Skip to main content

Semantic Description of Structural Health Monitoring Algorithms Using Building Information Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering (EG-ICE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10864))

Abstract

Information exchange among project stakeholders as part of structural life-cycle management has been gaining increasing interest in civil engineering. An integral part of structural life-cycle management is the operation and maintenance phase of structures, which is frequently associated with structural health monitoring (SHM). SHM has emerged as a novel methodology enabling the assessment of structural conditions by extracting information from structural response data and environmental data collected by sensors attached to structures. Representing a paradigm for exchanging information among stakeholders for structural life-cycle management, conventional building information, such as geometry, material and cost, is structured in so-called “building information models”. These models are defined within building information modeling (BIM) standards, such as the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). Furthermore, in recent research efforts, IFC-compliant descriptions of “monitoring-related information”, i.e. information on SHM systems, have been reported. However, semantic descriptions of algorithms employed for SHM (“SHM-related algorithms”) have not yet received adequate research attention. This paper introduces a semantic description approach for modeling and integrating SHM-related algorithms into IFC-based building information models. Specifically, this study focuses on algorithms embedded into wireless sensor nodes for automatically processing SHM data on board. The semantic description approach is validated by describing a wireless SHM system installed on a laboratory test structure designed and implemented with an embedded algorithm (fast Fourier transform). The expected outcome of this study is essentially an extension to the current IFC schema enabling the description of SHM-related algorithms in conjunction with SHM systems and structures to be monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EUBIM Taskgroup: Handbook for the introduction of building information modelling by the European public sector. Pan-European collaboration of public sector organizations across 21 countries (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ninic, J., Koch, C., Stascheit, J.: An integrated platform for design and numerical analysis of shield tunnelling processes on different levels of detail. Adv. Eng. Softw. 112, 165–179 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kropp, C., Koch, C., König, M.: Interior construction state recognition with 4D BIM registered image sequences. Autom. Constr. 86, 11–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicał, A.K., Wodyński, W.: Enhancing facility management through BIM 6D. Procedia Eng. 164, 299–306 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, J.C.P., Ma, L.Y.H.: A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning. Waste Manag. 33(6), 1539–1551 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B.: A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib. Digest 30(2), 91–105 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong, S., Zhang, Y., O’Connor, S., Lynch, J.P., Sohn, H., Law, K.H.: A NoSQL data management infrastructure for bridge monitoring. Smart Struct. Syst. 17(4), 669–690 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smarsly, K., Hartmann, D., Law, K.H.: An integrated monitoring system for life-cycle management of wind turbines. Int. J. Smart Struct. Syst. 12(2), 209–233 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smarsly, K., Hartmann, D., Law, K.H.: A computational framework for life-cycle management of wind turbines incorporating structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. Int. J. 12(4), 359–376 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, L., Yi, X., Zhu, D., Xie, X.Y., Wang, Y.: Damage detection of metro tunnel structure through transmissibility function and cross correlation analysis using local excitation and measurement. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 60, 59–74 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smarsly, K., Lehner, K., Hartmann, D.: Structural health monitoring based on artificial intelligence techniques. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 24 July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smarsly, K., Law, K.H., and König, M.: Resource-efficient wireless monitoring based on mobile agent migration. In: Proceedings of SPIE Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 06 March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peckens, C.A., Lynch, J.P.: Utilizing the cochlea as a bio-inspired compressive sensing technique. Smart Mater. Struct. 22(10), 105027 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bilek, J., Mittrup, I., Smarsly, K., Hartmann, D.: Agent-based concepts for the holistic modeling of concurrent processes in structural engineering. In: Proceedings of the 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Madeira, Portugal, 26 July 2003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC): OGC SensorML: Model and XML Encoding Standard. Wayland, MA, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. W3C Incubator Group: Semantic Sensor Network XG Final Report. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Cambridge, MA, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balmelli, L.: An overview of the systems modeling language for products and systems development. J. Object Technol. 6(6), 149–177 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition). https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/. Accessed 14 Jan 2018

  20. Lee, K.B.: IEEE 1451: a standard in support of smart transducer networking. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 01 April 2000

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smarsly, K., Theiler, M., Dragos, K.: IFC-based modeling of cyber-physical systems in civil engineering. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, Nottingham, UK, 10 July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  22. Theiler, M., Dragos, K., Smarsly, K.: BIM-based design of structural health monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA, 12 September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  23. Legatiuk, D., Theiler, M., Dragos, K., Smarsly, K.: A categorical approach towards metamodeling cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Stanford, CA, USA, 12 September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  24. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 16739:2013 – Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries. Geneva, Switzerland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Theiler, M., Smarsly, K.: IFC Monitor – An IFC extension for modeling structural health monitoring systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics (2018, Submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  26. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 9000:2015 – Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brett, A.C.: Procedures and algorithms. In: Linguistics 484 – Computational Linguistics – Grammars. Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, C., Helal, S.: Sifting through the jungle of sensor standards. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 84–88 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Compton, M., Neuhaus, H., Taylor, K., Tran, K.-N.: Reasoning about sensors and compositions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks, Washington, DC, USA, 26 October 2009

    Google Scholar 

  30. BuildingSmart: IFC4 Documentation: Industry Foundation Classes – Version 4 Addendum 2. http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/IFC4/Add2/html/. Accessed 24 Sept 2017

  31. Rio, J., Ferreira, B., Pocas-Martins, J.: Expansion of IFC model with structural sensors [Expansión del modelo IFC con sensores estructurales]. Informes de la Construcción 65(530), 219–228 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 10303-11:2004 – Industrial automation systems and integration – Product data representation and exchange – Part 11: Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual. Geneva, Switzerland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tauscher, E., Theiler, M.: apstex IFC Framework. http://www.apstex.com. Accessed 15 Jan 2018. Weimar, Germany

  34. BuildingSMART International, iabi, AEC3 and APSTEX. B-Cert – The official platform for the buildingSMART IFC4 certification. http://www.b-cert.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2018. Berlin, Munich and Weimar, Germany

  35. Civionics: Percēv System – Intelligent decisions driven by intelligent sensors (Product data sheet). Civionics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cooley, J.W., Tukey, J.W.: An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math. Comput. 19(90), 297–301 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 10303-21:2016 – Industrial automation systems and integration – Product data representation and exchange – Part 21: Implementation methods: Clear text encoding of the exchange structure. Geneva, Switzerland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Böhm, C., Jacopini, G.: Flow diagrams, turing machines and languages with only two formation rules. Commun. ACM 9(5), 366–371 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grant SM 281/7-1. The financial support is gratefully appreciated. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the German Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Theiler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Theiler, M., Dragos, K., Smarsly, K. (2018). Semantic Description of Structural Health Monitoring Algorithms Using Building Information Modeling. In: Smith, I., Domer, B. (eds) Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering. EG-ICE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91637-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91638-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics