Skip to main content

Comparison of Fuzzy Integral-Fuzzy Measure Based Ensemble Algorithms with the State-of-the-Art Ensemble Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 853))

Abstract

The Fuzzy Integral (FI) is a non-linear aggregation operator which enables the fusion of information from multiple sources in respect to a Fuzzy Measure (FM) which captures the worth of both the individual sources and all their possible combinations. Based on the expected potential of non-linear aggregation offered by the FI, its application to decision-level fusion in ensemble classifiers, i.e. to fuse multiple classifiers outputs towards one superior decision level output, has recently been explored. A key example of such a FI-FM ensemble classification method is the Decision-level Fuzzy Integral Multiple Kernel Learning (DeFIMKL) algorithm, which aggregates the outputs of kernel based classifiers through the use of the Choquet FI with respect to a FM learned through a regularised quadratic programming approach. While the approach has been validated against a number of classifiers based on multiple kernel learning, it has thus far not been compared to the state-of-the-art in ensemble classification. Thus, this paper puts forward a detailed comparison of FI-FM based ensemble methods, specifically the DeFIMKL algorithm, with state-of-the art ensemble methods including Adaboost, Bagging, Random Forest and Majority Voting over 20 public datasets from the UCI machine learning repository. The results on the selected datasets suggest that the FI based ensemble classifier performs both well and efficiently, indicating that it is a viable alternative when selecting ensemble classifiers and indicating that the non-linear fusion of decision level outputs offered by the FI provides expected potential and warrants further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krawczyk, B., Minku, L.L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., Woźniak, M.: Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: a survey. Inf. Fusion 37, 132–156 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Domingos, P.: A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55(10), 78 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Islam, M.A., Anderson, D.T., Pinar, A.J., Havens, T.C.: Data-driven compression and efficient learning of the Choquet integral. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2755002

  4. Pinar, A.J., Rice, J., Hu, L., Anderson, D.T., Havens, T.C.: Efficient multiple kernel classification using feature and decision level fusion. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(6), 1403–1416 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, D.T., Price, S.R., Havens, T.C.: Regularization-based learning of the Choquet integral. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 2519–2526. IEEE, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pinar, A.J., Havens, T.C., Islam, M.A., Anderson, D.T.: Visualization and learning of the Choquet integral with limited training data. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 1–6, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pinar, A.J., Anderson, D.T., Havens, T.C., Zare, A., Adeyeba, T.: Measures of the Shapley index for learning lower complexity fuzzy integrals. Granular Comput. 2(4), 303–319 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinar, A., Havens, T.C., Anderson, D.T., Hu, L.: Feature and decision level fusion using multiple kernel learning and fuzzy integrals. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 1–7, August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, L., Anderson, D.T., Havens, T.C.: Multiple kernel aggregation using fuzzy integrals. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, K., Chen, C., Liu, W., Fang, X., Lu, Q.: Software defect prediction using fuzzy integral fusion based on GA-FM. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 19(5), 405–408 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, L., Zhou, D.Q., Zhou, P., Chen, Q.T.: Modelling policy decision of sustainable energy strategies for Nanjing city: a fuzzy integral approach. Renew. Energy 62, 197–203 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavrini, F., Bianchi, L., Quitadamo, L.R., Saggio, G.: A fuzzy integral ensemble method in visual P300 brain-computer interface. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2016, 1–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karczmarek, P., Pedrycz, W., Reformat, M., Akhoundi, E.: A study in facial regions saliency: a fuzzy measure approach. Soft. Comput. 18, 379–391 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Z., Xiao, N.: Fuzzy integral-based neural network ensemble for facial expression recognition. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Applications (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, D.T., Havens, T.C., Wagner, C., Keller, J.M., Anderson, M.F., Wescott, D.J.: Extension of the fuzzy integral for general fuzzy set-valued information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(6), 1625–1639 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinar, A.J., Rice, J., Havens, T.C., Masarik, M., Burns, J., Anderson, D.T.: Explosive hazard detection with feature and decision level fusion, multiple kernel learning, and fuzzy integrals. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2016, pp. 1–8, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner, C., Havens, T.C., Anderson, D.T.: The arithmetic recursive average as an instance of the recursive weighted power mean. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fakhar, K., El Aroussi, M., Saidi, M.N., Aboutajdine, D.: Applying the upper integral to the biometric score fusion problem in the identification model. In: International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies (ICEIT) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Q., Zheng, C., Yu, H., Deng, D.: Integration of heterogeneous classifiers based on choquet fuzzy integral. In: 7th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, IHMSC 2015, vol. 1, pp. 543–547 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M.: A learning model using fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral. In: Proceedings of the 5th Fuzzy System Symposium, vol. 29, pp. 213–218 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(3), 445–456 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko, Y.C., Fujita, H., Tzeng, G.H.: An extended fuzzy measure on competitiveness correlation based on WCY 2011. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 86–93 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson, D.T., Keller, J.M., Havens, T.C.: Learning fuzzy-valued fuzzy measures for the fuzzy-valued Sugeno fuzzy integral. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6178, pp. 502–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14049-5_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55, 119–139 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C: Appl. Rev. 42(4), 463–484 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun, Q., Pfahringer, B.: Bagging ensemble selection. In: Wang, D., Reynolds, M. (eds.) AI 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7106, pp. 251–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25832-9_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez-Galiano, V.F., Ghimire, B., Rogan, J., Chica-Olmo, M., Rigol-Sanchez, J.P.: An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 67(1), 93–104 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lichman, M.: UCI Machine Learning Repository. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., Amorim, D., Amorim Fernández-Delgado, D.: Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3133–3181 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Patro, S.G.K., Sahu, K.K.: Normalization: a preprocessing stage. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06462 (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by The University of Nottingham Vice-Chancellor’s Scholarship for Research Excellence (International).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Utkarsh Agrawal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agrawal, U., Pinar, A.J., Wagner, C., Havens, T.C., Soria, D., Garibaldi, J.M. (2018). Comparison of Fuzzy Integral-Fuzzy Measure Based Ensemble Algorithms with the State-of-the-Art Ensemble Algorithms. In: Medina, J., et al. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91472-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91473-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics