Skip to main content

Actuator Layout Optimization for Adaptive Structures Performing Large Shape Changes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering (EG-ICE 2018)

Abstract

Adaptive structures are sensed and actuated to modify internal forces and shape to maintain optimal performance in response to loads. The use of large shape changes as a structural adaptation strategy to counteract the effect of loads has been investigated previously. When large shape changes are employed, structures are designed to change shape as the load changes thus giving the opportunity to homogenize stresses. In this way, the design is not governed by peak loads that occur very rarely. Simulations have shown a significant amount of embodied energy can be reduced with respect to optimized active structures limited to small shape changes and with respect to passive structures. However, in these previous studies, the actuator layout was assigned a-priori.

This paper presents a new method to search for an actuator layout that is optimum to counteract the effect of loads via large shape changes. The objective is to design the actuation system allowing the structure to ‘morph’ into shapes optimized to maximize material utilization for each load case. A combination of simulated annealing and the nonlinear force method is proposed to meet both the actuator placement problem and to determine appropriate actuator commands. A heuristic for near-neighbor generation based on the actuator control efficacy is employed to explore effectively the large search space. Case studies show the proposed method converges to the global optimum for simple configurations and generally produces actuator layouts enabling shape control even with a low number of actuators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Straube, J.: Green building and sustainability. Building Science Digests, 24 October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gil, L., Andreu, A.: Shape and cross-section optimisation of a truss structure. Comput. Struct. 79, 681–689 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, D., Zhang, W., Jiang, J.: Truss shape optimization with multiple displacement constraints. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, 3597–3612 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shea, K., Smith, I.F.C.: Improving full-scale transmission tower design through topology and shape optimization. Struct. Eng. 132(5), 781–790 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Hanna, S., Labbe, F., Winslow, P.: Adaptive structures for whole life energy savings. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. (IASS) 52(170), 233–240 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Winslow, P.: Whole-life energy and cost assessment of adaptive structures - case studies. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Senatore, G., Duffour, P., Winslow, P., Wise, C.: Shape control and whole-life energy assessment of an “infinitely stiff” prototype adaptive structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 27(1), 015022 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reksowardojo, A., Senatore, G., Smith, I.: Large and reversible shape changes as a strategy for structural adaptation. In: Proceeding of International Association for Shell and Spacial Structures (IASS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skelton, R.E., Sultan, C.: Integrated design of controllable tensegrity structures. Adapt. Struct. Mater. Syst. 54, 27–35 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soong, T.T., Manolis, G.D.: Active structures. J. Struct. Eng. 113(11), 2290–2302 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manning, R.A.: Optimum design of intelligent truss structures. In: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Co-located (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Furuya, H., Haftka, R.Z.: Placing actuators on space structures by genetic algorithms and effectiveness indexes. Struct. Optim. 9, 69–75 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Begg, D.W., Liu, X.: On simultaneous optimization of smart structures – part II: algorithms and examples. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 184(1), 25–37 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jager, B., Skelton, R.: Input/output selection for planar tensegrity models. In: Proceedings of 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korkmaz, S., Ben Hadj Ali, N., Smith, I.F.C.: Configuration of control system for damage tolerance of a tensegrity bridge. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26, 145–155 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grierson, D.: Pareto multi-criteria decision making. Adv. Eng. Inform. 22, 371–384 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauve, R.: Advances in dynamic relaxation techniques for nonlinear finite element. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 117, 170–176 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patnaik, S.: An integrated force method for discrete analysis. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 6, 237–251 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Senatore, G.: Adaptive building structures. Doctoral dissertation, University College London, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan, X., Liang, X., Li, A.: Shape and force control of prestressed cable-strut structures based on nonlinear force method. Adv. Struct. Eng. 19(12), 1917–1926 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellegrino, S.: Structural computations with the singular value decomposition of the equilibrium matrix. Int. J. Solids Struct. 30(21), 3025–3035 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. You, Z.: Displacement control of prestressed structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 144, 51–59 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, Y., Lu, J.: Geometrically non-linear force method for assemblies with infinitesimal mechanisms. Comput. Struct. 84, 2194–2199 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kahla, N., Kebiche, K.: Nonlinear elastoplastic analysis of tensegrity systems. Comput. Struct. 22, 1552–1566 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, X., Luo, Y.: Non-liear displacement control of prestressed cable structures. J. Aerosp. Eng. 223, 1001–1007 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pellegrino, S., Calladine, C.: Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 22, 409–428 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lax, P., Burstein, S., Lax, A.: Calculus with Applications and Computing. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Achtziger, W.: On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 33, 285–304 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Pastor, M., Binda, M., Harčarik, T.: Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Eng. 48, 543–548 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, J.C., Vecchi, M.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–679 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Teller, A., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reddy, G., Cagan, J.: An improved shape annealing algorithm for truss topology generation. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117, 315–321 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Onoda, J., Hanawa, Y.: Actuator placement optimization by genetic and improved simulated annealing algorithms. AIAA J. 31, 1167–1169 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arora, J., Elwakeil, O., Chahande, A.: Global optimization methods for engineering applications: a review. Struct. Optim. 9, 137–159 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheh, K., Goldberg, J., Askin, R.: A note on the effect of neighborhood structure in simulated annealing. Comput. Oper. Res. 18(6), 537–547 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eurocode 1 Actions on structures—General actions—Part 1–4: Wind (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is supported by the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship (ESKAS-Nr: 2016.0749).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arka P. Reksowardojo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reksowardojo, A.P., Senatore, G., Smith, I.F.C. (2018). Actuator Layout Optimization for Adaptive Structures Performing Large Shape Changes. In: Smith, I., Domer, B. (eds) Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering. EG-ICE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91638-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91637-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91638-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics