Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Classificatory Reader: Relating to Others Through Digital Texts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender and Relatability in Digital Culture

  • 1148 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the formation of a digital intimate public via the actions of readers in relating to texts. Drawing on the work of Michael Warner (Public Culture 14:49–50, 2002), I resituate reading and the digital literacy required as central to social participation in digital publics. Following the insights of Louise Rosenblatt (The Reader, the Text, the Poem, Southern Illinois, London, 1978), I suggest that reading in the WSWCM public is an imaginative social act, in which readers co-construct texts through ‘girlfriend’ knowledges derived from mediated and social cultures of femininity. I explain how Tumblr’s architectures blur the distinctions between reading and blogging, inviting a sameness based on shared imaginaries, knowledges and literacies that are conducive to public formation. Particularly due to the GIF and caption format of the texts, a high degree of reader involvement and knowledge is required. At the same time, competencies in classification are required as part of this digital literacy. Reading involves a ‘database logic’ (Manovich in The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001) in making meaning out of GIFs, sorting, distilling and instrumentalising situations, bodies and meanings in ways that often assume a disconnection from social and historical contexts. This classificatory competency departs from a presumed location of whiteness and middle class membership, in this public, meaning that not all readers can belong in the same way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark, Alison Hearn, and Helen Kennedy. 2015. “Cultural Studies of Data Mining: Introduction.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, Ien. 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Translated by Della Couling. London and New York: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, James. 2015. “Sensation, Networks and the GIF: Toward an Allotropic Account of Affect.” In Networked Affect, edited by Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, 119–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2012. Authentic TM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, Jennifer. 2017. “Facebook and Absent-Present Rhetorics of Whiteness.” In Rhetorics of Whiteness: Postracial Hauntings in Popular Culture, Social Media, and Education, edited by Tammie M. Kennedy, Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe, 132–144. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, David. 2014. Popular Culture and New Media: The Politics of Circulation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benioff, David, and D.B. Weiss. 2011. Game of Thrones. United States: HBO Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Jean. 2011. “User-Created Content and Everyday Cultural Practice: Lessons from YouTube.” In Television as Digital Media, edited by James Bennett and Niki Strange, 311–331. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, Digital Media and Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casserly, Meghan. 2012. “#WhatShouldWeCallMe Revealed: The 24-Year Old Law Students Behind the New Tumblr Darling.” Last Modified March 29. http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/03/29/whatshouldwecallme-revealed-24-year-old-law-students-tumblr-darling/. Accessed March 25.

  • Cho, Alexander. 2011. “Queer Tumblrs, Networked Counterpublics.” Conference Papers—International Communication Association, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Alexander. 2015. “Queer Reverb: Tumblr, Affect, Time.” In Networked Affect, edited by Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, 43–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Grace Y., and Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz. 2017. “Giving a New Makeover to STEAM: Establishing YouTube Beauty Gurus as Digital Literacy Educators Through Messages and Effects on Viewers.” Computers in Human Behavior 73: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, James, and Richard K. Blot. 2003. Literacy and Literacies: Texts, Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Margaret, and Ngaire Naffine. 2001. Are Persons Property? Legal Debates About Property and Personality. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, Amy Shields. 2011. “Hetero-Sexy Representation by Young Women on MySpace: The Politics of Performing an ‘Objectified’ Self.” Outskirts: Feminisms Along the Edge 25. Accessed June 18, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Marty, and Quinn Miller. 2014. “Trans Media Moments: Tumblr, 2011–2013.” Television & New Media 15 (7): 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413505002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian. 2015. Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, James Paul. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Jessica. 2007. “Agency and Authority in Role-Playing ‘Texts’.” In A New Literacies Sampler, edited by Michelle Knobel and Colin Lankshear, 67–94. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Matt. 2015. “Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study.” Young 23 (3): 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815577878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, Engin, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2015. Being Digital Citizens. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karolides, Nicholas J. 1991. Reader Response in the Classroom: Evoking and Interpreting Meaning in Literature. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Tammie M., Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe. 2005. “The Matter of Whiteness: Or, Why Whiteness Studies Is Important to Rhetoric and Composition Studies.” Rhetoric Review 24 (4): 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, Alana, and Justine Humphry. 2016. “Antiracism Apps: Framing Understandings and Approaches to Antiracism Education and Intervention.” Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1240824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Sonia. 2008. “Engaging With Media—A Matter of Literacy?” Communication, Culture & Critique 1 (1): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00006.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Terry. 2005. “Louise Rosenblatt: Thanks for the Memory.” The English Journal 94 (5): 17–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailloux, Steven. 2005. “In Memoriam: Louise M. Rosenblatt, 1904–2005.” PMLA 120 (3): 886–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.

  • McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Vincent. 2008. “New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (4): 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094659.

  • Miltner, Kate, and Tim Highfield. 2017. “Never Gonna GIF You Up: Analyzing the Cultural Significance of the Animated GIF.” Social Media + Society 3 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117725223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Lisa. 2008. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Lisa. 2014. “‘I WILL DO EVERYthing That Am Asked’: Scambaiting, Digital Show-Space, and the Racial Violence of Social Media.” Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914546845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, Mariana. 2006. “Being Lovingly, Knowingly Ignorant: White Feminism and Women of Color.” Hypatia 21 (3): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01113.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleo, Sylvia. 2013. “Revisiting Rosenblatt’s Aesthetic Response Through The Arrival.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 36: 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Zizi. 2014. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radway, Janice. 1984. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambukkana, Nathan. 2016. “From #RaceFail to #Ferguson: The Digital Intimacies of Race- Activist Hashtag Publics.” In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, edited by Nathan Rambukkana, 29–46. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rault, Jasmine. 2017. “White Noise, White Affects: Filtering the Sameness of Queer Suffering.” Feminist Media Studies 17 (4): 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1326557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, Bryce. 2015. “Where I can be Myself … Where I can Speak my Mind”: Networked Counterpublics in a Polymedia Environment. New Media & Society 17 (9): 1513–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481453009.

  • Rheingold, Howard. 2012. Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’.” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem. London: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Thomas. 1997. “Innocence and Affirmative Action.” In Critical White Studies, 27–32. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, April. 2012. “Rosenblatt’s Presence in the New Literacies Research.” Talking Points 24 (1): 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siles, Ignacio. 2012. “Web Technologies of the Self: The Arising of the ‘Blogger’ Identity.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01581.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2013. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Jackie. 1994. Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, Brian V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strle, Danielle. 2013. “In Conversation with Danielle Strle of Tumblr.” Last Modified September 20. http://library.fora.tv/2013/09/20/In_Conversation_with_Danielle_Strle_of_Tumblr. Accessed August 10.

  • Sundén, Jenny. 2003. Material Virtualities. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiidenberg, Katrin, and Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2015. “Selfies, Image and the Re-making of the Body.” Body and Society 21(4): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x15592465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, José. 2015. “After Connectivity: The Era of Connectication.” Social Media + Society 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578873.

  • van Doorn, Niels, Liesbet van Zoonen, and Sally Wyatt. 2007. “Writing from Experience: Presentations of Gender Identity on Weblogs.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (2): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807075819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zoonen, Liesbet. 1994. Feminist Media Studies, the Media, Culture & Society Series. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Michael. 2002. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14 (1): 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Michele. 2006. The Body and the Screen: Theories of Internet Spectatorship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1961. The Long Revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Alison. 2013. Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Media, Film and Journalism, Monash University, Caulfield, VIC, Australia

    Akane Kanai

Authors
  1. Akane Kanai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kanai, A. (2019). The Classificatory Reader: Relating to Others Through Digital Texts. In: Gender and Relatability in Digital Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91515-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91515-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91514-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91515-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation