Skip to main content

Application of Aggregation Operators to Assess the Credibility of User-Generated Content in Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 853))

Abstract

Nowadays, User-Generated Content (UGC) spreads across social media through Web 2.0 technologies, in the absence of traditional trusted third parties that can verify its credibility. The issue of assessing the credibility of UGC is a recent research topic, which has been tackled by many approaches as a classification problem: information is automatically categorized into genuine and fake, usually by employing data-driven solutions, based on Machine Learning (ML) techniques. In this paper, to address some open issues concerning the use of ML, and to give to the decision maker a major control on the process of UGC credibility assessment, the importance that the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm can have in association with the use of aggregation operators is discussed. Some potential aggregation schemes and their properties are illustrated, as well as some interesting research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., Calvo, T.: Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners, vol. 221. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73721-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Calvo, T., Kolesárová, A., Komorníková, M., Mesiar, R.: Aggregation operators: properties, classes and construction methods. In: Calvo, T., Mayor, G., Mesiar, R. (eds.) Aggregation Operators. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 97, pp. 3–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1787-4_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Viviani, M.: A multi-dimensional and event-based model for trust computation in the social web. In: Aberer, K., Flache, A., Jager, W., Liu, L., Tang, J., Guéret, C. (eds.) SocInfo 2012. LNCS, vol. 7710, pp. 323–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Viviani, M.: Security and trust in online social networks. Synth. Lect. Inf. Secur. Priv. Trust 4(3), 1–120 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. In: Annales de l’institut Fourier, vol. 5, pp. 131–295 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On the use of aggregation operations in information fusion processes. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 142(1), 143–161 (2004). Aggregation Techniques

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyer, J.S.: MAUT - multi-attribute utility theory. In: Greco, S. (ed.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 265–292. Springer, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Eysenbach, G.: Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. In: Metzger, M.M., Flanagin, A.J. (eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 123–154. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 80–87. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(3), 445–456 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., Meyer, P.: A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: applications of the Kappalab R package. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(2), 766–785 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.-L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Aggregation functions: means. Inf. Sci. 181(1), 1–22 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hajli, M.N., Sims, J., Featherman, M., Love, P.E.: Credibility of information in online communities. J. Strateg. Mark. 23(3), 238–253 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heydari, A., Ali Tavakoli, M., Salim, N., Heydari, Z.: Detection of review spam: a survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3634–3642 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 53(1), 59–68 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang, A.: The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J. Commun. 50(1), 46–70 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luca, M., Zervas, G.: Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Manag. Sci. 62(12), 3412–3427 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marichal, J.-L.: Aggregation operators for multicriteria decision aid. Ph.D. thesis, Universtié de Liège - Faculté des Sciences, Department of Management, FEGSS, Boulevard du Rectorat 7–B31 B-4000 Liège, Belgium (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mesiar, R.: Basic classification of aggregation operators and some construction methods. In: Reusch, B. (ed.) Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications, pp. 545–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31182-3_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Metzger, M.J.: Making sense of credibility on the web: models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(13), 2078–2091 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J.: Credibility and trust of information in online environments: the use of cognitive heuristics. J. Pragmat. Part B 59, 210–220 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moens, M.-F., Li, J., Chua, T.-S. (eds.): Mining User Generated Content. Social Media and Social Computing. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., Glance, N.S.: What yelp fake review filter might be doing? In: Proceedings of ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Safko, L.: The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Self, C.S.: Credibility. In: Salwen, M.B., Stacks, D.W. (eds.) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 435–456. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, Abingdon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sugeno, M.: Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Doctorial thesis (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals - a survey. In: Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, pp. 251–257. Elsevier (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Sundar, S.S.: The main model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 73–100 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria decision making methods. In: Triantaphyllou, E. (ed.) Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, pp. 5–21. Springer, New York (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Quantifier guided aggregation for the veracity assessment of online reviews. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(5), 481–501 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information - a survey. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 7(5), 1–25 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: A multi-criteria decision making approach for the assessment of information credibility in social media. In: Petrosino, A., Loia, V., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) WILF 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10147, pp. 197–207. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52962-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Wathen, C.N., Burkell, J.: Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53(2), 134–144 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 11(1), 49–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Viviani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pasi, G., Viviani, M. (2018). Application of Aggregation Operators to Assess the Credibility of User-Generated Content in Social Media. In: Medina, J., et al. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91472-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91473-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics