Abstract
Adaptive structures are sensed and actuated to modify internal forces and shape to maintain optimal performance in response to loads. The use of large shape changes as a structural adaptation strategy to counteract the effect of loads has been investigated previously. When large shape changes are employed, structures are designed to change shape as the load changes thus giving the opportunity to homogenize stresses. In this way, the design is not governed by peak loads that occur very rarely. Simulations have shown a significant amount of embodied energy can be reduced with respect to optimized active structures limited to small shape changes and with respect to passive structures. However, in these previous studies, the actuator layout was assigned a-priori.
This paper presents a new method to search for an actuator layout that is optimum to counteract the effect of loads via large shape changes. The objective is to design the actuation system allowing the structure to ‘morph’ into shapes optimized to maximize material utilization for each load case. A combination of simulated annealing and the nonlinear force method is proposed to meet both the actuator placement problem and to determine appropriate actuator commands. A heuristic for near-neighbor generation based on the actuator control efficacy is employed to explore effectively the large search space. Case studies show the proposed method converges to the global optimum for simple configurations and generally produces actuator layouts enabling shape control even with a low number of actuators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Straube, J.: Green building and sustainability. Building Science Digests, 24 October 2006
Gil, L., Andreu, A.: Shape and cross-section optimisation of a truss structure. Comput. Struct. 79, 681–689 (2001)
Wang, D., Zhang, W., Jiang, J.: Truss shape optimization with multiple displacement constraints. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, 3597–3612 (2002)
Shea, K., Smith, I.F.C.: Improving full-scale transmission tower design through topology and shape optimization. Struct. Eng. 132(5), 781–790 (2006)
Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Hanna, S., Labbe, F., Winslow, P.: Adaptive structures for whole life energy savings. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. (IASS) 52(170), 233–240 (2011)
Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Winslow, P.: Whole-life energy and cost assessment of adaptive structures - case studies. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) (in press)
Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Winslow, P., Wise, C.: Shape control and whole-life energy assessment of an “infinitely stiff” prototype adaptive structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 27(1), 015022 (2017)
Reksowardojo, A., Senatore, G., Smith, I.: Large and reversible shape changes as a strategy for structural adaptation. In: Proceeding of International Association for Shell and Spacial Structures (IASS) (2017)
Skelton, R.E., Sultan, C.: Integrated design of controllable tensegrity structures. Adapt. Struct. Mater. Syst. 54, 27–35 (1997)
Soong, T.T., Manolis, G.D.: Active structures. J. Struct. Eng. 113(11), 2290–2302 (1987)
Manning, R.A.: Optimum design of intelligent truss structures. In: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Co-located (1991)
Furuya, H., Haftka, R.Z.: Placing actuators on space structures by genetic algorithms and effectiveness indexes. Struct. Optim. 9, 69–75 (1995)
Begg, D.W., Liu, X.: On simultaneous optimization of smart structures – part II: algorithms and examples. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 184(1), 25–37 (2000)
de Jager, B., Skelton, R.: Input/output selection for planar tensegrity models. In: Proceedings of 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando (2001)
Korkmaz, S., Ben Hadj Ali, N., Smith, I.F.C.: Configuration of control system for damage tolerance of a tensegrity bridge. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26, 145–155 (2012)
Grierson, D.: Pareto multi-criteria decision making. Adv. Eng. Inform. 22, 371–384 (2008)
Sauve, R.: Advances in dynamic relaxation techniques for nonlinear finite element. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 117, 170–176 (1995)
Patnaik, S.: An integrated force method for discrete analysis. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 6, 237–251 (1973)
Senatore, G.: Adaptive building structures. Doctoral dissertation, University College London, London (2016)
Yuan, X., Liang, X., Li, A.: Shape and force control of prestressed cable-strut structures based on nonlinear force method. Adv. Struct. Eng. 19(12), 1917–1926 (2016)
Pellegrino, S.: Structural computations with the singular value decomposition of the equilibrium matrix. Int. J. Solids Struct. 30(21), 3025–3035 (1993)
You, Z.: Displacement control of prestressed structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 144, 51–59 (1997)
Luo, Y., Lu, J.: Geometrically non-linear force method for assemblies with infinitesimal mechanisms. Comput. Struct. 84, 2194–2199 (2006)
Kahla, N., Kebiche, K.: Nonlinear elastoplastic analysis of tensegrity systems. Comput. Struct. 22, 1552–1566 (2000)
Xu, X., Luo, Y.: Non-liear displacement control of prestressed cable structures. J. Aerosp. Eng. 223, 1001–1007 (2009)
Pellegrino, S., Calladine, C.: Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 22, 409–428 (1986)
Lax, P., Burstein, S., Lax, A.: Calculus with Applications and Computing. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York (1972)
Achtziger, W.: On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 33, 285–304 (2007)
Pastor, M., Binda, M., Harčarik, T.: Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Eng. 48, 543–548 (2012)
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, J.C., Vecchi, M.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–679 (1983)
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Teller, A., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953)
Reddy, G., Cagan, J.: An improved shape annealing algorithm for truss topology generation. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117, 315–321 (1995)
Onoda, J., Hanawa, Y.: Actuator placement optimization by genetic and improved simulated annealing algorithms. AIAA J. 31, 1167–1169 (1992)
Arora, J., Elwakeil, O., Chahande, A.: Global optimization methods for engineering applications: a review. Struct. Optim. 9, 137–159 (1995)
Cheh, K., Goldberg, J., Askin, R.: A note on the effect of neighborhood structure in simulated annealing. Comput. Oper. Res. 18(6), 537–547 (1991)
Eurocode 1 Actions on structures—General actions—Part 1–4: Wind (1991)
Acknowledgements
The research presented in this paper is supported by the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship (ESKAS-Nr: 2016.0749).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reksowardojo, A.P., Senatore, G., Smith, I.F.C. (2018). Actuator Layout Optimization for Adaptive Structures Performing Large Shape Changes. In: Smith, I., Domer, B. (eds) Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering. EG-ICE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91637-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91638-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)