Skip to main content

Using Analogical Complexes to Improve Human Reasoning and Decision Making in Electronic Health Record Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning (ICCS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10872))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A key ability of human reasoning is analogical reasoning. In this context, an important notion is that of analogical proportions that have been formalized and analyzed in the last decade. A bridging to Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) has been brought by introducing analogical complexes, i.e. formal concepts that share a maximal analogical relation enabling by this analogies between (formal) concepts. Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are nowadays widespread and used in different scenarios. In this paper we consider the problem of improving EHR systems by using analogical complexes in an FCA based setting. Moreover, we present a study case of analogical complexes in a medical field. We analyze analogical proportions in Electronic Health Record Systems and prove that EHRs can be improved with an FCA grounded analogical reasoning component. This component offers methods for knowledge discovery and knowledge acquisition for medical experts based on patterns revealed by analogies. We also show that combining analogical reasoning with FCA brings a new perspective on the analyzed data that can improve the understanding of the subsequent knowledge structures and offering a valuable support for decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Correa, W.F., Prade, H., Richard, G.: Trying to understand how analogical classifiers work. In: Hüllermeier, E., Link, S., Fober, T., Seeger, B. (eds.) SUM 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7520, pp. 582–589. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Delen, D., Walker, G., Kadam, A.: Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 34(2), 113–127 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis - Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59830-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Haliţă, D., Săcărea, C.: Is FCA suitable to improve electronic health record systems? In: SoftCom 2016, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Meili, R., Scoville, R., Taylor, R.: Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff. 24(5), 1103–1117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jay, N., Kohler, F., Napoli, A.: Using formal concept analysis for mining and interpreting patient flows within a healthcare network. In: Yahia, S.B., Nguifo, E.M., Belohlavek, R. (eds.) CLA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4923, pp. 263–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78921-5_19

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, J., Fu, A., He, H., Chen, J., Jin, H., McAullay, D., Williams, G., Sparks, R., Kelman, C.: Mining risk patterns in medical data. In: SIGKDD 2005, pp. 770–775. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Menachemi, N., Collum, T.: Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 5, 47–55 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miclet, L., Barbot, N., Prade, H.: From analogical proportions in lattices to proportional analogies in formal concepts. In: Schaub, T., Friedrich, G., O’Sullivan, B. (eds.) ECAI 2014–21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18–22 August 2014, Prague, Czech Republic - Including Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS 2014), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 263, pp. 627–632. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miclet, L., Nicolas, J.: From formal concepts to analogical complexes. In: Proceedings of Twelfth International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 13–16 October 2015, pp. 159–170 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miclet, L., Prade, H., Guennec, D.: Looking for analogical proportions in a formal concept analysis setting. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Nancy, France, 17–20 October 2011, pp. 295–307 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Săcărea, C.: Investigating oncological databases using conceptual landscapes. In: Hernandez, N., Jäschke, R., Croitoru, M. (eds.) ICCS 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8577, pp. 299–304. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08389-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Săcărea, C., Sotropa, D., Troanca, D.: Symptoms investigation by means of formal concept analysis for enhancing medical diagnoses. In: Begusic, D., Rozic, N., Radic, J., Saric, M. (eds.) 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, SoftCOM 2017, Split, Croatia, 21–23 September 2017, pp. 1–5 IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Slight, S.P.: Meaningful use of electronic health records: experiences from the field and future opportunities. JMIR Med. Inform. 3(3), 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soni, J., Ansari, U., Sharma, D., Soni, S.: Predictive data mining for medical diagnosis: an overview of heart disease prediction. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 17(8), 43–48 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sowa, J., Majumdar, A.: Analogical reasoning. In: Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication, 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2003 Dresden, Germany, 21–25 July 2003 Proceedings, pp. 16–36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang, P.C., McDonald, C.J.: Electronic Health Record Systems. In: Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J. (eds.) Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. HI. Springer, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36278-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wille, R.: Conceptual contents as information - basics for contextual judgment logic. In: Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication, Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2003 Dresden, Germany, 21–25 July 2005, pp. 1–15 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wille, R.: Methods of conceptual knowledge processing. In: Missaoui, R., Schmidt, J. (eds.) ICFCA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3874, pp. 1–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11671404_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Şotropa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Săcărea, C., Şotropa, D., Troancă, D. (2018). Using Analogical Complexes to Improve Human Reasoning and Decision Making in Electronic Health Record Systems. In: Chapman, P., Endres, D., Pernelle, N. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10872. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91379-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91379-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91379-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics