Abstract
Children make quantifier-spreading errors in contexts involving sets in partial one-to-one correspondence; e.g., Every bunny is in a box is rejected as a description of three bunnies, each in a box, along with two extra boxes. To determine whether a signature pattern of visual attention is associated with the classic q-spreading error as it occurs in real time, eye-movements were recorded while children (N = 41; mean 8 y;9 m, range 5;8–12;1) performed a sentence-picture verification task , with every modifying either the figure or ground of locative scenes (every bunny vs. every box). On trials designed to elicit the classic error, children performed at chance (53.3% correct). Errors involved greater numbers of fixations to the extra objects/containers, time-locked to regions following the quantified noun phrase. Correct responses were associated with longer reaction times , indicating additional processing required for quantifier restriction; accuracy was uncorrelated with verbal or nonverbal intelligence and only weakly associated with age. The findings underscore the susceptibility of school-age children to make errors given a default expectation for distributive quantifiers like every to refer to sets in one-to-one correspondence and their inattention to sentence structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baayen, R.H., D.J. Davidson, and D.M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Berent, G.P., R.R. Kelly, and T. Schueler-Choukairi. 2009. Economy in the Acquisition of English Universal Quantifier Sentences: The Interpretations of Deaf and Hearing Students and Second Language Learners at the College Level. Applied Psycholinguistics 30: 251–290.
Bliese, P.D., and R.E. Ployhart. 2002. Growth Modeling using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and Illustrations. Organizational Research Methods 5 (4): 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442802237116.
Brooks, P.J., and M.D.S. Braine. 1996. What do Children Know About the Universal Quantifiers ‘All’ and ‘Each’? Cognition 60: 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00712-3.
Brooks, P.J., and I.A. Sekerina. 2005. Shortcuts to Quantifier Interpretation in Children and Adults. Language Acquisition 13: 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1303_2.
Brooks, P.J., and I.A. Sekerina. 2006. Shallow Processing of Universal Quantification: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Adults. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. R. Sun, 2450. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, L., R.J. Sherbenou, and S.K. Johnson. 1997. The Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: A Language Free Measure of Cognitive Ability, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Bucci, W. 1978. The Interpretation of Universal Affirmative Propositions. Cognition 6 (1): 55–77.
Cacioppo, J.T., R.E. Petty, and C.F. Kao. 1984. The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 48: 306–307.
Cattell, R.B., and H.E.P. Cattell. 1973. Measuring Intelligence with the Culture-fair Tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Clahsen, H., and C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical Processing in Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 3–42. doi:10.1017.S0142716406060024.
Clark, H.H., and W.G. Chase. 1972. On the Process of Comparing Sentences Against Pictures. Cognitive Psychology 3 (3): 472–517.
Crain, S., R. Thornton, C. Boster, L. Conway, D. Lillo-Martin, and E. Woodams. 1996. Quantification Without Qualification. Language Acquisition 5 (2): 83–153. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0502_2.
DelliCarpini, M. 2003. Developmental Stages in the Semantic Acquisition of Quantification by Adult L2 Learners of English: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002): L2 Links, ed. J.M. Liceras, H. Zobl, and H. Goodluck, 55–63. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Donaldson, M., and P. Lloyd. 1974. Sentences and Situations: Children’s Judgments of Match and Mismatch. In Problèmes actuels en psycholinguistique, Colloques internationaux du Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, ed. F. Bresson, 74–86. Paris: Centre National de Recherche Scientifique.
Drozd, K. 2001. Children’s Weak Interpretations of Universally Quantified Questions. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. M. Bowerman and S.C. Levinson, 340–376. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, L.M., and D.M. Dunn. 2007. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th ed. Pearson.
Felser, C., and H. Clahsen. 2009. Grammatical Processing of Spoken Language in Child and Adult Language Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 38 (3): 305–319.
Ferreira, F. 2003. The Misinterpretation of Noncanonical Sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47 (2): 164–203.
Ferreira, F., K.G. Bailey, and V. Ferraro. 2002. Good-enough Representations in Language Comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (1): 11–15.
Forster, K.L., and J.C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A Windows Display Program with Millisecond Accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35: 116–124.
Freeman, N.H. 1985. Reasonable Errors in Basic Reasoning. Educational Psychology 5 (3–4): 239–249.
Geurts, B. 2003. Quantifying Kids. Language Acquisition 11 (4): 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1104_1.
Huettig, F., J. Rommers, and A.S. Meyer. 2011. Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Language Processing: A Review and Critical Evaluation. Acta Psychologica 137: 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003.
Inhelder, B., and J. Piaget. 1964. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child: Classification and Seriation. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Jaeger, T.F. 2008. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and Towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
Minai, U., N. Jincho, N. Yamane, and R. Mazuka. 2012. What hinders Child Semantic Computation: Children’s Universal Quantification and the Development of Cognitive Control. Journal of Child Language 39: 919–956. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000316.
O’Grady, W., T. Suguzi, and N. Yoshinaga. 2010. Quantifier Spreading: Evidence from Japanese. Language Learning and Development 6 (2): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440903352799.
Philip, W. 1995. Event Quantification in the Acquisition of Universal Quantification. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA Publications.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (version 3.1.0). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rakhlin, N. 2007. A New Pragmatic Account of Quantifier-spreading. Nanzan Linguistics 8: 239–282.
Roeper, T., and J. De Villiers. 1993. The Emergence of Bound Variable Structures. In Knowledge and Language, Volume 1, from Orwell’s Problem to Plato’s Problem, ed. E. Reuland and W. Abraham, 105–139. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roeper, T., U. Strauss, and B.Z. Pearson. 2004. The Acquisition Path of Quantifiers: Two Kinds of Spreading. Ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst. http://people.umass.edu/roeper/online_papers/pathof%20acquisition3-15c.pdf.
Sanford, A.J., and P. Sturt. 2002. Depth of Processing in Language Comprehension: Not Noticing the Evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (9): 382–386.
Sekerina, I.A., and A. Sauermann. 2015. Visual Attention and Quantifier-spreading in Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Second Language Research 31 (1): 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583|4537292.
Street, J.A., and E. Dąbrowska. 2010. More Individual Differences in Language Attainment: How Much do Adult Native Speakers of English Know About Passives and Quantifiers? Lingua 120: 2080–2094.
Trueswell, J.C., and M.K. Tanenhaus (eds.). 2004. Approaches to Studying Word-situated Language Use. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Acknowledgements
Irina Sekerina and Patricia Brooks share first authorship and made equal contributions to the study. We extend our gratitude to the parents, teachers, and children at St. Thomas-St. Joseph School in Staten Island, NY, for their involvement in the study. We also thank Annemarie Donachie, Carolin Obermann Linxen, and Kasey Powers for their assistance in collecting and tabulating the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sekerina, I.A., Brooks, P.J., Campanelli, L., Schwartz, A.M. (2018). Quantifier Spreading in School-Age Children: An Eye-Tracking Study. In: É. Kiss, K., Zétényi, T. (eds) Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Quantification. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91566-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91566-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91565-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91566-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)