of professional doctorates in nursing in the UK: where are we now? NT Res. 2003;8:293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner G, Chang A, Duffiekd C, Doubrovsky A. Delineating the practice profile of advanced practice nursing: a cross-sectional survey using the modified Strong model of advanced practice nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:1931–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner G, Duffield C, Doubrovsky A, Adams M. Identifying advanced practice: a national survey of a nursing workforce. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;55:60–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawlinski A, McCloy K, Erickson V, Vandenbogaart E, Dermenchyan A. Measuring outcomes in cardiovascular advanced practice nursing. In: Kleinpell R, editor. Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 88–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassick C, Huber M, Maeroff G. Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M, Straus S, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory M. Professional scholars and scholarly professionals. New Acad. 1997;(Summer):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes D, Yerrabati S. A systematic review of research on professional doctorates. Lond Rev Educ. 2018;16:11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heasling P. Frontiers of learning: the PhD Octopus. Dordrecht: Foris; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henly S, McCarthy D, Wyman J, Alt-White A, Stone P, McCarthy A-M, Redeker N, Dunbar-Jacob J, Titler M, Conley Y, Heitkemper M, Moore S. Emerging areas of nursing science and PhD education for the 21st century: response to commentaries. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. Br Med J. 2002;324:819–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapu A, Sicoutris C, Broyhill B, D’Agostino R, Kleinpell R. Measuring outcomes in advanced practice nursing: practice-specific quality metrics. In: Kleinpell R, editor. Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketefian S, Redman R. A critical examination of developments in nursing doctoral education in the United States. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2015;23:363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk Walker D, Polancich S. Doctor of nursing practice: the role of the advanced practice nurse. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015;31:263–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinpell R, editor. Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen L, Mikkonen I, Graham I, Norman L, Richardson J, Savage E, Schorn M. Advanced practice nursing for enduring health needs management global perspective. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32:540–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kot F, Hendel D. Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia: a comparative analysis. Stud High Educ. 2012;37:345–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S. A systematic approach to the assessment of impact in a professional doctorate. High Educ Skills Work Based Learn. 2014;4:171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester S. Conceptualising the practice doctorate. Stud High Educ. 2004;29:757–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Misener R, Harbman P, Donald F, Reid K, Kilpatrick K, Carter N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martsolf G, Auerbach D, Spetz J, Pearson M, Muchow A. Doctor of nursing practice 2015: an examination of nursing schools’ decisions to offer a doctor of nursing practice degree. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell T, Shanahan P. Towards a reconceptualization of the doctorate: issues arising from comparative data relating to the EdD degree in Australia. Stud High Educ. 1997;22:133–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell T. From first to second generation professional doctorates. Stud High Educ. 2003;28:279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell T, Kupczyck-Romanczuk G. Producing the professional doctorate: the portfolio as a legitimate alternative to the dissertation. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2009;46:135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell T. Australian professional doctorates: mapping distinctiveness: stress and prospects. Work Based Learn E J. 2011;2:24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels M, Skogsberg E. The scholars we need: preparing transdisciplinary professionals by leveraging the scholarship of practice. In: Braxton J, editor. Towards a scholarship of practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2017. p. 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara M. Lost in transition? A discursive analysis of academic nursing in Ireland. Nurs Sci Q. 2010;23:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar A, Caan W, Hillier D, Munn-Giddings C, Ramon S, Winter R. A shared experience: an interdisciplinary professional doctorate in health and social care. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2006;43:211–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundinger M, Kane R, Lenz E, Totten A, Tsai W, Cleary P, Friedewald W, Siu A, Shelanski ML. Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomised trial. JAMA. 2000;283:59–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse R, Stanik-Hutt J, White K, Johantgen M, Bass E, Zangaro G, et al. Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008: a systematic review. Nurs Econ. 2011;29:230–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M. The professional doctorate in nursing: a position paper. Image. 1997;29:361–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Rethinking science: mode 2 in societal context. In: Carayannis E, Campbell D, editors. Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse P. Ensuring a successful research endeavour. The Nurse Review of UK Research Councils. Department of Business Innovations and Skills (BIS/1/624). Accessed from https://www.gov.uk/goverenment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/478125/BIS-15-625-ensuring-a-successful-UK-research-endeavour.pdf.

  • Nursing Council of New Zealand (NCNZ). Competencies for the Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice. 2017. Accessed September 12, 2018, from https://www.nursingcouncil.org.nz.

  • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI). Advanced practice (Nursing) standards and requirements. Dublin: The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor L, Casey M, Smith R, Fealy G, O’Brien D, O’Leary D, Stokes D, Namara M, Glasgow ME, Cashin A. The universal, collaborative and dynamic model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice: a way forward? J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:e882–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oermann MH, Lynn MR, Agger CA. Hiring intentions of directors of nursing programs related to DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty and roles of faculty. J Prof Nurs. 2016;32(3):173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon L, Wolfe G, Brown D, Deary A, Olden K. Strategies for setting a national research agenda that is responsive to community needs. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1855–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paplham P, Austin-Ketch T. Doctor of nursing practice education: impact on advanced nursing practice. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015;31:273–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park C. Redefining the doctorate: discussion paper. York: The Higher Education Academy; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker M, Hill M. A review of advanced practice nursing in the United States, Canada, Australia and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017;4:196–2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson A, Borbasi S, Gott M. Doctoral education in nursing for practitioner knowledge and for academic knowledge: the University of Adelaide, Australia. Image. 1997;29:365–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson A. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: implications for quality management, improvement and innovation. High Educ Res Dev. 1999;18:269–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quatrara B, Dale Shaw K. Selecting advanced practice nursing outcomes measures. In: Kleinpell R, editor. Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharan P, Ashmore R, Nicklin L, Drew J. Nursing scholarship in the British system. Br J Nurs. 2001;10:196–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redman R, Pressler S, Furspan P, Potempa K. Nurses in the United States with a practice doctorate: implications for leading in the current context of health care. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed P. The practice turn in nursing epistemology. Nurs Sci Q. 2006;19:36–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed D, Titler MG, Dochterman JM, Shever LL, Kanak M, Picone DM. Measuring the dose of nursing intervention. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(4):121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J, Beal J, Lancaster D. Scholarly nursing practice from the perspective of experienced nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:425–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe G, Davies R. Second generation professional doctorates in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schober M, Affara F. International Council for Nurses: advanced nursing practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz A. Origins and aspirations: conceiving the clinical scholar. Excellence in nursing knowledge. 2005. Accessed from http://www.nursingknowledge.org/enk.

  • STTI. Sigma Theta Tau International Clinical Scholarship resource paper. 1999. Accessed December 17, 2015, from http://www.nursingsociety.org/about-stti/position-statements-and-resource-papers.

  • Stanik-Hutt J, Newhouse R, White K, Johantgen M, Bass E, Zangaro G, et al. The quality and effectiveness of care provided by nurse practitioners. J Nurse Pract. 2013;9:492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stew G. What is a doctorate for? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on PDs. UK Council for Graduate Education, Full Paper, vol. 1–7, pp. 22–23, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhaar M, Sylvia M. Scholarly work products of the doctor of nursing practice: one approach to evaluating scholarship, rigour, impact and quality. J Clin Nurs. 2015;25:163–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D. Is nursing viable as an academic discipline? Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29:694–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M, Schwartz Barcott D. The role of the nurse scientist as a knowledge broker. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019;51:26–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thoun D. Toward an appreciation of nursing scholarship: recognising our traditions, and presence. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48:552–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoun D. Speciality and advanced practice nursing: discerning the differences. Nurs Sci Q. 2011;24:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thune T. The training of “triple-helix workers”? Doctoral students in university-industry-government collaborations. Minerva. 2010;48:463–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafford V, Leshem S. Anatomy of a doctoral viva. J Grad Educ. 2002a;3:33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafford V, Leshem S. Starting at the end to undertake doctoral research: predictable questions as stepping stones. High Educ Rev. 2002b;33:43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udlis K, Mancuso J. Perceptions of the role of the doctor of nursing practice-prepared nurse: clarity or confusion. J Prof Nurs. 2015;31:274–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volpp K, Das A. Comparative effectiveness-thinking beyond medication A versus medication B. N Engl J Med. 2009;36:331–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallgren L, Dahlgren L. Doctoral education as social practice for knowledge development: conditioning and demands by industry PhD students. Indust High Educ. 2005;19:433–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker K, Campbell S, Duff J, Cummings E. Doctoral education for nurses today: the PhD or professional doctorate? Aust J Adv Nurs. 2016;34:60–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson R, Thompson D, Amelia E. Doctorates and nurses. Contemp Nurse. 2011;38:151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkies L, Mannix J, Jackson D. Practicing nurses perspectives of clinical scholarship: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2013;12:21. Accessed from https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6955-12-21.

  • World Health Organisation. World Report on knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. 2004. Accessed September 4, 2018, from http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/pub1/en/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, Dublin, Ireland

    Laserina O’Connor

Authors
  1. Laserina O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Connor, L. (2019). Doctorate of Nursing Practice: A Conduit for Scholarship in the Realm of Advanced Practice. In: The Nature of Scholarship, a Career Legacy Map and Advanced Practice. Advanced Practice in Nursing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91695-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91695-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91694-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91695-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation