Skip to main content

Design of a Decision Support System for Buried Pipeline Corrosion Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Applications (IPMU 2018)

Abstract

Maintaining the level of integrity of pipeline networks to guarantee at least a reliable and safe service is a challenge operators of such networks are facing everyday. TIGF is one of the French operator which manages 5000 km of pipelines in the south-west quarter of France. This paper presents a decision-making tool which automatically ranks the pipeline sections regarding the risk of deterioration (damages and corrosion) and the gravity of the consequences, indicating which pipeline sections should be excavated. The tool relies on a fuzzy expert system which gathers 26 input variables, processes more than 300 rules, classifies the risk of deterioration into 7 classes and estimates the gravity. The rules are a formalization of human expertise: the fuzzy logic helps to tackle the vagueness of their knowledge and the measurement inaccuracy of some of the 26 input variables. The method has been tested on past excavations to assess its performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Athanasopoulos, G., Riba, C.R., Athanasopoulou, C.: A decision support system for coating selection based on fuzzy logic and multi-criteria decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(8), 10848–10853 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchon-Meunier, B., Laurent, A., Lesot, M.J., Rifqi, M.: Strengthening fuzzy gradual rules through “all the more” clauses. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2940–2946 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brito, A., de Almeida, A.: Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(2), 187–198 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cagno, E., Caron, F., Mancini, M., Ruggeri, F.: Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust bayesian approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 67, 275–284 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caleyo, F., Valor, A., Alfonso, L., Vidal, J., Perez-Baruch, E., Hallen, J.: Bayesian analysis of external corrosion data of non-piggable underground pipelines. Corros. Sci. 90(Suppl. C), 33–45 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, I., Marney, D.: The science of pipe corrosion: a review of the literature on the corrosion of ferrous metals in soils. Corros. Sci. 56(Suppl. C), 5–16 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Abbasy, M., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., Parvizsedghy, L., Mirahadi, F.: Unpiggable oil and gas pipeline condition forecasting models. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30(1) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishawy, H.A., Gabbar, H.A.: Review of pipeline integrity management practices. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 87(7), 373–380 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, S.X., Yu, S.R., Zeng, H.L., Li, J.H., Liang, R.: Predicting corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines with a mechanically-based probabilistic model. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 65(3), 162–166 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Markowski, A.S., Mannan, M.S.: Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22(6), 921–927 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martins, A.G., Nicholson, E.: A fuzzy logic model designed for quantitative risk analysis based on ECDA data. In: CORROSION, Dallas (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poli, J.P., Laurent, J.P.: Touch interface for guided authoring of expert systems rules. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 1781–1788 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Torra, V.: A review of the construction of hierarchical fuzzy systems. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 17(5), 531–543 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Y., Khan, F., Thodi, P., Abbassi, R.: Corrosion induced failure analysis of subsea pipelines. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 159(Suppl. C), 214–222 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. You, Q., Fan, J., Zhu, W., Bai, Y.: Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline network based on fuzzy multi-attribute method. J. Appl. Sci. 14, 955–959 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Boudet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boudet, L., Poli, JP., Bel, A., Castillon, F., Gaigne, F., Casula, O. (2018). Design of a Decision Support System for Buried Pipeline Corrosion Assessment. In: Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Verdegay, J., Perfilieva, I., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Applications. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91479-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91479-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91478-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91479-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics