Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusions: Alternative Bio-Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neoliberal Bio-Economies?

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

In the conclusion, I reflect on the implications of the previous chapters by returning to the theoretical concerns I raise throughout the book about the identification of a specifically ‘neoliberal’ bio-economy. Part of this critical engagement with neoliberalism involves identifying alternative bio-economies, reflecting different bio-economies that are not underpinned by market principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index.cfm?pg=etp.

References

  • Bakker, K. (2010) The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: Debating green neoliberalism, Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C. (2009) Publics and markets: What’s wrong with neoliberalism?, in S. Smith, R. Pain, S. Marston and J. Jones (eds) The Sage handbook of social geographies, London: SAGE, pp. 269–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, S., Moss, T. and Naumann, M. (2016) The importance of space: Towards a socio-material and political geography of energy transitions, in L. Gailing and T. Moss (eds) Conceptualizing Germany’s energy transition, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, M. and Clark, D. (2013) The burning question, London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K. (2016) Market vs. contract? The implications of contractual theories of corporate governance to the analysis of neoliberalism, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 16(1): 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K. (2017) A research agenda for neoliberalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K. and Calvert, K. (2015) Rethinking ‘drop-in’ biofuels: On the political materialities of bioenergy, Science and Technology Studies 28: 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K. and Mykhnenko, V. (eds) (2010) The rise and fall of neoliberalism, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K., Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. (2010) Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European knowledge-based bio-economy, Sustainability 2(9): 2898–2918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birner, R. (2018) Bioeconomy concepts, in I. Lewandowski (eds) Bioeconomy, Cham: Springer, pp. 17–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C. and Fressoz, J-B. (2017) The shock of the anthropocene, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2008) Environmental economic geography: A sympathetic critique, Geoforum 39: 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2009) Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy, Geography Compass 3(3), 1217–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015) Undoing the demos, Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, D., Cooper, M., Konings, M. and Primrose, D. (eds) (2018) The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism, London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, K., Kedron, P., Baka, J. and Birch, K. (2017) Geographical perspectives on sociotechnical transitions and emerging bio-economies: Introduction to a special issue, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29(5): 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2006) From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: Consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions, Environment and Planning A 38: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2008a) Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation, Environment and Planning A 40: 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2008b) Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations, Environment and Planning A 40: 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe [COM(2012) 60 Final], Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, L., Benneworth, P. and Truffer, B. (2012) Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions, Research Policy 41(6): 968–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, L., Moodysson, J. and Martin, H. (2015) Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy, Regional Studies 49(5): 850–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2014) The new way of the world, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frow, E., Ingram, D., Powell, W., Steer, D., Vogel, J. and Yearley, S. (2009) The politics of plants, Food Security 1(1): 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and case study, Research Policy 31: 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2005) The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930), Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(4): 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. and Tyfield, D. (2017) Green Keynesianism: Bringing the entrepreneurial state back in (to question)? Science as Culture, https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1346598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. and Coenen, L. (2015) The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, R. (2008) Environmental economic geography, Geography Compass 2: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidkamp, P. (2008) A theoretical framework for a ‘spatially conscious’ economic analysis of environmental issues, Geoforum 39: 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009) Prosperity without growth, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedron, P. (2015) Environmental governance and shifts in Canadian biofuel production and innovation, The Professional Geography 67(3): 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, L. and Marsden, T. (2011) Constructing sustainable communities: A theoretical exploration of the bio-economy and eco-economy paradigms, Local Environment 16: 753–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2013) Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation: The knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda, Science, Technology, and Human Values 38: 94–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2012) EU agri-innovation policy: Two contending visions of the knowledge-based bio-economy, Critical Policy Studies 6: 40–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (2009) Material markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (2012) Third natures? Reconstituting space through place-making strategies for sustainability, International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19(2): 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (2017) Agri-food and rural development: Sustainable place-making, London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013) The entrepreneurial state, London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, K. and Kautto, N. (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview, Sustainability 5: 2589–2608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonagh, J. (2015) Rural geography III: Do we really have a choice? The bioeconomy and future rural pathways, Progress in Human Geography 39(5): 658–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben B. (2012) Global warming’s terrifying new math, Rolling Stone 19 July, retrieved from: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719.

  • McKibben, B. (2016) Recalculating the climate math, New Republic 22 September, retrieved from: https://newrepublic.com/article/136987/recalculating-climate-math.

  • Mirowski, P. (2013) Never let a serious crisis go to waste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (2011) Carbon democracy, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W. (2015) Capitalism in the web of life, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimark, B. (2016) Biofuel imaginaries: The emerging politics surrounding ‘inclusive’ private sector development in Madagascar, Journal of Rural Studies 45: 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niggli, U., Slabe, A., Schmid, O., Halberg, N. and Schluter, M. (2008) Vision for an organic food and farming research agenda to 2025, Brussels: IFOAM-EU and FiBL.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchell, J. and Hayter, R. (2013) Environmental and evolutionary economic geography: Time for EEG2? Geografiska Annaler B 95(2): 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C. (2015) Against neoliberal pedagogies of plants and people: Mapping actor networks of biocapital in learning gardens, Environmental Education Research 21(3): 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. and Swedberg, R. (eds) (2008) Living in a material world, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957) The economy as instituted process, in K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg and H. Pearson (eds) Trade and market in the early empires, Illinois: Free Press and Falcon’s Wing Press, pp. 239–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. (2014) The evolutionary dynamics of biofuel value chains: From unipolar and government-driven to multipolar governance, Environment and Planning A 46(2): 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. and Birch, K. (2014) Introduction: The imaginaries and governance of ‘biofueled futures’, Environment and Planning A 46(2): 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. (2016) Our new arms, in S. Springer, K. Birch and J. MacLeavy (eds) The handbook of neoliberalism, London: Routledge, pp. 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohracher, H. (2010) Biofuels and their publics: The need for differentiated analyses and strategies, Biofuels 1(1): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romm, J. (2018) Solar and wind power alone could provide four fifths of US power, reneweconomy.com.au , retrieved from: http://reneweconomy.com.au/solar-and-wind-power-alone-could-provide-four-fifths-of-us-power-75235/.

  • Scarlat, N. and Dallemand, J-F. (2011) Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview, Energy Policy 39: 1630–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, O. et al. (2009) Technology platform organics: Strategic research agenda, Brussels: Technology Platform Organics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, O., Padel, S. and Levidow, L. (2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective, Bio-based and Applied Economics 1: 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. and Walker, G. (2007) CAUTION! Transition ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management, Environment and Planning A 39(4): 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M. and McCormick, K. (2013) Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches, Sustainability 5: 2751–2769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (2016) The neo-liberal city as idea and reality, Territory, Politics, Governance 4(2): 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TP Organics. (2015) TP Organics work programme 2015–2017, Brussels: IFOAM-EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyfield, D. (2014) ‘King coal is dead! Long live the king!’: The paradoxes of coal’s resurgence in the emergence of global low-carbon societies, Theory, Culture & Society 31(5): 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyfield, D. (2017) Liberalism 2.0 and the rise of China, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2012) National bioeconomy blueprint, Washington, DC: The White House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H., Krabbenborg, L. and Zwier, J. (2015) Is dandelion rubber more natural? Naturalness, biotechnology and the transition towards a bio-based society, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28: 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Kean Birch

Authors
  1. Kean Birch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Birch, K. (2019). Conclusions: Alternative Bio-Economies. In: Neoliberal Bio-Economies?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91424-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91424-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91423-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91424-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation