Skip to main content

The Impact of Multiple Real-Time Scaffolding Experiences on Science Inquiry Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10858))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Computer-assisted assessment environments, such as intelligent tutoring systems, simulations, and virtual environments are now being designed to measure students’ science inquiry practices. Some assessment environments not only evaluate students’ inquiry practice competencies, but also provide real-time scaffolding in order to help students learn. The present study aims to examine the impact of real-time scaffolding from an animated, pedagogical agent on students’ inquiry performance across a number of practices. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: receiving scaffolding or no scaffolding. All participants completed three virtual labs: Flower (a general pretest), Phase Change, and Density. Results showed that students who received immediate feedback during assessment performed better on subsequent inquiry tasks. These findings have implications for designers and researchers regarding the benefits of including real-time scaffolding within intelligent assessment systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Next Generation Science Standards Lead States: Next Generation Science Standards: for States, by States. National Academies Press, Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Research Council: A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press, Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gobert, J.D., Sao Pedro, M., Raziuddin, J., Baker, R.S.: From log files to assessment metrics: measuring students’ science inquiry skills using educational data mining. J. Learn. Sci. 22, 521–563 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deters, K.M.: Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs. J. Chem. Educ. 82(8), 1178–1180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, H., Gobert, J., Dicker, R.: Dusting off the messy middle: assessing students’ inquiry skills through doing and writing. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 175–187. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobert, J.: US News & World Report, 13 May 2016. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-13/op-ed-educational-data-mining-can-enhance-science-education

  7. Quellmalz, E.S., Timms, M.J., Silberglitt, M.D., Buckley, B.C.: Science assessments for all: integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 49(3), 363–393 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A.W., Savelsbergh, E.R., Manlove, S.: Co-lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(4), 671–688 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zapata-Rivera, D., Jackson, T., Liu, L., Bertling, M., Vezzu, M., Katz, Irvin R.: Assessing science inquiry skills using trialogues. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 625–626. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., Chinn, C.A.: Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ. Psychol. 42(2), 99–107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Quintana, C., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R.G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., Soloway, E.: A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J. Learn. Sci. 13(3), 337–386 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gobert, J., Moussavi, R., Li, H., Sao Pedro, M., Dickler, R.: Scaffolding students’ on-line data interpretation during inquiry with Inq-ITS. In: Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineering and Science Education. Springer (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sao Pedro, M., Baker, R., Gobert, J.: Incorporating scaffolding and tutor context into Bayesian knowledge tracing to predict inquiry skill acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 185–192. EDM Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sao Pedro, M.: Real-time Assessment, Prediction, and Scaffolding of Middle School Students’ Data Collection Skills Within Physical Science Simulations. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moussavi, R., Gobert, J., Sao Pedro, M.: The effect of scaffolding on the immediate transfer of students’ data interpretation skills within science topics. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 1002–1005. Scopus, Ipswich (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moussavi, R.: Design, Development, and Evaluation of Scaffolds for Data Interpretation Practices During Inquiry. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, H., Gobert, J., Dickler, R.: Automated assessment for scientific explanations in on-line science inquiry. In: Hu, X., Barnes, T., Hershkovitz, A., Paquette, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 214–219. EDM Society, Wuhan (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gobert, J.D., Sao Pedro, M.A.: Digital assessment environments for scientific inquiry practices. In: Rupp, A.A., Leighton, J.P (eds.) The Wiley Handbook of Cognition and Assessment: Frameworks, Methodologies, and Applications, West Sussex, UK, pp. 508–534 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (R305A120778) and National Science Foundation (1252477, 1629045) to Janice Gobert, Principal Investigator at Rutgers University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiying Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Gobert, J., Dickler, R., Moussavi, R. (2018). The Impact of Multiple Real-Time Scaffolding Experiences on Science Inquiry Practices. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91463-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91464-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics