Advertisement

Batyrev Mirror Symmetry

Conference paper
  • 695 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 240)

Abstract

We describe Batyrev’s construction of the mirror to a family of Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in a Fano toric variety, based on polar duality for lattice polytopes. We revisit the example of the quintic threefold in this language, and briefly mention connections with later developments, such as the Batyrev–Borisov construction for complete intersections in Fano toric varieties, and the Gross–Siebert program.

Keywords

Batyrev Lattice Polytope Toric Fano Varieties Polar Duality Quintic Threefolds 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am happy to thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Philip Candelas, Xenia C. de la Ossa, Paul S. Green, and Linda Parkes. A pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory. Nuclear Phys. B, 359(1):21–74, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Victor V. Batyrev. Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties. J. Algebraic Geom., 3(3):493–535, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Victor V. Batyrev and Lev A. Borisov. On Calabi-Yau complete intersections in toric varieties. In Higher-dimensional complex varieties (Trento, 1994), pages 39–65. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. Affine manifolds, log structures, and mirror symmetry. Turkish J. Math., 27(1):33–60, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data. I. J. Differential Geom., 72(2):169–338, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mark Gross and Bernd Siebert. Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data, II. J. Algebraic Geom., 19(4):679–780, 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    David A. Cox. Mirror symmetry and polar duality of polytopes. Symmetry, 7(3):1633, 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.A. Cox and S. Katz. Mirror Symmetry and Algebraic Geometry. Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.A. Cox, J.B. Little, and H.K. Schenck. Toric Varieties. Graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical Soc., 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeffrey C. Lagarias and Günter M. Ziegler. Bounds for lattice polytopes containing a fixed number of interior points in a sublattice. Canad. J. Math., 43(5):1022–1035, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maximilian Kreuzer and Harald Skarke. Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 4(6):1209–1230, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    David Cox. What is a toric variety? In Topics in algebraic geometry and geometric modeling, volume 334 of Contemp. Math., pages 203–223. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Victor V. Batyrev and Lev A. Borisov. Mirror duality and string-theoretic Hodge numbers. Invent. Math., 126(1):183–203, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Victor V. Batyrev and Dimitrios I. Dais. Strong McKay correspondence, string-theoretic Hodge numbers and mirror symmetry. Topology, 35(4):901–929, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lev Borisov. Towards the Mirror Symmetry for Calabi-Yau Complete intersections in Gorenstein Toric Fano Varieties. Preprint, arXiv:alg-geom/9310001.
  16. 16.
    Mark Gross. Toric degenerations and Batyrev-Borisov duality. Math. Ann., 333(3):645–688, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Pacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations